Article published in:
The Wealth and Breadth of Construction-Based Research
Edited by Timothy Colleman, Frank Brisard, Astrid De Wit, Renata Enghels, Nikos Koutsoukos, Tanja Mortelmans and María Sol Sansiñena
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34] 2020
► pp. 135147
References

References

Barðdal, Jóhanna, and Spike Gildea
2015 “Diachronic Construction Grammar: Epistemological Context, Basic Assumptions and Historical Implications.” In Diachronic Construction Grammar, ed. by Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer, and Spike Gildea (eds.), 1–49. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beckner, Clay, Richard Blythe, Joan Bybee, Morton H. Christiansen, William Croft, Nick C. Ellis, John Holland, Jinyun Ke, Diane Larsen-Freeman, and Tom Schoenemann
2009 “Language is a Complex Adaptive System: Position Paper.” Language Learning 59: 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Behrens, Heike
2011 “Grammatik und Lexikon im Spracherwerb: Konstruktionsprozesse.” In Sprachliches Wissen zwischen Lexikon und Grammatik, ed. by Stefan Engelberg, Anke Holler, and Kristel Proost, 375–396. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Hans C.
2003A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2005 “Determining the Productivity of Resultative Constructions: A Reply to Goldberg & Jackendoff.” Language 81(2): 448–464. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Zum Abstraktionsgrad von Resultativkonstruktionen.” In Sprachliches Wissen zwischen Lexikon und Grammatik, ed. by Stefan Engelberg, Kristel Proost, and Anke Holler, 37–69. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 145 ]
Boas, Hans C., and Alexander Ziem
2018 “Constructing a Constructicon for German: Empirical, Theoretical and Methodological Issues.” In Constructicography: Constructicon Development across Languages, ed. by Benjamin Lyngfelt, Lars Borin, Kyoko Ohara, and Tiago Timponi Torrent, 183–228. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bußmann, Hadumod
2008Lexikon der Sprachwissenschaft. 4th edn. Stuttgart: Kröner.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2010Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2012Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark
2008–The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Available online at https://​www​.english​-corpora​.org​/coca/
Dirven, René, and Günter Radden
2007Cognitive English Grammar. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dürscheid, Christa
2013 “Casus obliquus.” Wörterbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft (WSK) Online (2013). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. https://​db​.degruyter​.com​/view​/WSK​/wsk​_id​_wsk​_artikel​_artikel​_8550 (Last accessed 29 August, 2020).
Faulhaber, Susen
2011Verb Valency Patterns: A Challenge for Semantics-Based Accounts. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1968 “The Case for Case.” In Universals in Linguistic Theory, ed. by Emmon Bach, and Robert T. Harms, 0–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
2007 “Valency Issues in FrameNet.” In Valency: Theoretical, Descriptive and Cognitive Issues, ed. by Thomas Herbst, and Katrin Götz-Votteler, 129–160. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2014 “Frames, Constructions and FrameNet.” In Constructions – Collocations – Patterns, ed. by Thomas Herbst, Hans-Jörg Schmid, and Susen Faulhaber, 121–166. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2019Explain Me This: Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E., and Ray Jackendoff
2004 “The English Resultative as a Family of Constructions.” Language 80(3): 532–568. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, Tor Arne
2012Polyvalent Adjectives in Norwegian: Aspects of their Semantics and Complementation Patterns. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Helbig, Gerhard, and Wolfgang Schenkel
1973Wörterbuch zur Valenz und Distribution deutscher Verben. Leipzig: Verlag Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar
Herbst, Thomas
2011 “The Status of Generalizations: Valency and Argument Structure Constructions.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 59(4): 347–367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “The Valency Approach to Argument Structure Constructions.” In Constructions – Collocations – Patterns, ed. by Thomas Herbst, Hans-Jörg Schmid, and Susen Faulhaber, 167–216. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 146 ]
2016 “Foreign Language Learning is Construction Learning – what else? Moving towards Pedagogical Construction Grammar.” In Applied Construction Grammar, ed. by Sabine de Knop, and Gaëtanelle Gilquin, 21–51. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020 “Constructions, Generalizations, and the Unpredictability of Language: Moving towards Colloconstruction Grammar.” Constructions and Frames 12(1): 56–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herbst, Thomas, David Heath, Ian F. Roe, and Dieter Götz
2004A Valency Dictionary of English. London/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herbst, Thomas, and Thomas Hoffmann
2018 “Construction Grammar for Students: A Constructionist Approach to Syntactic Analysis (CASA).” Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 6: 197–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herbst, Thomas, and Susen Schüller
2008Introduction to Syntactic Analysis: A Valency Approach. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2020 “Constructional Approaches.” In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar, ed. by Bas Aarts, Jill Bowie, and Gergana Popova, 106–123. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas
2015 “Cognitive Sociolinguistic Aspects of Football Chants: the Role of Social and Physical Context in Usage-Based Construction Grammar.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66(3): 273–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoffrey K. Pullum
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
2008Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1916Cours de linguistique générale (Ed. by Charles Bally & Albert Séchehaye). Lausanne: Payot.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2000English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020The Dynamics of the Linguistic System: Usage, Conventionalization and Entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, Helmut, Jacqueline Kubczak, Renate Schmidt, and Vera de Ruiter
2004 valbu – Valenzwörterbuch deutscher Verben. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Uhrig, Peter
2018Subjects in English: From Valency Grammar to a Constructionist Treatment of Non-Canonical Subjects. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 147 ]