Article published in:
The Wealth and Breadth of Construction-Based Research
Edited by Timothy Colleman, Frank Brisard, Astrid De Wit, Renata Enghels, Nikos Koutsoukos, Tanja Mortelmans and María Sol Sansiñena
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34] 2020
► pp. 174185
References

[ p. 184 ]References

Akita, Kimi
2009A Grammar of Sound-Symbolic Words in Japanese: Theoretical Approaches to Iconic and Lexical Properties of Mimetics. PhD dissertation, Kobe University.Google Scholar
2017 “Grammatical and Functional Properties of Mimetics in Japanese.” In The Grammar of Japanese Mimetics: Perspectives from Structure, Acquisition, and Translation, ed. by Noriko Iwasaki, Peter Sells, and Kimi Akita, 20–34. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cienki, Alan
2008 “Why Study Metaphor and Gesture?” In Metaphor and Gesture, ed. by Alan Cienki and Cornelia Müller, 5–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand
1916Cours de linguistique générale [Course in General Linguistics]. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark, and Kimi Akita
2017 “An Inverse Relation between Expressiveness and Grammatical Integration: On the Morphosyntactic Typology of Ideophones, with Special Reference to Japanese.” Journal of Linguistics 53(3): 501–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles, Paul Kay, and Mary Catherine O’Connor
1988 “Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone .” Language 64(3): 501–538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, John
2018Ideophones and the Evolution of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kanetani, Masaru
2019 “Toward a Multimodal CxG Analysis of Japanese Mimetic Expressions.” Paper presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea , held on August 21–24 at Leipzig University.
Kendon, Adam
2004Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kita, Sotaro
1997 “Two-Dimensional Semantic Analysis of Japanese Mimetics.” Linguistics 35(2): 379–415. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán
2000Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1980Metaphors we Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ono, Masahiro
(ed) 2007 Giongo/gitigo 4500: Nihongo onomatope jiten [Dictionary of Japanese Onomatopoeias]. Tokyo: Shogakkan.Google Scholar
Riidaazu Eiwa Jiten Henshuubu (ed)
2007 Manga de tanoshimu Eigo giongo jiten [A Treasure-House of English Onomatopoeias]. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. E.
1990From Etymology to Pragmatics Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 185 ]
Voeltz, F. K. Erhard, and Christa Kilian-Hatz
(eds) 2001Ideophones. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ziem, Alexander
2017 “Do we Really Need Multimodal Construction Grammar?Linguistics Vanguard 3(S1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zima, Elisabeth, and Alexander Bergs
2017 “Multimodality and Construction Grammar.” Linguistics Vanguard 3(S1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar