Cover not available
Article published In:
The Wealth and Breadth of Construction-Based Research
Edited by Timothy Colleman, Frank Brisard, Astrid De Wit, Renata Enghels, Nikos Koutsoukos, Tanja Mortelmans and María Sol Sansiñena
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34] 2020
► pp. 295–305

Strong resultative constructions in Romance between usage and norm

Evidence from Northern Calabria

| University of Pisa
The presence of strong resultative constructions in Romance languages is largely debated. In this paper, we provide evidence of strong resultative constructions with adjectival predicate in Italo-Romance. Data from Southern Italian varieties spoken in the area of Cosenza, in Northern Calabria, are discussed. The usage and distribution of two types of adjectival resultative are accounted for in relation to both structural and functional properties, and sociolinguistic variables.
Keywords: Southern Italian varieties, resultative constructions, adjectival predicates, object animacy, sociolinguistic variables
Article outline
  • 1.The construction portare finito in Northern Calabria
  • 2. Portare finito and the resultative constructions in Italo-Romance
    • 2.1Adjectival resultatives in Romance
    • 2.2The curious case of a strong resultative construction in Cosentian
  • 3.Usage and distribution of portare finito: An investigation into the varieties of Cosenza, Rende and Rogliano
    • 3.1Object animacy and sociolinguistic variables
    • 3.2 Portare finito between semantic changes and ‘creative’ uses
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 28 May 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.00054.rom
References (38)
References
Bates, Elisabeth, Cristina Burani, Simona D’Amico, and Laura Barca. 2001. “Word Reading and Picture Naming in Italian.” Memory & Cognition 29 (7): 986–999. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beavers, John. 2010. “The Structure of Lexical Meaning: Why Semantics Really Matters.” Language 86 (4): 821–864. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beavers, John, Beth Levin, and Shiao Wei Tham. 2010. “The Typology of Motion Expressions Revisited.” Journal of Linguistics 46 (2): 331–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benincà, Paola, and Cecilia Poletto. 2005. “Phrasal Verbs in Venetan and Regional Italian.” In Language Variation – European Perspectives. Selected papers from the Third International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 3), ed. by Frans L. Hinskens, 9–22. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier M. 1986. Tempo, aspetto e azione nel verbo italiano [Tense, aspect and actionality in the Italian verb]. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier M., and Denis Delfitto. 2000. “Aspect vs. Actionality: Some Reasons for Keeping Them Apart.” In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, ed. by Östen Dahl, 189–225. Berlin: Mouton – De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Boas, Hans. 2003. A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications.Google Scholar
Broccias, Cristiano. 2003. The English Change Network. Forcing Changes into Schemas. Berlin: Mouton – De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “The Cognitive Basis of Adjectival and Adverbial Resultative Constructions.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 2 (1): 103–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William, Barðdal Jóhanna, Willem Hollmann, Violeta Sotirova, and Chiaki Taoka. 2010. “Revising Talmy’s Typological Classification of Complex Event Constructions.” In Contrastive Studies in Construction Grammar, ed. by Hans Boas: 201–236. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David R. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folli, Raffaella. 2001. “Two Strategies to Construct Telicity: a Comparative Analysis of English and Italian.” Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics 61: 47–66.Google Scholar
Folli, Raffaella, and Gillian Rachmand. 2005. “Prepositions and Results in Italian and English: an Analysis from Event Decomposition.” In Perspectives on Aspect, ed. by Henk Verkuyl, Angeliek van Hout, and Henriëtte de Swart, 81–105. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folli, Raffaella, and Heidi Harley. 2004. “Consuming Results in Italian & English: Flavours of V.” In Aspectual Inquiries, ed. by Roumyana Slabakova, and Paula Kempchinsky, 95–120. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Iacobini, Claudio. 2012. “Grammaticalization and Innovation in the Encoding of Motion Events.” Folia Linguistica 46 (2): 359–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iacobini, Claudio, and Francesca Masini. 2009. “I verbi sintagmatici dell’italiano tra innovazione e persistenza: il ruolo dei dialetti Phrasal verbs in Italian between innovation and persistence: The role of dialects].” In Italiano, italiani regionali e dialetti, ed. by Paola Benincà, Paolo Chinellato, Patrizia Cordin, Verner Egerland, Claudio Iacobini, Francesca Masini, Nicoletta Penello, Cecilia Poletto, and Anna Vera Sullam, 115–135. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1998. “The Origins of Telicity.” In Events and Grammar, ed. by Susan Rothstein, 197–235. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth, and Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity. at the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge/London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mateu, Jaume. 2000. “Why Can’t We Wipe the Slate Clean? A Lexical-Syntactic Approach to Resultative Constructions.” Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 81: 71–95.Google Scholar
Métairy, Justine, Peter Lauwers, Renata Enghels, Miriam Taverniers, and Marleen Van Peteghem. 2020. “A Micro-Typological Perspective on Resultative Secondary Predicates: the Case of Nomination Verb Constructions.” Language Sciences, 781: 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morita, Chigusa. 2009. “A Crosslinguistic Observation of Resultative Constructions.” Linguistic Research 251: 43–55.Google Scholar
Napoli, Donna J. 1992. “Secondary Resultative Predicates in Italian.” Journal of Linguistics 28 (1): 53–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riccio, Anna. 2018. “The Syntax-Semantic Interface in Italian Result-Oriented Argument Structures.” In Applying and Expanding Role and Reference Grammar, ed. by Rolf Kailuweit, Lisann Künkel, and Eva Staudinger, 175–188. Freiburg: FRIAS.Google Scholar
Romagno, Domenica. 2015. “Telicità inerente e telicità configurazionale: l’uso del clitico dativo in alcune varietà dialettali della Calabria settentrionale [Inherent and compositional telicity: The use of the dative clitic pronoun in some dialectal varieties of Northern Calabria].” L’Italia Dialettale 761: 163–179.Google Scholar
. 2020. “Ancora sull’uso del clitico dativo in alcune varietà dialettali della provincia di Cosenza. Fra semantica di interfaccia e gerarchia di possesso [Further investigations into the use of the dative clitic pronoun in some dialectal varieties of the area of Cosenza: Between interface semantics and possession].” Lingua e Stile 551: 125–152.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Susan. 1979. “The Syntactic Forms of Predication.” PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Simone, Raffaele. 2008. “Coefficienti verbali nei nomi [Verbal coefficients in nouns].” In Categorie del verbo diacronia, teoria, tipologia. Atti del XXXI Convegno della Società Italiana di Glottologia (Pisa, 26–28 ottobre 2006), ed. by Pier M. Bertinetto, Valentina Bambini, Cristina Bertoncin, and Margherita Farina, 83–113. Roma: il Calamo.Google Scholar
Simpson, Jane. 1983. “Resultatives.” In Papers in Lexical-Functional Grammar, ed. by Beth Levin, Malka Rappaport Hovav, and Annie Zaenen, 143–157. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1975. “Semantics and Syntax of Motion.” In Syntax and Semantics 4, ed. by John P. Kimball, 181–238. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1985. “Lexicalization Patterns: Semantic Structure in Lexical Forms.” In Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Volume 3, ed. by Timothy Shopen, 57–149. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1991. “Path to Realization – via Aspect and Result.” In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. by Laurel Sutton, Christopher Johnson, and Ruth Shields, 480–519. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Tenny, Carol L. 1994. Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Graeme Trousdale. 2010. “Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization: How Do They Intersect?” In Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization, ed. by Elizabeth Closs Traugott, and Graeme Trousdale, 19–44. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. 2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., and Randy J. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning & Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Washio, Ryuichi. 1997. “Resultatives, Compositionality, and Language Variation.” Journal of East Asian Linguistics 61: 1–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Métairy, Justine
2022. Verb Classes in the Resultative Construction in Germanic and Romance Languages. Transactions of the Philological Society 120:2 ► pp. 246 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.