Article published in:
The Wealth and Breadth of Construction-Based Research
Edited by Timothy Colleman, Frank Brisard, Astrid De Wit, Renata Enghels, Nikos Koutsoukos, Tanja Mortelmans and María Sol Sansiñena
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34] 2020
► pp. 306319
References

References

Barðdal, Jóhanna, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer, and Spike Gildea
eds. 2015Diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bieler, Ludwig
(ed.) 1957Anicii manlii severini boethii philosophiae consolatio. Turnholti: Brepols.Google Scholar
Boas, Hans C., and Steffen Höder
(eds) 2018Constructions in Contact: Constructional Perspectives on Contact Phenomena in Germanic Languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boethius
1897The Consolation of Philosophy of Boethius. (H. R. James, Trans.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1987 “The Remarkable Double IS.” English Today 3 (1): 39–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brenier, Jason M., and Laura A. Michaelis
2005 “Optimization via Syntactic Amalgam: Syntax-Prosody Mismatch and Copula Doubling.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1 (1): 45–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cropp, Glynnis M.
(ed.) 2006Le livre de Boece de consolacion. Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
Curzan, Anne
2012 “Revisiting the Reduplicative Copula with Corpus-Based Evidence.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ed. by Terttu Nevalainen, and Elizabeth Closs Traugott, 211–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark
2008–The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 560 Million Words, 1990-Present. Available Online at https://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/coca/
De Smet, Hendrik
2012Spreading Patterns: Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delahunty, Gerald P.
2012 “An Analysis of The Thing Is That S Sentences.” Pragmatics 22 (1): 41–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gregersen, Sune
2018 “Some (Critical) Questions for Diachronic Construction Grammar.” Folia Linguistica 52 (s39-2): 341–360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keizer, Evelien
2013 “The X Is (Is) Construction: An FDG Account.” In Casebook in Functional Discourse Grammar, ed. by Lachlan Mackenzie and Hella Olbertz, 213–248. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mantlik, Annette
2011The Historical Development of Shell Nouns: A Diachronic Study of Abstract Noun Constructions in English. PhD dissertation, LMU Munich.Google Scholar
Mantlik, Annette, and Hans-Jörg Schmid
2018 “ That-Complementiser Omission in N+BE+That-Clauses: Register Variation or Constructional Change?” In The Noun Phrase in English: Past and Present, ed. by Alex Ho-Cheong Leung, and Wim Van der Wurff, 187–222. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 319 ]
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2000English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020The Dynamics of the Linguistic System: Usage, Conventionalization, and Entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg, and Annette Mantlik
2015 “Entrenchment in Historical Corpora? Reconstructing Dead Authors’ Minds from Their Usage Profiles.” Anglia 133 (4): 583–623. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shibasaki, Reijirou
2015 “On the Grammaticalization of The Thing Is and Related Issues in the History of American English.” In Studies in the History of the English Language VI, ed. by Michael Adams, Laurel J. Brinton, and R. D. Fulk, 99–122. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Stvan, Laurel Smith
2014 “Truth Is, Sentence-Initial Shell Nouns Are Showing up Bare.” In Complex Visibles Out There. Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium 2014: Language Use and Linguistic Structure, ed. by Ludmila Veselovská, and Markéta Janebová, 591–606. Olomouc: Palacký University.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Graeme Trousdale
2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tuggy, David
1996 “The Thing Is Is That People Talk That Way. The Question Is Is Why?” In Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods: The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics, ed. by Eugene H. Casad, 713–752. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zimmer, Ben
2011 “The Elusive Triple ‘Is’.” https://​languagelog​.ldc​.upenn​.edu​/nll​/?p​=3452 (last accessed 11.08.2020)