Article published In:
The Wealth and Breadth of Construction-Based Research
Edited by Timothy Colleman, Frank Brisard, Astrid De Wit, Renata Enghels, Nikos Koutsoukos, Tanja Mortelmans and María Sol Sansiñena
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34] 2020
► pp. 345356
Bryer, Jason
2019likert: Analysis and Visualization of Likert Items. R-script available at [URL] (last checked 21/10/2020)
Dahl, Östen
2001 “Inflationary Effects in Language and Elsewhere.” In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, ed. by Joan L. Bybee, and Paul J. Hopper, 471–480. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
d’Avis, Franz, and Rita Finkbeiner
(eds) 2019Expressivität im Deutschen. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
De Wit, Astrid, Peter Petré, and Frank Brisard
2020 “Standing out with the Progressive.” Journal of Linguistics 56 (3): 479–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Detges, Ulrich, and Richard Waltereit
2002 “Grammaticalization vs. Reanalysis: a Semantic-Pragmatic Account of Functional Change in Grammar.” Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 21 (2). 151–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drummond, Alex D.
2020Ibex Farm. Available at [URL] (last checked 21/10/2020)
Eitelmann, Matthias, and Dagmar Haumann
eds. In prep. Extravagant Morphology Amsterdam/Philadelphia John Benjamins
Günther, Christine, Sven Kotowski, and Ingo Plag
2020 “Phrasal Compounds Can Have Adjectival Heads: Evidence from English.” English Language and Linguistics 24 (1): 75–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1999 “Why Is Grammaticalization Irreversible?Linguistics 37 (6): 1043–1068. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hein, Katrin
2017 “Modeling the Properties of German Phrasal Compounds within a Usage-Based Constructional Approach.” In Further Investigations into the Nature of Phrasal Compounding, ed. by Carola Trips, and Jaklin Kornfilt, 119–148. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, Osamu
2014 “The Nature of Speaker Creativity in Linguistic Innovation.” In Usage-Based Approaches to Language Change, ed. by Evie Coussé, and Ferdinand von Mengden, 147–166. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keller, Rudi
1994Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kempf, Luise, and Stefan Hartmann
2018 “Schema Unification and Morphological Productivity: A Diachronic Perspective.” In The Construction of Words. Advances in Construction Morphology, ed. by Geert E. Booij, 441–474. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
forthcoming. “What’s Extravagant about be-sandaled Feet? Morphology, Semantics and Pragmatics of German Pseudo-Participles.” In Extravagant morphology ed. by Matthias Eitelmann, and Dagmar Haumann Amsterdam/ Philadelphia John Benjamins
Lensch, Anke
2018 “ Fixer-Uppers. Reduplication in the Derivation of Phrasal Verbs.” In Exact Repetition in Grammar and Discourse, ed. by Rita Finkbeiner, and Ulrike Freywald, 158–181. Berlin/ Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “The Extravagant Progressive: An Experimental Corpus Study on the History of Emphatic [be Ving].” English Language and Linguistics 21 (2): 227–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
2020R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Manual. Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2020The Dynamics of the Linguistic System: Usage, Conventionalization, and Entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg, and Franziska Günther
2016 “Toward a Unified Socio-Cognitive Framework for Salience in Language.” Frontiers in Psychology 71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ungerer, Tobias, and Stefan Hartmann
2020 “Attack of the Snowclones: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Extravagant Formulaic Patterns.” Paper presented at the UK Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Birmingham, July 27–29.
Zima, Elisabeth, and Geert Brône
2015 “Cognitive Linguistics and Interactional Discourse: Time to Enter into Dialogue.” Language and Cognition 7 (4): 485–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M., and Geoffrey K. Pullum
1987 “Plain Morphology and Expressive Morphology.” Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 131: 330–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar