Phasality, polarity, focality: A feature analysis of the Latin particle iam

Kroon, Caroline; Risselada, Rodie

doi:10.1075/bjl.16.05kro

Article published In:

Particles
Edited by Ton van der Wouden, Ad Foolen and Piet Van de Craen
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 16] 2002
► pp. 65–78

Phasality, polarity, focality

A feature analysis of the Latin particle iam

Caroline Kroon

Rodie Risselada

Published online: 12 May 2003

https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.16.05kro

Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Order by:

Crisostomo, C. Jay

2017. The Sumerian Discourse Markers u4-ba and u4-bi-a. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 69:1 ► pp. 49 ff.

Delbecque, Nicole & Ricardo Maldonado

2011. Spanish ya. A conceptual pragmatic anchor. Journal of Pragmatics 43:1 ► pp. 73 ff.

Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard & Erling Strudsholm

2008. The semantics of particles: advantages of a contrastive and panchronic approach: a study of the polysemy of French déjà and Italian già. Linguistics 46:3

Schrickx, Josine

2016. Nedum: ‘much less’ or ‘much more’?. Journal of Latin Linguistics 15:1

Schrickx, Josine

2017. Chapter 11. Polar questions in Latin with and without the enclitic particle -ne. In Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek [Studies in Language Companion Series, 190], ► pp. 235 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.