Article published In:
Hybrid QuotationsEdited by Philippe De Brabanter
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17] 2003
► pp. 213–229
Edited by Philippe De Brabanter
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17] 2003
► pp. 213–229
Lost Hopes and Mixed Quotes
The analysis of mixed quotation proposed in Cappelen & Lepore (1997a), purportedly as a development of Davidson’s accounts of direct and of indirect quotation, is critically examined. It is argued that the analysis fails to specify either necessary or sufficient conditions on mixed quotation, and that the way it has been defended by its proponents makes its alleged Davidsonian parentage questionable.
Cited by (3)
Cited by 3 other publications
MCCULLAGH, MARK
2011. CRITICAL NOTICE OF LANGUAGE TURNED ON ITSELF, BY HERMAN CAPPELEN AND ERNIE LEPORE. Analytic Philosophy 52:4 ► pp. 349 ff. 
De Brabanter, Philippe
2010. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Hybrid Quotations. Language and Linguistics Compass 4:2 ► pp. 107 ff.
DE BRABANTER, PHILIPPE
2023. Accounting for non-constituents in hybrid quotations: Why unquotation is not the answer. Journal of Linguistics 59:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.