Article published In:
Framing: From grammar to applicationEdited by Paul Sambre and Maria-Cornelia Wermuth
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 24] 2010
► pp. 54–82
Edited by Paul Sambre and Maria-Cornelia Wermuth
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 24] 2010
► pp. 54–82
The syntax–lexicon continuum in Construction Grammar
A case study of English communication verbs
This paper offers an alternative analysis of Goldberg’s (1995) account of communication verbs appearing in the ditransitive construction. Based on a more finely-grained frame-semantic analysis of constructional phenomena, it is shown that generalizations over specific syntactic frames are possible at different levels of semantic abstraction. This, in turn, allows us to make across-the-board generalizations that hold not only between lexical units evoking the same frame, but also between lexical units belonging to different frames at different levels of abstraction. The resulting network of constructions combines Goldberg’s proposals regarding the status of abstract-schematic constructions with item-specific knowledge regarding the specific lexical units, with various midpoints in between. This approach has the advantage that there is no need for fusing lexical entries with abstract meaningful constructions, thereby avoiding some of the problems that arise due to the separation of syntax and the lexicon in some constructional approaches.
Cited by
Cited by 33 other publications
Boas, Hans C. & Ryan Dux
2017. From the past into the present: From case frames to semantic frames. Linguistics Vanguard 3:1 
Boas, Hans C. & Steffen Höder
2018. Construction Grammar and language contact. In Constructions in Contact [Constructional Approaches to Language, 24], ► pp. 5 ff.
Boas, Hans C. & Alexander Ziem
2018. Chapter 7. Constructing a constructicon for German. In Constructicography [Constructional Approaches to Language, 22], ► pp. 183 ff.
Diessel, Holger
2019. The Grammar Network,
Diessel, Holger
2023. The Constructicon,
DOĞRU, Fatih
2021. Risâletü'n-Nushiyye'de İletişim Fiilleri. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
Giomi, Riccardo
2021. The Place of Interpersonal Lexemes in Linguistic Theory, with Special Reference to Functional Discourse Grammar. Corpus Pragmatics 5:2 ► pp. 187 ff.
Goh, Hui-Ngo, Lay-Ki Soon & Su-Cheng Haw
2013. Automatic dominant character identification in fables based on verb analysis – Empirical study on the impact of anaphora resolution. Knowledge-Based Systems 54 ► pp. 147 ff.
Goh, Hui-Ngo, Lay-Ki Soon & Su-Cheng Haw
2015. Automatic discovery of person-related named-entity in news articles based on verb analysis. Multimedia Tools and Applications 74:8 ► pp. 2587 ff.
Hennecke, Inga & Evelyn Wiesinger
2023. Chapter 1. Construction Grammar meets Hispanic linguistics. In Constructions in Spanish [Constructional Approaches to Language, 34], ► pp. 2 ff.
Imo, Wolfgang
2015. Interactional Construction Grammar. Linguistics Vanguard 1:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Luzondo Oyón, Alba
2014. Constraining factors on the family of resultative constructions. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:1 ► pp. 30 ff.
Luzondo-Oyón, Alba & Rocío Jiménez-Briones
2014. FrameNet and FunGramKB: A comparison of two computational resources for semantic knowledge representation. In Language Processing and Grammars [Studies in Language Companion Series, 150], ► pp. 197 ff.
Luzondo-Oyón, Alba & Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza-Ibáñez
2015. Argument structure constructions in a Natural Language Processing environment. Language Sciences 48 ► pp. 70 ff.
Masegosa, Alicia Galera & Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez
2012. Lexical class and perspectivization constraints on subsumption in the Lexical Constructional Model: the case of say verbs in English. Language Sciences 34:1 ► pp. 54 ff.
MATUSEVYCH, YEVGEN, AFRA ALISHAHI & AD BACKUS
2017. The impact of first and second language exposure on learning second language constructions. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20:1 ► pp. 128 ff.
Ohara, Kyoko
2018. Chapter 5. Relations between frames and constructions. In Constructicography [Constructional Approaches to Language, 22], ► pp. 141 ff.
Paszenda, Joanna
2017. Chapter 8. Motivation behind the extended senses of the Polish ditransitive construction. In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58], ► pp. 241 ff.
Pedersen, Johan
2014. Chapter 8. Variable type framing in Spanish constructions of directed motion. In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 15], ► pp. 269 ff.
Pedersen, Johan
2016. Spanish constructions of directed motion – a quantitative study. In Corpus-based Approaches to Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 19], ► pp. 105 ff.
Pedersen, Johan
2019. Verb-based vs. schema-based constructions and their variability: On the Spanish transitive directed-motion construction in a contrastive perspective. Linguistics 57:3 ► pp. 473 ff.
Peña Cervel, María Sandra
2017. Chapter 6. Revisiting the English resultative family of constructions. In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58], ► pp. 175 ff.
Peña-Cervel, M. Sandra
2016. Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying Fake Reflexive Resultatives*. Australian Journal of Linguistics 36:4 ► pp. 502 ff.
Pijpops, Dirk, Dirk Speelman & Antal van den Bosch
2022. Generating hypotheses for alternations at low and intermediate levels of schematicity. The use of Memory-based Learning. Linguistics Vanguard 8:1 ► pp. 305 ff.
Piunno, Valentina
2020. Partially filled constructions in some Romance languages. Schematicity and semantic predictability. Romanica Olomucensia 32:1 ► pp. 143 ff.
Proost, Kristel
2017. Chapter 1. The role of verbs and verb classes in identifying German search-constructions. In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58], ► pp. 17 ff.
Sullivan, Karen
2016. Integrating constructional semantics and conceptual metaphor. Constructions and Frames 8:2 ► pp. 141 ff.
Uhrig, Peter
2015. Why the Principle of No Synonymy is Overrated. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 63:3 ► pp. 323 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.