Article published in:Cognitive and Empirical Pragmatics: Issues and perspectives
Edited by Gregory Bochner, Philippe De Brabanter, Mikhail Kissine and Daniela Rossi
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 25] 2011
► pp. 195–208
Squib: A deflationary account of invited inferences
This squib reconsiders Geis & Zwicky’s influential proposal on Invited Inference, according to which conditionals are regularly “perfected” to biconditionals. We first show that the “regularity” assumption attached to conditional perfection is doubtful in light of established experimental findings concerning other logical terms, such as Some and or and the conjunction and. We then review existing conditional data with the aim of making them cohere with these other experimental findings. We argue that (a) the process that leaves the impression of a biconditional reading (the acceptance of a fallacious argument such as the Affirmation of the Consequent) arises only after all participants detect a violation on-line from what is essentially a surprising minor premise and that; (b) some participants make an effort to adjust to such unexpected violations at a relatively small cognitive cost in order to accept invalid arguments while others persist in rejecting whatever follows and at a greater cognitive cost. Both of these features of conditional processing undermine claims from Geis & Zwicky’s proposal.
Published online: 05 December 2011
Cited by 3 other publications
Martin, Fabienne, Hamida Demirdache, Isabel García del Real, Angeliek van Hout & Nina Kazanina
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.