Based on natural language use, we examine the contextual environment of some negative constructions (e.g., Punctuality is not her forte/best attribute). Previous findings show that, as predicted by the view of default nonliteral interpretations, such negative constructions are interpreted nonliterally by default: (a) when presented in isolation, they are interpreted sarcastically and rated as sarcastic compared to affirmative counterparts; (b) when embedded in equally strongly biasing contexts, they are processed faster in sarcastically than in literally biasing contexts (Giora et al., 2013; Giora, Drucker et al., 2014). Here we test a third prediction that, unlike affirmative sarcasm, (c) such negative utterances will convey a sarcastic interpretation and their natural environment will echo their nonsalient (sarcastic) interpretation rather than their salience-based (literal) interpretation (Giora et al., 2010, 2013). Findings from 2 corpus-based studies of (Hebrew and English) negative constructions lend usage-based support to the view of default nonliteral interpretations (Giora et al., 2010, 2013; Giora, Drucker et al., 2014). They show that when occurring in natural discourses, such utterances communicate sarcasm significantly more often than their alternative affirmatives. Their neighboring utterances further reflect their nonsalient sarcastic interpretation rather than their salience-based nonsarcastic interpretation.
2012Comprehension processes of verbal irony: The effects of salience, egocentric context, and allocentric theory of mind. Metaphor and Symbol, 27(3), 217–242.
Beardsley, Monroe C
1958Aesthetics. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Colston, Herbert L., & Raymond W. Gibbs Jr
2002Are irony and metaphor understood differently?Metaphor and Symbol, 171, 57–80.
2006Reactions to irony in discourse: Evidence for the least disruption principle. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(8), 1239–1256.
Eviatar, Zohar, & Marcel Adam Just
2006Brain correlates of discourse processing: An fMRI investigation of irony and conventional metaphor comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 44(12), 2348–2359.
Fein, Ofer, Menahem Yeari & Rachel Giora
2014On the priority of salience-based interpretations: The case of irony. Intercultural Pragmatics, 12(1).
2014Testing theories of irony processing using eye-tracking and ERPs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication.
Filik, Ruth, & Linda M. Moxey
2010The on-line processing of written irony. Cognition, 116(3), 421–436.
Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr
1986aComprehension and memory for nonliteral utterances: The problem of sarcastic indirect requests. Acta Psychologica, 621, 41–57.
Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr
1986bOn the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1151, 3–15.
Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr
1994The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr
2002A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics, 341, 457–486.
Giora, Rachel
1995On irony and negation. Discourse processes, 19(2), 239–264.
Giora, Rachel
1997Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 71, 183–206.
Giora, Rachel
2003On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Giora, Rachel
2007“A good Arab is not a dead Arab – a racist incitement”: On the accessibility of negated concepts. In I. Kecskés, and L.R. Horn (eds.) Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Intercultural Aspects, 129–162. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2011b“Your baby is no longer an infant”. On metaphor as context. In Michael Gluzman & Orly Lubin (eds.), Intertextuality in literature and culture, 235–247. Tel Aviv: Hakibbuz Hameuchad. (In Hebrew)
Giora, Rachel
2014When negatives are easier to understand than affirmatives: The case of negative sarcasm. In Chungmin Lee and Pierre Larrivée (eds.). In press.
Giora, Rachel, Ari Drucker, Ofer Fein & Itamar Mendelson
2014Default sarcastic interpretations: On the priority of nonsalient interpretations. Discourse Processes. In press.
Giora, Rachel & Ofer Fein
1999On understanding familiar and less-familiar figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1601–1618.
Giora, Rachel, Ofer Fein, Jonathan Ganzi, Natalie Alkeslassy Levi & Hadas Sabah
2005Negation as mitigation: the case of negative irony. Discourse Processes, 391, 81–100.
Giora, Rachel, Ofer Fein, Dafna Laadan, Joe Wolfson, Michal Zeituny, Ran Kidron, Ronie Kaufman & Ronit Shaham
2007Expecting irony: Context vs. salience-based effects. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(2), 119–146.
2010Negation as a metaphor-inducing operator. In L. Horn (ed.), The expression of negation, 225–256. Mouton de Gruyter series “The expression of cognitive categories” under the general editorship of Wolfgang Klein and Stephen Levinson.
2009Does an “ironic situation” favor an ironic interpretation. Cognitive poetics: Goals, gains and gaps, 383–399. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Giora, Rachel & Inbar Gur
2003Irony in conversation: salience and context effects. In B. Nerlich, Z. Todd, V. Herman and D. Clarke (eds.) Polysemy: Flexible Patterns of Meanings in Language and Mind, 297–316. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
1984Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In Schiffrin, D. (ed.), Meaning, Form and Use in Context (GURT ‘84), 11–42. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Horn, R. Laurence
1989A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Horn, R. Laurence
1993Economy and redundancy in a dualistic model of natural language. In Shore, S., & Vilkuna, M. (eds.), SKY – Yearbook of the Linguistic Association of Finland, 33–72.
Ivanko, Stacey L., & Penny M. Pexman
2003Context incongruity and irony processing. Discourse Processes, 35(3), 241–279.
Katz, Albert N. & Penny M. Pexman
1997Interpreting figurative statements: Speaker occupation can change metaphor to irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 12(1), 19–41.
Kotthoff, Helga
2003Responding to irony in different contexts: On cognition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(9), 1387–1411.
2016. When Negatives Are Easier to Understand Than Affirmatives: The Case of Negative Sarcasm. In Negation and Polarity: Experimental Perspectives [Language, Cognition, and Mind, 1], ► pp. 127 ff.
2016. The ironic operation: Revisiting the components of ironic meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 91 ► pp. 16 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.