Article published in:
New Perspectives on Utterance Interpretation and Implicit Contents
Edited by Daniela Rossi and Nicolas Ruytenbeek
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 28] 2014
► pp. 318
Akimoto, Yoritaka, Shiho Miyazawa, & Toshiaki Muramoto
2012Comprehension processes of verbal irony: The effects of salience, egocentric context, and allocentric theory of mind. Metaphor and Symbol, 27(3), 217–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beardsley, Monroe C
1958Aesthetics. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Colston, Herbert L., & Raymond W. Gibbs Jr
2002Are irony and metaphor understood differently? Metaphor and Symbol, 171, 57–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W
2014Dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 359–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eisterhold, Jodi, Salvatore Attardo & Diana Boxer
2006Reactions to irony in discourse: Evidence for the least disruption principle. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(8), 1239–1256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eviatar, Zohar, & Marcel Adam Just
2006Brain correlates of discourse processing: An fMRI investigation of irony and conventional metaphor comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 44(12), 2348–2359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fein, Ofer, Menahem Yeari & Rachel Giora
2014On the priority of salience-based interpretations: The case of irony. Intercultural Pragmatics, 12(1).
Filik, Ruth, Hartmut Leuthold, Katie Wallington & Jemma Page
2014Testing theories of irony processing using eye-tracking and ERPs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filik, Ruth, & Linda M. Moxey
2010The on-line processing of written irony. Cognition, 116(3), 421–436. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr
1986aComprehension and memory for nonliteral utterances: The problem of sarcastic indirect requests. Acta Psychologica, 621, 41–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1986bOn the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1151, 3–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2002A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics, 341, 457–486. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel
1995On irony and negation. Discourse processes, 19(2), 239–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 71, 183–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007“A good Arab is not a dead Arab – a racist incitement”: On the accessibility of negated concepts. In I. Kecskés, and L.R. Horn (eds.) Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Intercultural Aspects, 129–162. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2011aWill anticipating irony facilitate it immediately? In Dynel, M. (ed.), The pragmatics of humour across discourse domains, 19–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011b“Your baby is no longer an infant”. On metaphor as context. In Michael Gluzman & Orly Lubin (eds.), Intertextuality in literature and culture, 235–247. Tel Aviv: Hakibbuz Hameuchad. (In Hebrew)Google Scholar
2014When negatives are easier to understand than affirmatives: The case of negative sarcasm. In Chungmin Lee and Pierre Larrivée (eds.). In press.
Giora, Rachel, Ari Drucker, Ofer Fein & Itamar Mendelson
2014Default sarcastic interpretations: On the priority of nonsalient interpretations. Discourse Processes. In press.Google Scholar
Giora, Rachel & Ofer Fein
1999On understanding familiar and less-familiar figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1601–1618. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel, Ofer Fein, Jonathan Ganzi, Natalie Alkeslassy Levi & Hadas Sabah
2005Negation as mitigation: the case of negative irony. Discourse Processes, 391, 81–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel, Ofer Fein, Dafna Laadan, Joe Wolfson, Michal Zeituny, Ran Kidron, Ronie Kaufman & Ronit Shaham
2007Expecting irony: Context vs. salience-based effects . Metaphor and Symbol, 22(2), 119–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel, Ofer Fein, Nili Metuki & Pnina Stern
2010Negation as a metaphor-inducing operator. In L. Horn (ed.), The expression of negation, 225–256. Mouton de Gruyter series “The expression of cognitive categories” under the general editorship of Wolfgang Klein and Stephen Levinson.Google Scholar
Giora, Rachel, Ofer Fein, Ronie Kaufman, Dana Eisenberg & Shani Erez
2009Does an “ironic situation” favor an ironic interpretation. Cognitive poetics: Goals, gains and gaps, 383–399. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Giora, Rachel & Inbar Gur
2003Irony in conversation: salience and context effects. In B. Nerlich, Z. Todd, V. Herman and D. Clarke (eds.) Polysemy: Flexible Patterns of Meanings in Language and Mind, 297–316. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel, Elad Livnat, Ofer Fein, Anat Barnea, Rakefet Zeiman & Iddo Berger
2013Negation generates nonliteral interpretations by default. Metaphor and Symbol, 281, 89–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel, Moshe Raphaely, Ofer Fein & Elad Livnat
2014Resonating with contextually inappropriate interpretations: The case of irony. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 443–445. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel, Eran Zaidel, Nachum Soroker, Gila Batori & Asa Kasher
2000Differential effects of right-and left-hemisphere damage on understanding sarcasm and metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1–2), 63–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givoni, Shir, Rachel Giora, & Dafna Bergerbest
2013How speakers alert addressees to multiple meanings. Journal of Pragmatics, 48(1), 29–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1975Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds.), Speech acts. Syntax and semantics, Vol. 31, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hasson, Uri, Galia Avidan, Hagar Gelbard, Ignacio Vallines, Michal Harel, Nancy Minshew & Marlene Behrmann
2009Shared and idiosyncratic cortical activation patterns in autism revealed under continuous real‐life viewing conditions. Autism Research, 2(4), 220–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horn, R. Laurence
1984Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In Schiffrin, D. (ed.), Meaning, Form and Use in Context (GURT ‘84), 11–42. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1989A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1993Economy and redundancy in a dualistic model of natural language. In Shore, S., & Vilkuna, M. (eds.), SKY – Yearbook of the Linguistic Association of Finland, 33–72.Google Scholar
Ivanko, Stacey L., & Penny M. Pexman
2003Context incongruity and irony processing. Discourse Processes, 35(3), 241–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Albert N. & Penny M. Pexman
1997Interpreting figurative statements: Speaker occupation can change metaphor to irony. Metaphor and Symbol, 12(1), 19–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga
2003Responding to irony in different contexts: On cognition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(9), 1387–1411. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan
2011Phrasal irony: Its form, function and exploitation. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(6), 1786–1800. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pexman, Penny M., Todd R. Ferretti & Albert N. Katz
2000Discourse factors that influence on-line reading of metaphor and irony. Discourse Processes, 291, 201–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pexman, Penny M. & Kara M. Olineck
2002Understanding irony how do stereotypes cue speaker intent? Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21(3), 245–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Martin & Simon Garrod
2013An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 329–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Z
2003Miss Keane strikes back. https://​www​.fanfiction​.net​/s​/1466130​/1​/Miss​-Keane​-Strikes​-Back (Retrieved on January 14th, 2013)
Stephens, Greg J., Lauren J. Silbert & Uri Hasson
Veale, Tony
2012Exploding the creativity myth: The computational foundations of linguistic creativity. London New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
2013Humorous similes. Humor, 26(1), 3–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 13 other publications

Dynel, Marta
2017. The Irony of Irony: Irony Based on Truthfulness. Corpus Pragmatics 1:1  pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo
Giora, Rachel
2016.  In Negation and Polarity: Experimental Perspectives [Language, Cognition, and Mind, 1],  pp. 127 ff. Crossref logo
Giora, Rachel
2020.  In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10],  pp. 211 ff. Crossref logo
Giora, Rachel & Israela Becker
2019. S/he is not the Most Sparkling Drink in the Pub Global Vs. Local Cue – Which Reigns Supreme?. Metaphor and Symbol 34:3  pp. 141 ff. Crossref logo
Giora, Rachel, Ofer Fein & Vered Heruti
2020. Whether Verbal or Visual, Affirmative or Negative, Tautologies are Not Tautologies. Metaphor and Symbol 35:2  pp. 97 ff. Crossref logo
Giora, Rachel, Shir Givoni, Vered Heruti & Ofer Fein
2017. The Role of Defaultness in Affecting Pleasure: The Optimal Innovation Hypothesis Revisited. Metaphor and Symbol 32:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Giora, Rachel, Inbal Jaffe, Israela Becker & Ofer Fein
2018. Strongly attenuating highly positive concepts. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:1  pp. 19 ff. Crossref logo
Giora, Rachel, Dalia Meytes, Ariela Tamir, Shir Givoni, Vered Heruti & Ofer Fein
2017.  In Irony in Language Use and Communication [Figurative Thought and Language, 1],  pp. 219 ff. Crossref logo
Givoni, Shir, Dafna Bergerbest & Rachel Giora
2021.  In Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11],  pp. 241 ff. Crossref logo
Kapogianni, Eleni
2016. The ironic operation: Revisiting the components of ironic meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 91  pp. 16 ff. Crossref logo
Kolhatkar, Varada, Hanhan Wu, Luca Cavasso, Emilie Francis, Kavan Shukla & Maite Taboada
2020. The SFU Opinion and Comments Corpus: A Corpus for the Analysis of Online News Comments. Corpus Pragmatics 4:2  pp. 155 ff. Crossref logo
Stevens, Emmy
2019. Altijd leuk, zo’n ironische constructie!. Nederlandse Taalkunde 23:3  pp. 371 ff. Crossref logo
彭, 丽
2021. The Influence of Subject Familiarity on the Interpretation of Negative Constructions. Modern Linguistics 09:02  pp. 390 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 07 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.