Cover not available
Article published In:
New Perspectives on Utterance Interpretation and Implicit Contents
Edited by Daniela Rossi and Nicolas Ruytenbeek
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 28] 2014
► pp. 19–44

Is a general theory of utterance interpretation really possible?

| University of California, Santa Cruz

How realistic is it to assume that psychologists, linguists, philosophers and others may someday be able to construct a general theory of utterance interpretation? Over the past 50 years, scholars have uncovered a tremendous amount about the processes and products of human language understanding. We have proposed a huge assortment of theories to explain how very specific types of utterances may be interpreted (e.g., syntactically ambiguous expressions, figurative language, pragmatic implicatures), with some of us working hard to articulate more comprehensive theories that could be applicable to all aspects of utterance interpretation. Yet the empirical data reveals many complexities that, on the surface, make some doubt whether a general theory of utterance interpretation is a feasible possibility. This paper describes some of these complexities in the empirical literature, focusing on figurative language use. I go on to argue that language scholars must embrace the diverse ways that people use and understand utterances and suggest concrete steps that we all should take if we are to one day find a more general theory, one which is perhaps tied to how people engage in any intentional action.

Published online: 28 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.28.02gib
References
Allbritton, David, Gail McKoon, and Richard Gerrig
1994 “Metaphor-based schemas and text representations: Making connections through conceptual metaphors”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 211: 1–14.Google Scholar
Bergen, Benjamin
2012 Louder than words: The new science of how the mind creates meaning. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, Lera, and Michael Ramscar
2002 “The roles of body and mind in abstract thought”. Psychological Science 131: 185–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowdle, Brian, and Dedre Gentner
2005 “The career of metaphor”. Psychological Review 1121: 193–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H
1996 Using language. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, Fernanda, and Nicole Patson
2007 “The ‘good enough’ approach to language comprehension”. Language & Linguistics Compass 11: 71–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, Fernanda, Kiel Christianson, and Andrew Hollingworth
2001 “Misinterpretations of garden-path sentences: Implications for models of sentence processing and reanalysis”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 301: 3–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Francik, Ellen, and Herbert H. Clark
1985 “How to make requests that overcome obstacles to compliance”. Journal of Memory and Language 241: 560–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, Dedre, Brian Bowdle, Phillip Wolff, and Consuelo Boronat
2001 “Metaphor is like analogy”. In The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science, ed. by Dedre Gentner, Keith Holyoak, and Boicho Kokinov, 199–253. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W
1986a “What makes some indirect speech acts conventional?” Journal of Memory and Language 251: 181–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1986b “On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1151: 3–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990 “Comprehending figurative referential descriptions”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 161: 56–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond
1992 “What do idioms really mean?” Journal of Memory and Language311: 485–506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W
1994 The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1999 Intentions in the experience of meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Embodiment and cognitive science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2010 “The wonderful, chaotic, creative, heroic, challenging world of researching and applying metaphor: A celebration of the past and some peeks into the future”. In Metaphor in the real world, ed. by Lynne Cameron et al., 1–20. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory”. Discourse Processes 481: 529–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Walking the walk while thinking about the talk: Embodied interpretation of metaphorical narratives”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 42 (4): 363–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W., and Herbert Colston
(Eds.) 2007 Irony in language and thought: A cognitive science reader. New York: Erlbaum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Interpreting figurative meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W., and Jennifer O’Brien
1990 “Idioms and mental imagery: The metaphorical motivation for idiomatic meaning”. Cognition 361: 35–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W., and Guy C. Van Orden
2010 “Adaptive cognition without massive modularity”. Language & Cognition 21: 147–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R., Nandini Nayak, and Cooper Cutting
1989 “How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing”. Journal of Memory and Language 281: 576–593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W., Josephine M. Bogdanovich, Jeffrey R. Sykes, and Dale J. Barr
1997 “Metaphor in idiom comprehension”. Journal of Memory and Language 371: 141–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W., Lisa Strom, and Michael J. Spivey-Knowlton
1997 “Conceptual metaphor in mental imagery for proverbs”. Journal of Mental Imagery 211: 83–110.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W., Jessica J. Gould, and Michael Andric
2006 “Imagining metaphorical actions: Embodied simulations make the impossible plausible”. Imagination, Cognition, & Personality 251: 221–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W., Lima, Paula, and Edson Francuzo
2004 “Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience”. Journal of Pragmatics 361: 1189–1210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W., Markus Tendahl, and Lacey Okonski
2011 “Inferring pragmatic messages from metaphor”. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 71: 3–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, Sam
2001 Understanding figurative language: From metaphor to idioms. NewYork: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Henry P
1989 Studies in the ways of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hamblin, Jennifer, and Raymond W. Gibbs
1999 “Why you can’t kick the bucket as you slowly die: Verbs in idiom understanding”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 391: 25–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 “Processing the meanings of what speakers say and implicate”. Discourse Processes 351: 59–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jorgensen, Julia, George A. Miller, and Dan Sperber
1984 “Test of the mention theory of irony”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1131: 112–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keysar, Boaz, Dale J. Barr, and William S. Horton
1998 “The egocentric basis of language use: Insights from a processing approach”. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences 71: 46–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kreuz, Roger J., and Sam Glucksberg
1989 “How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1181: 374–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kreuz, Roger J., and Kristen E. Link
2002 “Asymmetries in the perception of verbal irony”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 211: 127–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kreuz, Roger J., Max A. Kassler, Lori Coppenrath, and Bonnie McLain Allen
1999 “Tag questions and common ground effects in the perception of verbal irony”. Journal of Pragmatics 311: 1685–1700. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, Maryellen C., and Mark S. Seidenberg
2006 “Constraint satisfaction accounts of lexical and sentence comprehension”. In Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 2nd Edition, ed. by Matthew Traxler, and Morton A. Gernsbacher, 581–611. London: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matlock, Teenie, Michael Ramscar, and Lera Boroditsky
2005 “The experiential link between spatial and temporal language”. Cognitive Science 291: 655–664. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McElree, Brian, Steven Frisson, and Martin J. Pickering
2006 “Deferred interpretations: Why starting Dickens is taxing but reading Dickens isn’t”. Cognitive Science 301: 115–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, Allen
1979 “Indirect speech acts are not strictly conventional”. Linguistic Inquiry 101: 353–356.Google Scholar
Nayak, Nandini, and Raymond W. Gibbs
1990 “Conceptual knowledge in the interpretation of idioms”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1191: 315–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Daniel, and Teenie Matlock
2007 “The integration of figurative language and static depictions: An eye-movement study of fictive motion”. Cognition 1021: 129–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John
1979 “Metaphor”. In Metaphor and thought, ed. by Andrew Ortony, 56–93. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1995 Relevance: Communication and cognition (second edition). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spivey, Michael
2007 The continuity of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Utsumi, Akira
2000 “Verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from nonirony”. Journal of Pragmatics 321: 1777–1806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tendahl, Markus, and Raymond W. Gibbs
2008 “Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive linguistics and relevance theory”. Journal of Pragmatics 401: 1823–1864. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Nicole L., and Raymond W. Gibbs.
2007 “Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension”. Cognitive Science 311: 721–731. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Degand, Liesbeth & Ludivine Crible
2021. Chapter 1. Discourse markers at the peripheries of syntax, intonation and turns. In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325], ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Gibbs, Raymond W.
2023. Pragmatic complexity in metaphor interpretation. Cognition 237 ► pp. 105455 ff. DOI logo
Gibbs, Raymond W.
2023. What’s figurative about figurative language?. Lingua 287 ► pp. 103520 ff. DOI logo
Ruytenbeek, Nicolas
2017. The Comprehension of Indirect Requests: Previous Work and Future Directions. In Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line [Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 11], ► pp. 293 ff. DOI logo
Ruytenbeek, Nicolas
2023. Directives (with a special emphasis on requests). In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.