Article published in:
New Perspectives on Utterance Interpretation and Implicit Contents
Edited by Daniela Rossi and Nicolas Ruytenbeek
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 28] 2014
► pp. 4570
References

References

Bach, Kent and Robert M. Harnish
1979Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bayraktaroğlu, Arin
2001 “Advice-giving in Turkish: ‘Superiority’ or ‘Solidarity’.” In Linguistic Politeness across Boundaries: The Case of Greek and Turkish, ed. by A. Bayraktaroğlu and M. Sifianou, 177–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bax, Marcel
1999 “Ritual Levelling: The balance between the Eristic and the Contractual Motive in Hostile Verbal encounters in Medieval Romance and Early Modern Drama.” In Historical Dialogue Analysis, ed. by A.H. Jucker, G. Fritz, and F. Lebsanft, 35–80. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 “Rites of Rivalry. Ritual Interaction and the Emergence of Indirect Language Use.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 3: 61–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Binkley, Timothy
1979 “The Principle of Expressibility.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 39 (3): 307–325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre
1990The Logic of Practice. Translated by R. Nice. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan and Jane Demmen
2011 “Nineteenth-century English PolitenessJournal of Historical Pragmatics 12 (1/2): 49–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan
1976 “Is Sybil There? Some American English Directives.” Language in Society 5: 25–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1977Wait for me Roller-skate. In Child Discourse, ed. by C. Mitchell-­Kernan and S. Ervin-Tripp, 165–188. New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, Sam
2003 “The Psycholinguistics of Metaphor.” Trends in Cognitive Science 7: 92–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul
1975 “Logic and conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech acts, ed. by P. Cole and J. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Edward
1977Beyond Culture. Garden City, New York: Anchor/Doubleday.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Sarah and Smith, Rachel
2001 “Polysp: A Polysystemic, Phonetically-Rich Approach to Speech Understanding.” Italian Journal of Linguistics – Rivista di Linguistica 13: 99–188.Google Scholar
Healey, Patrick
1997 “Expertise or Expert-ese?: The Emergence of Task-oriented Sub-languages.” In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 7th–10th August, Stanford University, California, ed. by M.G. Shafto and P. Langley, 301–306.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R.
1984 “A New Taxonomy for Pragmatic Inference: Q-based and R-based Implicature.” In Meaning, Form and Use in Context, ed. by D. Schiffrin, 11–42. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Huls, Erica and Wijk, Carel van
2012 “The Development of a Directive Repertoire in Context: A Case Study of a Dutch Speaking Young Child.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 83–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiesling, Scott & Gosh Johnson, Erica
2010 “Four Forms of Interactional Indirection.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 292–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
1973“‘The Logic of Politeness or Minding your p’s and q’s.’” Papers from the 9th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society , 292–305.
Lee, James, and Pinker, Steven
2010Rationales for Indirect Speech: The Theory of the Strategic Speaker. Psychological Review 117: 785–807. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2014The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lempert, Michael
2012“Indirectness.” In The Handbook of Intercultural Discourse and Communication, ed. by C. Bratt Paulston, S.F. Kiesling & E.S. Rangel, 180–204. Oxford: Wiley-­Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1995“Three levels of meaning.” In Grammar and meaning: Essays in honour of Sir John Lyons, ed. by F. Palmer, 90–115. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lumsden, Joanne, Miles, Lynden, Richardson, Michael, Smith, Carlene & Macrae, Neil
2012 “Who syncs?: Social Motives and Interpersonal Coordination.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48 (3): 746–751. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McElree, Brian and Johanna Nordlie
1999 “Literal and Figurative Interpretations Are Computed in Equal Time.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 6: 486–494. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miles, Lynden, Nind, Louise, Henderson, Zoe & Macrae, Neil
2010 “Moving memories: Behavioral Synchrony and Memory for Self and Others.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology46 (2): 457–460. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Gregory
2007The Development of Semantic Co-ordination in Dialogue: The Role of Direct Interaction. PhD diss., Department of Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London.
2011 “The Emergence of Procedural Conventions in Dialogue.” In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society . Boston, USA. http://​homepages​.inf​.ed​.ac​.uk​/gmills​/Mills​_2011​_Procedural​.pdf
Morgan, Marcyliena
1991 “Indirectness and Interpretation in African American Women’s Discourse.” Pragmatics 1 (4): 421–451. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Stephen, Nowak, Martin and Lee, James
2008 “The Logic of Indirect Speech.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 833–838. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pugmire, David
1998Rediscovering Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Récanati, François
1994 “Contextualism and Anti-Contextualism in the Philosophy of Language.” In Foundations of Speech Act Theory, ed. by S. Tsohatzidis, 156–166. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben
1995Crossing: Language and Ethnicity Among Adolescents. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Searle, John
1975 “Indirect Speech Acts.” In Syntax and semantics. Vol. III: Speech acts, ed. by P. Cole and J. Morgan, 59–82. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Amy and Gregory Murphy
1993 “Can you Answer a Question for me? Models of Processing Indirect Speech Acts.” Journal of Memory and Language32: 211–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sifianou, Maria
1997 “Politeness and Off-Record Indirectness.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 126: 163–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
2010“‘Direct’ and ‘indirect’ communicative acts in semiotic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (2): 337–353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John
1969Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Soltys, Jessica, Marina Terkourafi and Napoleon Katsos
2014 “Disentangling Politeness Theory and the Strategic Speaker Approach: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Predictions.” Intercultural Pragmatics 11 (1): 31–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
2010 “Abduction and Identity in Family Interaction: Ventriloquizing as Indirectness.” Journal of Pragmatics42: 307–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina
2011a “The puzzle of indirect speech.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2861–2865. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011b “Why direct speech is not a natural default: Rejoinder to Steven Pinker’s ‘Indirect Speech, Politeness, Deniability, and Relationship Negotiation’.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2869–2871. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Jennifer
1986The dynamics of discourse: A pragmatic analysis of confrontational interaction. PhD Diss. University of Lancaster.
Trosborg, Ann
1995Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Traci, Paul Drew and John Local
2011 “Responding Indirectly.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2434–2451. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

Ameka, Felix K. & Marina Terkourafi
2019. What if…? Imagining non-Western perspectives on pragmatic theory and practice. Journal of Pragmatics 145  pp. 72 ff. Crossref logo
Chen, Xi & Jiayi Wang
2021. First order and second order indirectness in Korean and Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 178  pp. 315 ff. Crossref logo
Culpeper, Jonathan & Marina Terkourafi
2017.  In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness,  pp. 11 ff. Crossref logo
Meibauer, Jörg
2019. What is an indirect speech act?. Pragmatics & Cognition 26:1  pp. 61 ff. Crossref logo
Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa
2019.  In The Praxis of Indirect Reports [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 21],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa
2019.  In The Praxis of Indirect Reports [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 21],  pp. 137 ff. Crossref logo
Ruytenbeek, Nicolas
2020. Do indirect requests communicate politeness? An experimental study of conventionalized indirect requests in French email communication . Journal of Politeness Research 16:1  pp. 111 ff. Crossref logo
Sifianou, Maria & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2017.  In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness,  pp. 571 ff. Crossref logo
Yuan, Wen, Francis Y. Lin & Richard P. Cooper
2019. Relevance theory, pragmatic inference and cognitive architecture. Philosophical Psychology 32:1  pp. 98 ff. Crossref logo
Zhou, Ling & Shaojie Zhang
2022. A multifunctional analysis of off-record indirectness in Chinese interactions. Language Sciences 90  pp. 101459 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.