Article published In:
New Perspectives on Utterance Interpretation and Implicit ContentsEdited by Daniela Rossi and Nicolas Ruytenbeek
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 28] 2014
► pp. 45–70
Edited by Daniela Rossi and Nicolas Ruytenbeek
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 28] 2014
► pp. 45–70
The importance of being indirect
A new nomenclature for indirect speech
Standard accounts of indirect speech share two assumptions: that indirect speech always has a direct alternative, and that it is strategic. I survey a number of cases that challenge one or both of these assumptions and propose a new nomenclature for indirect speech that crucially includes, in addition to cases where indirect speech is strategic, cases where it is ‘enabling.’ The enabling potential of indirect speech lies in allowing us to give voice to thoughts or experiences that may be possible to express propositionally only in part. In such cases, the speaker does not start off with a direct alternative in mind but rather uses speech to invite the hearer to help her develop an inchoate thought. Including these cases under the same scheme allows us to consider ways other than recognition of the speaker’s intention in which indirect meanings may arise, such as through shared experience and the interlocutors’ habitus. The proposed nomenclature thus yields a multi-faceted view of indirect speech that goes beyond its current, formally driven, understanding.
References (46)
Bach, Kent and Robert M. Harnish. 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bayraktaroğlu, Arin. 2001. “Advice-giving in Turkish: ‘Superiority’ or ‘Solidarity’.” In Linguistic Politeness across Boundaries: The Case of Greek and Turkish, ed. by A. Bayraktaroğlu and M. Sifianou, 177–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 
Bax, Marcel. 1999. “Ritual Levelling: The balance between the Eristic and the Contractual Motive in Hostile Verbal encounters in Medieval Romance and Early Modern Drama.” In Historical Dialogue Analysis, ed. by A.H. Jucker, G. Fritz, and F. Lebsanft, 35–80. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2002. “Rites of Rivalry. Ritual Interaction and the Emergence of Indirect Language Use.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 31: 61–106.
Binkley, Timothy. 1979. “The Principle of Expressibility.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 39 (3): 307–325.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Translated by R. Nice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, Jonathan and Jane Demmen. 2011. “Nineteenth-century English Politeness” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12 (1/2): 49–81.
Ervin-Tripp, Susan. 1976. “Is Sybil There? Some American English Directives.” Language in Society 51: 25–66.
. 1977. Wait for me Roller-skate. In Child Discourse, ed. by C. Mitchell-Kernan and S. Ervin-Tripp, 165–188. New York: Academic Press.
Glucksberg, Sam. 2003. “The Psycholinguistics of Metaphor.” Trends in Cognitive Science 71: 92–96.
Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. “Logic and conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech acts, ed. by P. Cole and J. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
Hall, Edward. 1977. Beyond Culture. Garden City, New York: Anchor/Doubleday.
Hawkins, Sarah and Smith, Rachel. 2001. “Polysp: A Polysystemic, Phonetically-Rich Approach to Speech Understanding.” Italian Journal of Linguistics – Rivista di Linguistica 131: 99–188.
Healey, Patrick. 1997. “Expertise or Expert-ese?: The Emergence of Task-oriented Sub-languages.” In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 7th–10th August, Stanford University, California, ed. by M.G. Shafto and P. Langley, 301–306.
Horn, Laurence R. 1984. “A New Taxonomy for Pragmatic Inference: Q-based and R-based Implicature.” In Meaning, Form and Use in Context, ed. by D. Schiffrin, 11–42. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Huls, Erica and Wijk, Carel van. 2012. “The Development of a Directive Repertoire in Context: A Case Study of a Dutch Speaking Young Child.” Journal of Pragmatics 441: 83–103.
Kiesling, Scott & Gosh Johnson, Erica. 2010. “Four Forms of Interactional Indirection.” Journal of Pragmatics 421: 292–306.
Lakoff, Robin. 1973. “‘The Logic of Politeness or Minding your p’s and q’s.’”
Papers from the 9th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society
, 292–305.
Lee, James, and Pinker, Steven. 2010. Rationales for Indirect Speech: The Theory of the Strategic Speaker. Psychological Review 1171: 785–807.
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lempert, Michael. 2012. “Indirectness.” In The Handbook of Intercultural Discourse and Communication, ed. by C. Bratt Paulston, S.F. Kiesling & E.S. Rangel, 180–204. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Levinson, Stephen C. 1995. “Three levels of meaning.” In Grammar and meaning: Essays in honour of Sir John Lyons, ed. by F. Palmer, 90–115. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lumsden, Joanne, Miles, Lynden, Richardson, Michael, Smith, Carlene & Macrae, Neil. 2012. “Who syncs?: Social Motives and Interpersonal Coordination.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48 (3): 746–751.
McElree, Brian and Johanna Nordlie. 1999. “Literal and Figurative Interpretations Are Computed in Equal Time.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 61: 486–494.
Miles, Lynden, Nind, Louise, Henderson, Zoe & Macrae, Neil. 2010. “Moving memories: Behavioral Synchrony and Memory for Self and Others.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology46 (2): 457–460.
Mills, Gregory. 2007. The Development of Semantic Co-ordination in Dialogue: The Role of Direct Interaction. PhD diss., Department of Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London.
. 2011. “The Emergence of Procedural Conventions in Dialogue.” In
Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
. Boston, USA. [URL]
Morgan, Marcyliena. 1991. “Indirectness and Interpretation in African American Women’s Discourse.” Pragmatics 1 (4): 421–451.
Pinker, Stephen, Nowak, Martin and Lee, James. 2008. “The Logic of Indirect Speech.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1051: 833–838.
Pugmire, David. 1998. Rediscovering Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Récanati, François. 1994. “Contextualism and Anti-Contextualism in the Philosophy of Language.” In Foundations of Speech Act Theory, ed. by S. Tsohatzidis, 156–166. London and New York: Routledge.
Rampton, Ben. 1995. Crossing: Language and Ethnicity Among Adolescents. New York: Longman.
Searle, John. 1975. “Indirect Speech Acts.” In Syntax and semantics. Vol. III: Speech acts, ed. by P. Cole and J. Morgan, 59–82. New York: Academic Press.
Shapiro, Amy and Gregory Murphy. 1993. “Can you Answer a Question for me? Models of Processing Indirect Speech Acts.” Journal of Memory and Language321: 211–229.
Sifianou, Maria. 1997. “Politeness and Off-Record Indirectness.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 1261: 163–79.
Silverstein, Michael. 2010. “‘Direct’ and ‘indirect’ communicative acts in semiotic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (2): 337–353.
Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Soltys, Jessica, Marina Terkourafi and Napoleon Katsos. 2014. “Disentangling Politeness Theory and the Strategic Speaker Approach: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Predictions.” Intercultural Pragmatics 11 (1): 31–56.
Tannen, Deborah. 2010. “Abduction and Identity in Family Interaction: Ventriloquizing as Indirectness.” Journal of Pragmatics421: 307–316.
Terkourafi, Marina. 2011a. “The puzzle of indirect speech.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 2861–2865.
. 2011b. “Why direct speech is not a natural default: Rejoinder to Steven Pinker’s ‘Indirect Speech, Politeness, Deniability, and Relationship Negotiation’.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 2869–2871.
Thomas, Jennifer. 1986. The dynamics of discourse: A pragmatic analysis of confrontational interaction. PhD Diss. University of Lancaster.
Trosborg, Ann. 1995. Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Walker, Traci, Paul Drew and John Local. 2011. “Responding Indirectly.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 2434–2451.
Cited by (22)
Cited by 22 other publications
Elder, Chi-Hé & Luna Filipović
Elder, Chi-Hé & Michael Haugh
2024. The role of inference and inferencing in pragmatic models of communication. Journal of Pragmatics 229 ► pp. 71 ff. 
Haugh, Michael
2024. Chapter 7. Ostensible offers, politeness and sincere hypocrisy. In The Pragmatics of Hypocrisy [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 343], ► pp. 162 ff.
Wang, Keyuan, Ling Zhou & Shaojie Zhang
2023. Explicit and implicit (im)politeness: A corpus-based study of the Chinese formulaic expression “Nikezhen+X”. Lingua 291 ► pp. 103560 ff.
Filipović, Luna
2022. The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Miscommunication in UK Police Interviews and US Police Interrogations. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 37:2 ► pp. 297 ff.
Tosun, Sümeyra & Luna Filipović
2022. Lost in translation, apparently: Bilingual language processing of evidentiality in a Turkish–English Translation and judgment task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 25:5 ► pp. 739 ff.
Zhou, Ling & Shaojie Zhang
2022. A multifunctional analysis of off-record indirectness in Chinese interactions. Language Sciences 90 ► pp. 101459 ff.
Chen, Xi & Jiayi Wang
2021. First order and second order indirectness in Korean and Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 178 ► pp. 315 ff.
Elder, Chi-Hé
2021. Speaker Meaning, Commitment and Accountability. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 48 ff.
Elder, Chi-Hé
2024. Pragmatic Inference,
Terkourafi, Marina
2021. Inference and Implicature. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 30 ff.
Terkourafi, Marina
2023. A Speech-Act Theoretic Analysis of White (Prosocial) Lies. In Sbisà on Speech as Action [Philosophers in Depth, ], ► pp. 245 ff.
Ruytenbeek, Nicolas
2020. Do indirect requests communicate politeness?An experimental study of conventionalized indirect requests in French email communication. Journal of Politeness Research 16:1 ► pp. 111 ff.
Ruytenbeek, Nicolas
Ameka, Felix K. & Marina Terkourafi
2019. What if…? Imagining non-Western perspectives on pragmatic theory and practice. Journal of Pragmatics 145 ► pp. 72 ff.
Meibauer, Jörg
Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa
2019. Preliminaries. In The Praxis of Indirect Reports [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 21], ► pp. 1 ff.
Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa
2019. Politeness in Indirect Reporting. In The Praxis of Indirect Reports [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 21], ► pp. 137 ff.
Yuan, Wen, Francis Y. Lin & Richard P. Cooper
2019. Relevance theory, pragmatic inference and cognitive architecture. Philosophical Psychology 32:1 ► pp. 98 ff.
Culpeper, Jonathan & Marina Terkourafi
2017. Pragmatic Approaches (Im)politeness. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 11 ff.
Sifianou, Maria & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2017. (Im)politeness and Cultural Variation. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 571 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Fundamentals of Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 13 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.