Article published in:
New Perspectives on Utterance Interpretation and Implicit Contents
Edited by Daniela Rossi and Nicolas Ruytenbeek
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 28] 2014
► pp. 7195
References

References

Brown-Schmidt, Sarah, and Joy E. Hanna
2011 “Talking in another person’s shoes: Incremental perspective-taking in language processing”. Dialogue and Discourse 2: 11–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn
2007 “How many pragmatic systems are there?” In Saying, Meaning, Referring. Essays on the Philosophy of François Recanati, ed. by Maria J. Frapolli, 18–48. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chemla, Emmanuel, and Benjamin Spector
2011 “Experimental evidence for embedded implicatures”. Journal of Semantics 28 (3): 359–400. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel
2006 “Recanati on the semantics/pragmatics distinction”. Crítica 38 (112): 35–68.Google Scholar
Grandy, Richard E.
1989 “On Grice on language”. Journal of Philosophy 86: 514–525. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, Henry P.
1957 “Meaning”. Philosophical Review 66: 377–388. Reprinted in Grice, Henry P. 1989, 213–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice Henry P.
1975 “Logic and Conversation”. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Reprinted in Grice, Henry P. 1989, 22–40.Google Scholar
Grice, Henry P.
1989Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jary, Mark
2013 “Two types of implicature: material and behavioural”. Mind & Language 28 (5): 638–660. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mazzarella, Diana
2011 “Accessibility and relevance: a fork in the road”. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 23: 11–20.Google Scholar
2013 “ ‘Optimal relevance’ as a pragmatic criterion: the role of epistemic vigilance”. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 25: 20–45.Google Scholar
Mazzone, Marco
2009 “Pragmatics and cognition: intentions and pattern recognition in context”, International Review of Pragmatics 1 (2): 321–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “Pragmatica lessicale: processi associativi o inferenziali?” In Linguaggio e cervello. Atti del XLII Covegno della società di linguistica italiana, 2, ed. by Pier Marco Bertinetto, Valentina Bambini, and Irene Ricci. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
2011 “Schemata and associative processes in pragmatics”. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2148–2159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “Attention to the speaker. The conscious assessment of utterance interpretation in working memory”, Language & Communication 33: 106–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Recanati, François
1995The alleged priority of literal interpretation, Cognitive Science 19: 207–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002Does linguistic communication rest on inference? Mind & Language 17 (1&2): 105–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2007 “Reply to Carston”. In Saying, Meaning, Referring. Essays on the Philosophy of François Recanati, ed. by Maria J. Frapolli, 49–54. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1986/1995Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1998 “The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon”. In Thought and language, ed. by Peter Carruthers, and Jill Boucher, 184–200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 “Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading”. Mind & Language 17 (1&2): 3–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi, and Deirdre Wilson
2010 “Epistemic vigilance”. Mind & Language 24 (4): 359–393. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
1999The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Robyn Carston
2007 “A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference ad Hoc concepts”. In Pragmatics (Palgrave Advances in Linguistics), ed. by Noel Burton-Roberts, 230–260. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Tomoko Matsui
1998 “Recent approaches to bridging: Truth, coherence, relevance”. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 1–28.Google Scholar
Yeh, Wenchi, and Lawrence W. Barsalou
2006 “The situated nature of concepts”. American Journal of Psychology 119 (3): 349–384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Mazzarella, Diana & Filippo Domaneschi
2018. Presuppositional effects and ostensive-inferential communication. Journal of Pragmatics 138  pp. 17 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.