Cover not available
Article published In:
New Perspectives on Utterance Interpretation and Implicit Contents
Edited by Daniela Rossi and Nicolas Ruytenbeek
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 28] 2014
► pp. 71–95

Is inference necessary to pragmatics?

| University College London
The assumption that pragmatic processes are inferential is standardly held by Gricean and post-Gricean pragmatic theories. Recently, however, it has been challenged by accessibility-based approaches to pragmatics. Recanati (2002, 2004) proposes that primary pragmatic processes (i.e. processes that contribute to the recovery of the explicit content of the utterance) are underpinned by a simple dynamics of activations-and-associations, with no need for any further (specifically inferential) step or ‘confirmatory stage’ to warrant the selected interpretation. Mazzone (2009, 2011) extends this account to secondary pragmatic processes (i.e. processes of implicature derivation): the recovery of the explicit and implicit content of the utterance is the result of a unified associative comprehension process. This paper argues that, on close analysis, the role played by information about the speaker’s mental states (i.e. her beliefs and intentions) indicates that inference is indispensable in an adequate account of pragmatic processing.
Published online: 28 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.28.04maz
References
Brown-Schmidt, Sarah, and Joy E. Hanna
2011 “Talking in another person’s shoes: Incremental perspective-taking in language processing”. Dialogue and Discourse 21: 11–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn
2007 “How many pragmatic systems are there?” In Saying, Meaning, Referring. Essays on the Philosophy of François Recanati, ed. by Maria J. Frapolli, 18–48. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chemla, Emmanuel, and Benjamin Spector
2011 “Experimental evidence for embedded implicatures”. Journal of Semantics 28 (3): 359–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García-Carpintero, Manuel
2006 “Recanati on the semantics/pragmatics distinction”. Crítica 38 (112): 35–68.Google Scholar
Grandy, Richard E.
1989 “On Grice on language”. Journal of Philosophy 861: 514–525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Henry P.
1957 “Meaning”. Philosophical Review 661: 377–388. Reprinted in Grice, Henry P. 1989, 213–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice Henry P.
1975 “Logic and Conversation”. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Reprinted in Grice, Henry P. 1989, 22–40.Google Scholar
Grice, Henry P.
1989 Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jary, Mark
2013 “Two types of implicature: material and behavioural”. Mind & Language 28 (5): 638–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazzarella, Diana
2011 “Accessibility and relevance: a fork in the road”. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 231: 11–20.Google Scholar
2013 “ ‘Optimal relevance’ as a pragmatic criterion: the role of epistemic vigilance”. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 251: 20–45.Google Scholar
Mazzone, Marco
2009 “Pragmatics and cognition: intentions and pattern recognition in context”, International Review of Pragmatics 1 (2): 321–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Pragmatica lessicale: processi associativi o inferenziali?” In Linguaggio e cervello. Atti del XLII Covegno della società di linguistica italiana, 2, ed. by Pier Marco Bertinetto, Valentina Bambini, and Irene Ricci. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
2011 “Schemata and associative processes in pragmatics”. Journal of Pragmatics 431: 2148–2159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Attention to the speaker. The conscious assessment of utterance interpretation in working memory”, Language & Communication 331: 106–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Recanati, François
1995 The alleged priority of literal interpretation, Cognitive Science 191: 207–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 Does linguistic communication rest on inference? Mind & Language 17 (1&2): 105–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2007 “Reply to Carston”. In Saying, Meaning, Referring. Essays on the Philosophy of François Recanati, ed. by Maria J. Frapolli, 49–54. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1986/1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1998 “The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon”. In Thought and language, ed. by Peter Carruthers, and Jill Boucher, 184–200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 “Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading”. Mind & Language 17 (1&2): 3–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi, and Deirdre Wilson
2010 “Epistemic vigilance”. Mind & Language 24 (4): 359–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
1999 The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Robyn Carston
2007 “A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference ad Hoc concepts”. In Pragmatics (Palgrave Advances in Linguistics), ed. by Noel Burton-Roberts, 230–260. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Tomoko Matsui
1998 “Recent approaches to bridging: Truth, coherence, relevance”. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 101: 1–28.Google Scholar
Yeh, Wenchi, and Lawrence W. Barsalou
2006 “The situated nature of concepts”. American Journal of Psychology 119 (3): 349–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Allott, Nicholas
2023. Encapsulation, inference and utterance interpretation. Inquiry ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mazzarella, Diana & Filippo Domaneschi
2018. Presuppositional effects and ostensive-inferential communication. Journal of Pragmatics 138 ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Ryzhova, Margarita & Vera Demberg
2023. Processing cost effects of atypicality inferences in a dual-task setup. Journal of Pragmatics 211 ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.