Article published In:
Computational Construction Grammar and Constructional ChangeEdited by Katrien Beuls and Remi van Trijp
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30] 2016
► pp. 115–146
Edited by Katrien Beuls and Remi van Trijp
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30] 2016
► pp. 115–146
Unidirectionality as a cycle of convention and innovation
Micro-changes in the grammaticalization of [be going to INF]
The present study combines recent interest on the impact of unconventional individual language use on grammar change (Petré and Van de Velde 2014, De Smet 2016) with research on how conventional grammar impacts on language users. To better understand their interplay, I will zoom in on the interaction of unconventional and conventional behaviour of individuals in the developments of [be Ving] and [be going to|go to INF]. Apart from enhancing our understanding of the long-term effects of the urge to be expressive, an important outcome of the analysis will be that it is precisely the way in which the spiral of the conventional leads to the unconventional to the conventional again, which may help explain the phenomenon of unidirectionality in language change.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Unconventionality creates conventionality creates unconventionality…
- 3.The semanticization of progressive aspect in [be Ving]
- 3.1The grammaticalizing effect of unintended system dynamics
- 3.2From system dynamics to unconventional innovation
- 4.Data and methodology for identifying extravagance
- 4.1In search of extravagance
- 4.2Size matters
- 4.3Brief sketch of the grammaticalization of [be going to INF]
- 5.Analysis of the competition between [go
to INF] and [be
going to INF]
- 5.1Introduction
- 5.2Analysis by generation
- 5.3Idiosyncratic variation
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References
Beckner, Clay, Richard Blythe, Joan Bybee, Morten H. Christiansen, William Croft, Nick C. Ellis, John Holland, Jinyun Ke, Diane Larsen-Freeman, & Tom Schoenemann
2009 “Language is a Complex Adaptive System: Position Paper.” Language learning 59 (1): 1–26.
Bergs, Alexander
2005 Social Networks and Historical Sociolinguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 
Blythe, Richard A., and William Croft
2012 “S-curves and the Mechanisms of Propagation in Language Change.” Language 88 (2): 269–304.
Brinton, Laurel
1996 Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Budts, Sara, and Peter Petré
2016 “Reading the Intentions of be going to. On the Subjectification of Future Markers.” Folia Linguistica Historica 371: 1–32.
Bybee, Joan
2010 Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Croft, William
2000 Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. London: Longman.
De Smet, Hendrik
2016 “How Gradual Change Progresses: The Interaction between Convention and Innovation.” Language Variation and Change 281: 83–102.
De Smet, Hendrik, and Liesbet Heyvaert
2011 “The Meaning of the English Present Participle.” English Language and Linguistics 15 (3): 473–498.
De Wit, Astrid, and Frank Brisard
2014 “A Cognitive Grammar Account of the Semantics of the English Present Progressive.” Journal of Linguistics 50 (1): 49–90.
Detges, Ulrich, and Richard Waltereit
2002 “Grammaticalization vs. Reanalysis: A Semantic-Pragmatic Account of Functional Change in Grammar.” Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 211: 151–195.
Disney, Steve
2009 “The Grammaticalisation of be going to
.” Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics 151: 63–82.
Fitzmaurice, Susan
2004 “The Meanings and Uses of the Progressive Construction in an Early Eighteenth-Century English Network.” In Studies in the History of the English Language II, ed. by Anne Curzan, and Kimberly Emmons, 131–174. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Fludernik, Monika
1992 “The Historical Present Tense in English Literature: An Oral pattern and its Literary Adaptation.” Language and Literature 171: 77–107.
Garrett, Andrew
2012 “The Historical Syntax Problem: Reanalysis and Directionality.” In Grammatical Change: Origins, Nature, Outcomes, ed. by Dianne Jonas et al., 52–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haspelmath, Martin
1999 “Why is Grammaticalization Irreversible?” Linguistics 371: 1043–1068.
Hilpert, Martin
2008 Germanic Future Constructions: A Usage-Based Approach to Language Change. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth C. Traugott
2003 Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jäger, Gerhard, and Anette Rosenbach
2008 “Priming and Unidirectional Language Change.” Theoretical Linguistics 34 (2): 85–113.
Jespersen, Otto
1917 Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: Høst.
Keller, Rudi
1994 On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. London & New York: Routledge.
Kemenade, Ans van, and Bettelou Los
2006 “Discourse Adverbs and Clausal Syntax in Old and Middle English.” In The Handbook of the History of English, ed. by Ans van Kemenade, and Bettelou Los, 224–48. Oxford: Blackwell.
Killie, Kristin
2008 “From Locative to Durative to Focalized? The English Progressive and ‘PROG Imperfective Drift’.” In English historical linguistics 2006, vol. 1: Historical syntax and morphology. Selected papers from the fourteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 14), Bergamo, 21–25 August 2006, ed. by Gotti Maurizio, Marina Dossena, and Richard Dury, 69–88. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Klein, Wolfgang
1994 Time in Language. London: Routledge.
Kranich, Svenja
2010 The Progressive in Modern English: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization and Related Changes. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi.
Krug, Manfred G.
2000 Emerging English modals: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization (Topics in English Linguistics 32). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Mair, Christian
2004 “Corpus Linguistics and Grammaticalisation Theory: Statistics, Frequencies, and Beyond.” In Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalization in English, ed. by Hans Lindquist, and Christian Mair, 121–150. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Meillet, Antoine
1912 “L’évolution des formes grammaticales [The evolution of grammatical forms].” Scientia 121: 130–148.
Michaelis, Laura A.
2003 “Headless Constructions and Coercion by Construction.” In Mismatch: Form-Function Incongruity and the Architecture of Grammar (CSLI publications 115), ed. by Elaine Francis, and Laura A. Michaelis, 259–310. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Nesselhauf, Nadja
2010 “The Development of Future Time Expressions in Late Modern English: Redistribution of Forms or Change in Discourse?” English Language and Linguistics 14 (2): 163–186.
Nevalainen, Terttu, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg, and Heikki Mannila
2011 “The Diffusion of Language Change in Real-Time: Progressive and Conservative Individuals and the Time Depth of Change.” Language Variation and Change 231: 1–43.
Petré, Peter
2013 EEBOCorp, version 1.0. Leuven: University of Leuven Linguistics Department.
2014 Constructions and Environments: Copular, Passive and Related Constructions in Old and Middle English (Oxford Studies in the History of English 4). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2016 “Grammaticalization by Changing Co-Text Frequencies, or why [be Ving] Became the ‘Progressive’.” English Language and Linguistics. 20 (1): 31–54.
Forthcoming for 2017. “The extravagant progressive. An experimental corpus study on the history of emphatic [be Ving].” English Language and linguistics 211.
Petré, Peter, and Freek Van de Velde
2014 “Tracing Real-Life Agents’ Individual Progress in Ongoing Grammaticalization.” In How Grammaticalization Processes Create Grammar (workshop held at EVOLANG10, Vienna, Austria, 14–17 April 2014) Proceedings, ed. by Luc Steels, and Remi van Trijp. ([URL])
Pickering, Martin J., and Victor S. Ferreira
2008 “Structural Priming: A Critical Review.” Psychological Bulletin 134 (3): 427–459. (accessed online at: [URL]) doi: .
.Pons-Sanz, Sara
2014 The Language of Early English Literature: from Cædmon to Milton. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena, and Arja Nurmi
2011 “Grammaticalization and Language Change in the Individual.” In Handbook of Grammaticalisation, ed. by Heiko Narrog, and Bernard Heine, 251–262. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sankoff, G.
2006 “Age: Apparent Time and Real Time.” Elsevier Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Second Edition, Article Number: LALI: 01479.
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
2008 “ ‘All that he endeavoured to prove was…’: On the Emergence of Grammatical Constructions in Dialogic Contexts.” In Language in Flux: Dialogue Coordination, Language Variation, Change and Evolution, ed. by Robin Cooper, and Ruth Kempson, 143–177. London: Kings College.
2010 “Dialogic Contexts as Motivations for Syntactic Change.” In Studies in the History of the English language V. Variation and Change in English Grammar and Lexicon: Contemporary Approaches, ed. by Robert A. Cloutier, Anne Marie Hamilton-Brehm, and William A. Kretzschmar, Jr., 11–27. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
2012 “On the Persistence of Ambiguous Linguistic Context over Time: Implications for Corpus Research on Micro-Changes”. In Corpus Linguistics and Variation in English: Theory and Description, ed. by Joybrato Mukherjee, and Magnus Hüber, 231–246. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
2015 “Toward a Coherent Account of Grammatical Constructionalization.” In Diachronic Construction Grammar, ed. by Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer, and Spike Gildea, 51–80. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Traugott, Elizabeth C., and Graeme Trousdale
2013 Constructionalization and Constructional Changes (Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van de Pol, Nikki
2016 The Development of the Absolute Construction in English: Between Bird’s Eye View and Magnifying Glass. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Leuven.
Westergaard, Marit
2009 “Word order in Old and Middle English: The Role of Information Structure and First Language Acquisition.” Diachronica 26 (1): 65–102.
Cited by
Cited by 16 other publications
Anthonissen, Lynn & Peter Petré
2019. Grammaticalization and the linguistic individual: new avenues in lifespan research. Linguistics Vanguard 5:s2 
Bardenstein, Ruti & Avi Gvura
2023. Motion verbs and future constructions: the case of Hebrew omed le-V ‘standing (up) to-V’/‘(be) about to-V’. Journal of Pragmatics 218 ► pp. 99 ff.
Budts, Sara & Peter Petré
2020. Putting connections centre stage in diachronic Construction Grammar. In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27], ► pp. 318 ff.
Detges, Ulrich
Dietrich, Nadine
2024. The seamlessness of grammatical innovation: the case of be going to (revisited). Folia Linguistica 0:0
Ivorra Ordines, Pedro & Belén López Meirama
Kuzai, Einat & Hava Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot
2022. Analogical Interference in Constructionalization: The Emergence of the Hebrew Desiderative ba le-X Y. Cognitive Semantics 8:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
Neels, Jakob
2020. Lifespan change in grammaticalisation as frequency-sensitive automation: William Faulkner and thelet aloneconstruction. Cognitive Linguistics 31:2 ► pp. 339 ff.
Noël, Dirk
2017. The development of non-deontic be bound to in a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar perspective. Lingua 199 ► pp. 72 ff.
Noël, Dirk
2019. The decline of the Deontic nci construction in Late Modern English. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:1 ► pp. 22 ff.
Noël, Dirk
2019. The author and the text in radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar, or why historical linguists have started analysing text again. Functions of Language 26:1 ► pp. 56 ff.
Ordines, Pedro Ivorra
2023.
Por mí como si te operas. Constructional idioms of rejection from a constructionist approach. Yearbook of Phraseology 14:1 ► pp. 89 ff.
PETRÉ, PETER
2017. Connecting the past and the present – a response to Pentrel. English Language and Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 283 ff.
PETRÉ, PETER
2017. The extravagant progressive: an experimental corpus study on the history of emphatic [beVing]. English Language and Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 227 ff.
Taverniers, Miriam
Ungerer, Tobias & Stefan Hartmann
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.