References

References

Benati, A.
(2001) A comparative study of the effects of processing instruction and output-based instruction on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. Language Teaching Research, 5, 95–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) The effects of processing instruction and its components on the acquisition of gender agreement in Italian. Language Awareness 13, 67–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) The effects of PI, TI and MOI in the acquisition of English simple past tense. Language Teaching Research, 9, 67–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benati, A., & Lee, J.
(2008) Grammar Acquisition and Processing Instruction: Secondary And Cumulative Effects. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Processing instruction and discourse. Continuum.Google Scholar
Benati, A., Lee, J., & Hikima, N.
(2010) Exploring the effects of processing instruction on discourse-level interpretation tasks with the Japanese passive construction. In A. Benati & J. F. Lee (Eds.), Processing instruction and discourse (pp. 148–177). Continuum.Google Scholar
Benati, A., & Batziou, M.
(2017) The relative effects of isolated and combined structured-input and structured-output on the acquisition of English causative. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 57, 265–288. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019) Discourse and long-term effects of isolated and combined structured-input and structured-output on the acquisition of English causative form. Language Awareness, 28, 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cadierno, T.
(1995) Formal instruction from a processing perspective: An investigation into the Spanish past tense. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 179–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, A. C.
(2002) The effects of processing instruction on the acquisition of ser and estar . Hispania, 85, 308–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Processing instruction and Spanish ser and estar: Forms with semantic-aspectual value. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 119–141). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R., Salaberry, R., Robinson, P., & Harrington, M.
(2002) What gets processed in processing instruction? A commentary on Bill VanPatten’s processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52(4), 805–823. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keating, G., & Farley, A.
(2008) Processing instruction, meaning-based output instruction, and meaning-based drills: Impacts on classroom L2 acquisition of Spanish object pronouns. Hispania, 19, 639–650.Google Scholar
Lee, J.
(2004) On the generalizability, limits, and potential future directions of processing instruction research. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 311–323). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kasprowicz, R., & Marsden, E.
(2017) Towards ecological validity in research into input-based practice: Form spotting can be as beneficial as form-meaning practice. Applied Linguistics, 39, 886–911. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, E.
(2006) Exploring input processing in the classroom: An experimental comparison of processing instruction and enriched input. Language Learning, 56, 507–566. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, E., & Chen, H. Y.
(2011) The roles of structured input activities in processing instruction and the kinds of knowledge they promote. Language Learning, 61, 1058–1098. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morgan-Short, K., & Bowden, H. W.
(2006) Processing instruction and meaningful output-based instruction: Effects on second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 31–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J., & Ortega, L.
(2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanz, C.
(2004) Computer delivered implicit versus explicit feedback in processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 241–255). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Toth, P. D.
(2006) Processing instruction and a role for output in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 56, 319–385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B.
(1996) Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Ablex.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T.
(1993) Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Sanz, C.
(1995) From input to output: Processing instruction and communicative tasks. In F. R. Eckman, D. Highland, P. W. Lee, J. Mileham & R. R. Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 169–185). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Oikennon, S.
(1996) Explanation vs. structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 495–510. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Fernández, C.
(2004) The long-term effects of processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 273–289). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., Farmer, J., & Clardy, C.
(2009) Processing instruction and meaning-based output instruction: A response to Keating and Farley (2008). Hispania, 92, 116–126.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., Inclezan, D., Salazarand, H., & Farley, A.
(2009) Processing instruction and dictogloss: A study on object pronouns and word order in Spanish. Foreign Language Annals, 42, 557–575. CrossrefGoogle Scholar