References

References

Benati, A.
(2001) A comparative study of the effects of processing instruction and output-based instruction on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. Language Teaching Research, 5, 95–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004a) The effects of structured input and explicit information on the acquisition of Italian future tense. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 207–255). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2004b) The effects of processing instruction and its components on the acquisition of gender agreement in Italian. Language Awareness, 13, 67–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) The effects of PI, TI, and MOI in the acquisition of English simple past tense. Language Teaching Research, 9, 67–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cadierno, T.
(1995) Formal instruction from a processing perspective: An investigation into the Spanish past tense. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 179–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farhat, A., & Benati, A.
(2018) The effects of motivation and processing instruction in the acquisition of Modern Standard Arabic gender agreement. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 2, 60–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farley, A.
(2001a) Authentic processing instruction and the Spanish subjunctive. Hispania, 84, 289–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) The relative effects of processing instruction and meaning-based output instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 143–168). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2004a) The relative effects of processing instruction and meaning-based output instruction. In B. VanPatten (ed) Processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary (pp. 143–168). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2004b) Processing instruction and the Spanish subjunctive: Is explicit information needed? In B. VanPatten (ed) Processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary (pp. 227–239). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lee, J., & Benati, A.
(2007a) Delivering processing instruction in classrooms and virtual contexts: Research and practice. Equinox.Google Scholar
(2007b) Second language processing: An analysis of theory, problems and possible solutions. Continuum.Google Scholar
Lee, J. G., & VanPatten, B.
(1995) Making communicative language teaching happen. McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Leow, R.
(1997) The effects of input enhancement and text length on adult L2 readers’ comprehension and intake in second language acquisition. Applied Language Learning, 8, 151–182.Google Scholar
Meguro, Y.
(2017) Textual enhancement, grammar learning, reading comprehension, and tag questions. Language Teaching Research, 23, 58–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sharwood-Smith, M.
(1991) Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research 7, 118–132.Google Scholar
Shook, D. J.
(1994) What foreign language reading recalls reveal about the input-to-intake phenomenon. Applied Language Learning, 10, 39–76.Google Scholar
Overstreet, M.
(1998) Text enhancement and content familiarity: The focus of learner attention. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2, 229–258.Google Scholar
Simard, Simard D.
(2009) Differential effects of textual enhancement formats on intake. System, 37, 124–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B.
(2004a) Input processing in SLA. In B. VanPatten (Ed.) Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 5–31). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Oikennon, S.
(1996) Explanation vs. structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 495–510. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Wong, W.
(2004) Processing instruction and the French causative: Another replication. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 97–118). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Winke, P.
(2013) The effects of input enhancement on grammar learning and comprehension. A modified replication of Lee (2007) with eye-movement data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 323–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wong, W.
(2002) Textual enhancement and simplified input: Effects n L2 comprehension and acquisition of non-meaningful grammatical form. Applied Language Learning, 13, 17–45.Google Scholar
(2004) Processing instruction in French: The roles of explicit information and structured input. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 187–205). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar