Chapter published in:
Prediction in Second Language Processing and Learning
Edited by Edith Kaan and Theres Grüter
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 12] 2021
► pp. 4868


Bader, M., & Häussler, J.
(2010) Word order in German: A corpus study. Lingua, 120(3), 717–762. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barr, D. J.
(2008) Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 457–474. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barr, D. J., Gann, T. M., & Pierce, R. S.
(2011) Anticipatory baseline effects and information integration in visual world studies. Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 201–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J.
(2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P.
(2001) PRAAT, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9/10), 341–345.Google Scholar
Bornkessel, I., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D.
(2002) Grammar overrides frequency: Evidence from the online processing of flexible word order. Cognition, 85(2), B21–B30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, C. G., & Cooke, H.
(2009) Lexical competition during second-language listening: Sentence context, but not proficiency, constrains interference from the native lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(4), 1029–1040. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C.
(2006) Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(1), 3–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Some notes on the Shallow Structure Hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(3), 693–706. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cunnings, I.
(2017) Parsing and working memory in bilingual sentence processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(4), 659–678. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dijkgraaf, A., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Duyck, W.
(2017) Predicting upcoming information in native-language and non-native-language auditory word recognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(5), 917–930. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019) Prediction and integration of semantics during L2 and L1 listening. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(7), 881–900. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dink, J. W., & Ferguson, B.
(2015) eyetrackingR: An R library for eye-tracking data analysis. Retrieved from http://​www​.eyetrackingr​.com
Donnelly, S., & Verkuilen, J.
(2017) Empirical logit analysis is not logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 28–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duñabeitia, J. A., Crepaldi, D., Meyer, A. S., New, B., Pliatsikas, C., Smolka, E., & Brysbaert, M.
(2018) Multipic: A standardized set of 750 drawings with norms for six European languages. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(4), 808–816. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dussias, P. E., Valdés Kroff, J. R., Guzzardo Tamargo, R. E., & Gerfen, C.
(2013) When gender and looking go hand in hand: Grammatical gender processing in L2 Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(2), 353–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frenck-Mestre, C., Kim, S. K., Choo, H., Ghio, A., Herschensohn, J., & Koh, S.
(2019) Look and listen! The online processing of Korean case by native and non-native speakers. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(3), 385–404. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gerth, S., Otto, C., Felser, C., & Nam, Y.
(2017) Strength of garden-path effects in native and non-native speakers’ processing of object–subject ambiguities. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(2), 125–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grüter, T., Lau, E., & Ling, W.
(2020) How classifiers facilitate predictive processing in L1 and L2 Chinese: The role of semantic and grammatical cues. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(2), 221–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Häussler, J., & Bader, M.
(2011) Grammar- versus frequency-driven syntactic ambiguity resolution: The case of double-object constructions. In M. Lamers & P. de Swart (Eds.), Case, word order and prominence: Interacting cues in language production and comprehension (pp. 273–301). Springer.Google Scholar
Hopp, H.
(2015) Semantics and morphosyntax in predictive L2 sentence processing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 53(3), 277–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) The bilingual mental lexicon in L2 sentence processing. Second Language, 17, 5–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H., & Lemmerth, N.
(2018) Lexical and syntactic congruency in L2 predictive gender processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(1), 171–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huettig, F.
(2015) Four central questions about prediction in language processing. Brain Research, 1626, 118–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ito, A., Corley, M., & Pickering, M. J.
(2018) A cognitive load delays predictive eye movements similarly during L1 and L2 comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(2), 251–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ito, A., Pickering, M. J., & Corley, M.
(2018) Investigating the time-course of phonological prediction in native and non-native speakers of English: A visual world eye-tracking study. Journal of Memory and Language, 98, 1–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L.
(2003) The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 133–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B.
(2017) lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matin, E., Shao, K. C., & Boff, K. R.
(1993) Saccadic overhead: Information-processing time with and without saccades. Perception & Psychophysics, 53(4), 372–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H., & Bates, D.
(2017) Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 305–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mirman, D., Dixon, J. A., & Magnuson, J. S.
(2008) Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 475–494. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitrofanova, N., Sekerina, I. A., Sauermann, A., Gagarina, N., & Westergaard, M.
(2019, June 27). Cross-linguistic differences in predictive use of grammatical case in Russian and German (comparing monolingual and bilingual children) [Conference presentation]. International Symposium on Bilingualism (ISB), University of Alberta, Canada.
Mitsugi, S., & MacWhinney, B.
(2016) The use of case marking for predictive processing in second language Japanese. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(1), 19–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peters, R. E., Grüter, T., & Borovsky, A.
(2015) Anticipatory and locally coherent lexical activation varies as a function of language proficiency. In D. C. Noelle, R. Dale, A. S. Warlaumont, J. Yoshimi, T. Matlock, C. D. Jennings, & P. P. Maglio (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1865–1870). Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Pozzan, L., & Trueswell, J.
(2016) Second language processing and revision of garden-path sentences: A visual world study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(3), 636–643. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://​www​.R​-project​.org/
Schlenter, J.
(2019) Predictive language processing in late bilinguals: Evidence from visual-world eye-tracking (Doctoral dissertation). University of Potsdam. publish.UP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Bergen, G., & Flecken, M.
(2017) Putting things in new places: Linguistic experience modulates the predictive power of placement verb semantics. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 26–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar