Chapter published in:
Second Language Acquisition Theory: The legacy of Professor Michael H. Long
Edited by Alessandro G. Benati and John W. Schwieter
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 14] 2022
► pp. 2976
References
Bailey, C.-J.
(1973) Variation and linguistic theory. Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D.
(1971) Inherent variability and variable rules. Foundations of Language, 7 , 457–492.Google Scholar
Borshchev, B., & Filippov, A.
(2004) From system dynamics and discrete event to practical agent based modeling: Reasons, techniques, tools. The 22nd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, 25–29 July 25, Oxford, England.
Bresnan, J.
(2001) Lexical-functional syntax. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Meisel, J. M., & Pienemann, M.
(1983) Deutsch als Zweitsprache. Der Zweitspracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiter [German as a second language. The second language acquisition of immigrant workers]. Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Clyne, M.
(Ed.) (1981) Foreigner talk. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 28 .Google Scholar
De Bot, K.
(2016) Multi-competence and dynamic systems. In V. Cook & Li Wei (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic multi-competence (pp. 125–141). Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Bot, K., Lowie, W. M., & Verspoor, M. H.
(2007) A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10 (1), 7–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeCamp, D.
(1973) What do implicational scales imply? In C.-J. N. Bailey & R. W. Shuy (Eds.), New ways of analyzing variation in English (pp. 141–148). Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Dyson, B. P.
(2021) Dynamic variation in second language acquisition. A language processing perspective. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ebbinghaus, H.
(1885)  Über das Gedächtnis: Untersuchungen zur experimentellen Psychologie. Duncker & Humblot. English translation: Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. Columbia University 1913.Google Scholar
Feldman, D. P.
(2012) Chaos and fractals. An elementary introduction. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019) Chaos and dynamical systems. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hakuta, K.
(1974) Learning to speak a second language: What exactly does the child learn? In D. Dato (ed.), Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics 1975 (pp. 193–207). Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Han, Z. H.
(2004) Fossilisation in adult second language acquisition. Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hatch, E., & Lazaraton, A.
(1991) The research manual. Design and statistics for applied linguists. Heinle and Heinle.Google Scholar
Haznedar, B.
(1997) Child second language acquisition of English: A longitudinal case study of a Turkish-speaking child (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Durham University.
Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N.
(2003) Maturaltional constraints in SLA. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition research (pp. 539–587). Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kempen, G., & Hoenkamp, E.
(1987) An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 11 , 201–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W.
(1972) Sociolinguistic patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2006) The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27 (4), 590–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freemann, D., & Long, M. H.
(1991) An introduction to second language acquisition research. Longman.Google Scholar
Lenzing, A., Nicholas, H., & Roos, J.
(Eds.) (2019) Widening contexts for Processability Theory: Theories and issues. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lenzing, A., Pienemann, M., & Nicholas, H.
(2022) Lost in translation? On some key features of dynamical systems theorizing invoked in SLA research. In K. Kersten & A. Winsler (Eds) Understanding variability in second language acquisition, bilingualism and cognition. Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, T-Y., & Yorke, J.
(1975) Period three implies chaos. The American Mathematical Monthly, 82 (10), 985–992. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H.
(2003) Stabilization and fossilization. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition research (pp. 487–536). Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
May, R. M.
(1976) Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature, 261 (5560), 459–467. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. M., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M.
(1981) On determining developmental stages in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3 (2), 109–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. M.
(2011) First and second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, M.
(2009) Complexity. A guided tour. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nash, J. E., & Sutcliffe, J. V.
(1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I – A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10 (3), 282–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, H.
(1987) A comparative study of the acquisition of German as a first and as a second language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Monash University. Retrieved on 2 February 2022 from https://​monash​.hosted​.exlibrisgroup​.com​/MON:au​_everything:catau21186631810001751
Nicholas, H., Lenzing, A., & Roos, J.
(2019) How does PT’s view of acquisition relate to the challenge of widening perspectives on SLA? In A. Lenzing, H. Nicholas, & J. Roos (Eds.), Widening contexts for Processability Theory: Theories and issues (pp. 391–398). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(1980) The second language acquisition of immigrant children. In S. W. Felix (Ed.), Second language development. Trends and issues (pp. 41–56). Narr.Google Scholar
(1981) Der Zweitspracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiterkinder [The second language acquisition of immigrant children]. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
(1998) Language processing and second language development: Processability Theory. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) (ed.) Cross-Linguistic Aspects of Processability Theory. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) The psycholinguistic basis of PT. In M. Pienemann & J.-U. Keßler (Eds.), Studying Processability Theory (pp. 27–49). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) An outline of processability theory and its relationship to other approaches to SLA. Language Learning, 65 (1), 123–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., Johnston, M., & Brindley, G.
(1988) Constructing an acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10 , 217–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., & Lenzing, A.
(2020) Processability Theory. In B. VanPatten, G. D. Keating, & S. Wulff (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition. An introduction (3rd ed., pp. 162–191). Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., Lenzing, A., & Nicholas, H.
forthcoming). Can dynamic systems theory explain SLA? Unpublished manuscript, University of Paderborn, Germany.
Poincaré, J. H.
(1913) The foundations of science: Vol 1, Science and hypothesis; Vol II, The value of science; Vol III, Science and method (G. Halsted, Trans.). The Science Press. (Original works published in 1902 (Vol I), 1905 (Vol II), 1908 (Vol III)).Google Scholar
Rasmussen, N.
(1987) A new model of developmental constraints as applied to the Drosophila system. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 127 (3), 271–299. PMID:3431126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scheffer, M.
(2010) Foreseeing tipping points. Nature, 467, 411–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selinker, L.
(1972) Interlanguage. IRAL, 10 , 209–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A.
(1962) The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106 , 467–482.Google Scholar
Strogatz, S. H.
(2015) Nonlinear dynamics and chaos. With applications to physics, biology, chemistry and engineering (2nd ed.). Westview.Google Scholar
Verhulst, P.-F.
(1838) Notice sur la loi que la population poursuit dans son accroissement. Correspondance Mathématique et Physique, 10 , 113–121. (cited after Nicolas Bacaër 2011).Google Scholar
Watkins, C., Massey, D., Brooks, J., Ross, K., & Zellner, M. L.
(2013) Understanding the mechanisms of collective decision making in ecological restoration: An agent-based model of actors and organizations. Ecology and Society, 18 (2), 32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilensky, U.
(1999) NetLogo. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. Retrieved on 2 February 2022 from http://​ccl​.northwestern​.edu​/netlogo/
Wimsatt, W.
(1986) Developmental constraints, generative entrenchment and the innate-acquired distinction. In W. Bechtel. (ed.), Integrating scientific disciplines (pp. 185–208). Martinus Nijhoff. CrossrefGoogle Scholar