Chapter published in:
Second Language Acquisition Theory: The legacy of Professor Michael H. Long
Edited by Alessandro G. Benati and John W. Schwieter
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 14] 2022
► pp. 127142
References
Arroyo, D. C., & Yilmaz, Y.
(2018) An open for replication study: The role of feedback timing in synchronous computer-mediated communication. Language Learning, 68 , 942–972. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Canals, L., Granena, G., Yilmaz, Y., & Malicka, A.
(2020) Second language learners’ and teachers’ perceptions of delayed immediate corrective feedback in an asynchronous online setting: An exploratory study. TESL Canada Journal, 37 , 181–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2021) The relative effectiveness of immediate and delayed corrective feedback in video-based computer-mediated communication. Language Teaching Research. Advanced online publication. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M.
(2003) Implicit and explicit learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–348). Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. J.
(2001) Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206–257). Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H.
(2003) Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language, Learning & Technology, 7 , 50–80.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2005) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27 , 141–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R.
(2006) Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28 , 339–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elsey, J. W. B., Van Ast, V. A., & Kindt, M.
(2018) Human memory reconsolidation: A guiding framework and critical review of the evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 144 , 797–848. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goo, J.
(2016) Corrective feedback and working memory capacity: A replication. In G. Granena, D. O. Jackson, & Y. Yilmaz (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (pp. 279–302). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Granena, G.
(2013) Cognitive aptitudes for second language learning and the LLAMA Language Aptitude Test. In G. Granena & M. H. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 105–129). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019) Cognitive aptitudes and L2 speaking proficiency: Links between LLAMA and Hi-LAB. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41 (2), 313–336. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harmer, J.
(2007) The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Pearson.Google Scholar
Hatch, E. M.
(1978) Discourse analysis and second language acquisition. In E. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 401–435). Newbury House.Google Scholar
Heift, T., Nguyen, P., & Hegelheimer, V.
(2021) Technology-mediated corrective feedback. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), Corrective feedback in second language learning and teaching (pp. 226–250). Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, C.
(2020) Perfect timing? Exploring the effects of immediate and delayed corrective feedback, communication mode, and working memory on the acquisition of Spanish as a foreign language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University.
Lee, J. L. C., Nader, K., & Schiller, D.
(2017) An update on memory reconsolidation updating. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21 , 531–545. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, S., Zhu, Y., & Ellis, R.
(2016) The effects of the timing of corrective feedback on the acquisition of a new linguistic structure. The Modern Language Journal, 100 , 276–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H.
(1981) Input, interaction and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379 , 259–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1983a) Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4 , 126–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1983b) Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5 , 177–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1988) Instructed interlanguage development. In L. Beebe (Ed.), Issues in second language acquisition: Multiple perspectives (pp. 115–141). Newbury House.Google Scholar
(1991) Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. Foreign Language Research in Cross-Cultural Perspective, 2 , 39–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bahtia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.Google Scholar
to appear). The psycholinguistics of L2 interaction. In A. Godfroid & H. Hopp Eds. The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and psycholinguistics Routledge
Long, M. H., & Robinson, P.
(1998) Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom SLA (pp. 15–41). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M.
(2005) Second language research: Methodology and design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Brown, D.
(2015) Domain definition and search techniques in meta-analyses of L2 research (Or why 18 meta-analyses of feedback have different results). Second Language Research, 31 , 267–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, P.
(2014) Delayed versus immediate corrective feedback on orally produced passive errors in English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
(2021) The timing of corrective feedback. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), Corrective feedback in second language learning and teaching (pp. 322–340). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Révész, A., & Han, Z.
(2006) Task content familiarity, task type, and efficacy of recasts. Language Awareness, 15 , 160–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sheen, Y.
(2007) The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 301–322). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shintani, N., & Aubrey, S.
(2016) The effectiveness of synchronous and asynchronous written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy in a computer-mediated environment. The Modern Language Journal, 100 , 296–319. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R.
(2015) Does elicited imitation measure implicit knowledge? Evidence from the word-monitoring task. Language Learning, 65 , 860–895. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vafaee, P., Suzuki, Y., & Kachisnke, I.
(2017) Validating grammaticality judgment tests: Evidence from two new psycholinguistic measures. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39 , 59–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, Y.
(2012) The relative effects of explicit correction and recasts on two target structures via two communication modes. Language Learning, 62 , 1134–1169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback: The role of working memory capacity and language analytic ability. Applied Linguistics, 34 , 344–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) The role of exposure condition in the effectiveness of explicit correction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38 , 65–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, Y., & Yuksel, D.
(2011) Effects of communication mode and salience on recasts: A first exposure study. Language Teaching Research, 15 , 457–477. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, Y., & Granena, G.
(2021) Implicitness and explicitness in cognitive abilities and corrective feedback. A double dissociation? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43 (3), 523–550. CrossrefGoogle Scholar