Chapter published in:
Second Language Acquisition Theory: The legacy of Professor Michael H. Long
Edited by Alessandro G. Benati and John W. Schwieter
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 14] 2022
► pp. 211234
References
Bui, H. Y. G.
(2014) Task readiness: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence from topic familiarity, strategic planning, and proficiency levels. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 63–94). John Benjamins.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bui, G., Skehan, P., & Wang, Z.
(2018) Task condition effects on advanced level foreign language performance. In P. A. Malovrh & A. G. Benati (Eds.), The handbook of advanced proficiency in second language acquisition (pp. 219–237). John Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M.
(2001) Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 23–48). Longman.Google Scholar
(2018) Learning language through task repetition. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Bot, K.
(1992) A bilingual production model: Levelt’s “Speaking” model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13 , 1–24.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R.
(2007) Introduction: Situating the concept of practice. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2020) Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten, G. D. Keating, & S. Wulff (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 83–104). Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2005) Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3–36). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) The differential effects of three types of task planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral performance. Applied Linguistics, 30 , 474–509. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F.
(2005) The effect of careful within-task planning on oral and written task performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 167–192). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., & Skehan, P.
(1996) The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18 (3), 299–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3 , 185–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis in task-based performance: A synthesis of the Ealing research. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency investigating complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 199–220). John Benjamins.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) The effects of post-task activities on the accuracy of language during task performance. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69 , 249–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., & Tavakoli, P.
(2009) Lexical diversity and lexical selection: A comparison of native and non-native speaker performance. Language Learning, 59 (4), 866–896. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D. O., & Suethanapornkul, S.
(2013) The Cognition Hypothesis: A synthesis and meta-analysis of research on second language task complexity. Language Learning, 63 (2), 330–367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K.
(2011) Using pretask modelling to encourage collaborative learning opportunities. Language Teaching Research, 15 (2), 183–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, M.
(2009) Hitting the Mark: How can text organisation and response format affect reading test performance. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kormos, J.
(1999) Monitoring and self-repair. Language Learning, 49 , 303–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Speech production and second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2011) Speech production and the Cognition Hypothesis. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 39–60). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, C., Kormos, J., & Minn, D.
(2017) Task repetition and second language speech processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38 , 1–30.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J.
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Q.
(2014) Get it right in the end: The effects of post-task transcribing on learners’ oral performance. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 129–154). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H.
(2007a) Problems in SLA. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2007b) Recasts in SLA: The story so far. In M. H. Long, Problems in SLA (pp. 43–74). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2015) Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2016) Experimental perspectives on classroom interaction. In N. Markee (Ed.), Handbook of classroom discourse and interaction. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lynch, T.
(2001) Seeing what they meant: Transcribing as a route to noticing. English Language Teaching Journal, 55 , 124–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Learning from the transcripts of an oral communication task. ELT Journal, 61 , 311–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malicka, A., & Sasayama, S.
(April 2017) The importance of learning from the accumulated knowledge: Findings from a research synthesis on task complexity. Paper presented at the 7th Biennial International Conference on Task-Based Language Teaching, Barcelona, Spain.
Pang, F., & Skehan, P.
(2014) Self-reported planning behaviour and second language performance in narrative retelling. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 95–128). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2021) Performance profiles on second language speaking tasks. The Modern Language Journal, 105 (1), 371–390. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P.
(Ed.) (2011a) Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011b) Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–38). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) The Cognition Hypothesis, second language task demands, and the SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT (pp. 87–122). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P.
(2007) Task research and language teaching: Reciprocal relationships. In S. Fotos (Ed.), Form-meaning relationships in language pedagogy: Essays in honour of Rod Ellis. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2013) Nurturing noticing. In J. Bergsleithner, S. N. Frota, & J. K. Yoshioka (Eds.), Noticing and second language acquisition: Studies in honor of Richard Schmidt (pp. 169–180). National Foreign Language Center, Hawaii.Google Scholar
(2015) Limited attentional capacity and cognition: Two hypotheses regarding second language performance on tasks. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference (pp. 123–155). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Tasks vs. conditions: Two perspectives on task research and its implications for pedagogy. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24 , 34–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Second language task-based performance: Theory, research, and assessment. Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2022). The psycholinguistics of task-based performance. In M. Long & M. Ahmadian Eds. The Cambridge handbook of task-based learning and teaching pp. 3 26 Cambridge University Press. Crossref
Skehan, P., & Foster, P.
(1997) The influence of planning and post-task activities on accuracy and complexity in task based learning. Language Teaching Research, 1 , 185–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) Task structure and processing conditions in narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49 (1), 93–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Strategic and on-line planning: The influence of surprise information and task time on second language performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language, pp. 193–216. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis in task-based performance: A meta-analysis of the Ealing research. In S. Van Daele, A. Housen, F. Kuiken, M. Pierrard, & Vedder, I. (Eds.), Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language use, learning, and teaching. University of Brussels PressGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P., Foster, P., & Shum, S.
(2016) Ladders and snakes in second language fluency. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 54 (2), 97–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P., & Shum, S.
(2014) Structure and processing condition in video-based narrative retelling. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 197–210). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) What influences performance? Personal style or the task being done? In L. L. C. Wong & K. Hyland (Eds.), Faces of English education: Students, teachers, and pedagogy (pp.28–43). Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, P.
(2004) Oral narrative tasks and second language performance: An investigation of task characteristics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of London.
Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P.
(2008) Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning, 58 (2), 439–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P.
(2005) Planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–276). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z.
(2014) On-line time pressure manipulations: L2 speaking performance under five types of planning and repetition conditions. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 27–62). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z., & Skehan, P.
(2014) Structure, lexis, and time perspective: Influences on task performance. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 155–186). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z., Skehan, P., & Chen, G.
(2019) The effects of hybrid on-line planning and L2 proficiency on video-based speaking task performance. Journal of Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 3 , 53–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Winter, E.
(1976) Fundamentals of information structure. Hatfield Polytechnic.Google Scholar
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R.
(2003) The effects of pre-task and online planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24 , 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar