Part of
Language Acquisition in Romance LanguagesEdited by Vicenç Torrens
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 18] 2024
► pp. 212–229
Edited by Vicenç Torrens
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 18] 2024
► pp. 212–229
Chapter 9Quantifier comprehension in Brazilian Portuguese and the extra-object visual effect
Universal quantifiers are complex for children to comprehend, and over-exhaustive errors can occur even with adults in sentence-picture verification tasks. This paper addresses visual design factors that may explain these difficulties. We examine what we call the “single extra object attraction hypothesis” (SEOH), according to which the visual prominence of a uniquely unpaired extra object compromises attentional resources during these tasks. We manipulated the type of extra-object – single or double – in an eye-tracking experiment with adult speakers of Brazilian Portuguese. Contrary to the SEOH prediction, double objects gave rise to earlier and longer fixations than single objects. There was no difference in accuracy. We discuss the implications of these results for developmental research.
Keywords: universal quantifier, language comprehension, sentence-picture verification task, eye-tracking, extra-object visual effect, Brazilian Portuguese
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Children and adults’ quantifier interpretation
- 3.Eye-tracking and quantifier comprehension
- 4.The eye-tracking experiment
- Hypothesis and predictions
- Method
- Participants
- Material
- Apparatus
- Procedure
- Data treatment and analysis
- Results
- Accuracy
- Eye movement data
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
-
Notes -
References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References
Aravind, A., de Villiers, J., de Villiers, P., Lonigan, C. J., Phillips, B. M., Clancy, J., Landry, S. H., Swank, P. R., Assel, M., Taylor, H. B., Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T., & Valiente, C.
(2017) Children’s quantification with every over time. Glossa, 2(1). 
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C.
(2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1).
Bock, J. K., & Warren, R. K.
(1985) Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation. Cognition, 21(1), 47–67.
Brooks, P. J., & Sekerina, I. A.
(2006) Shallow processing of universal quantification: A comparison of monolingual and bilingual adults. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Vol. 28(No. 28).
Corrêa, L. M., & Augusto, M. R. A.
(2019) Image effects and long distance dependencies. In ExLing 2019: Proceedings of 10th International Conference of Experimental Linguistics (pp. 53–56). International Society of Experimental Linguistics.
Corrêa, L. M., Rodrigues, E. dos S., & Augusto, M. R. A.
Image processing in the tracking of DLD. In ExLing 2022: Proceedings of 13th International Conference of Experimental Linguistics (pp. 41–44). International Society of Experimental Linguistics.
Crain, S., Thornton, R., Boster, C., Conway, L., Lillo-Martin, D., & Woodams, E.
(1996) Quantification without qualification. Language Acquisition, 5(2), 83–153.
Drozd, K. F., & Loosbroek, E. V.
(2006) The effect of context on children’s interpretations of universally quantified sentences. In V. van Geenhoven (Ed.), Semantics in acquisition (pp. 115–140). Springer.
Escobar, L., & Torrens, V.
(2008) The acquisition of universal quantifiers in Spanish. In P. Guijarro-Fuentes, M. P. Larrañaga, & J. Clibbens (Eds.), First language acquisition of morphology and syntax: Perspectives across languages and learners (pp. 119–135). John Benjamins.
Freeman, N., & Stedmon, J.
(1986) How children deal with natural language quantification. In I. Kurcz, G. Shugar, & J. Danks (Eds.), Knowledge and language (pp. 21–48.). North-Holland.
Gavarró, A., & Escobar, M. Á.
(2011) A pilot study of quantification in child Catalan. Zeitschrift Fur Katalanistik, 24(1), 213–225.
Geng, J. J., & Witkowski, P.
(2019) Template-to-distractor distinctiveness regulates visual search efficiency. Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 119–125.
Geurts, B.
(2003) Quantifying kids. Language Acquisition, 11(4), 197–218.
Gouro, T., Norita, H., Nakajima, M., & Ariji, K.
(2001) Children’s interpretation of universal quantifier and pragmatic interference. In Y. Otsu (Ed.), The proceedings of the Fourth Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics (pp. 61–78). Hitsuzi Syobo.
Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, K.
(2000) What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11(4).
Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J.
(1964) The early growth of logic in the child. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Kuznetsova, J., Babyonyshev, M., Reich, J., Hart, L., & Grigorenko, E.
(2007) The acquisition of universal quantifiers in Russian. In A. Belikova, L. Meroni, & M. Umeda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA) (pp. 224–232). Cascadilla Press.
Lopes, R.
(2014) How children distribute: The acquisition of the universal quantifiers in Brazilian Portuguese. Revista da ABRALIN, 13(2), 351–374.
Mazuka, R., Jincho, N., & Oishi, H.
(2009) Development of executive control and language processing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 59–89.
Minai, U., Jincho, N., Yamane, N., & Mazuka, R.
(2012) What hinders child semantic computation: Children’s universal quantification and the development of cognitive control. Journal of Child Language, 39(5), 919–956.
O’Grady, W., Suzuki, T., & Yoshinaga, N.
(2010) Quantifier spreading: New evidence from Japanese. Language Learning and Development, 6(2), 116–125.
Peschel, A. O., & Orquin, J. L.
(2013) A review of the findings and theories on surface size effects on visual attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 902.
Philip, W.
(1995) Event quantification in the acquisition of universal quantification (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Prat-Sala, M., & Branigan, H. P.
(2000) Discourse constraints on syntactic processing in language production: A cross-linguistic study in English and Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(2), 168–182.
Rakhlin, N.
(2007) Children’s interpretation of negative determiners as a window into Q-spreading. In A. Belikova, L. Meroni, & M. Umeda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Conference of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (pp. 363–373). Cascadilla Press.
R Core Team.
(2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved on 23 January 2024 from [URL]
Roeper, T., & E. Matthei
(1974) On the acquisition of some and all. Presented at the Sixth Child Language Research Forum, Stanford University, April 1974.
Roeper, T., Strauss, U., & Pearson, B.
(2004) The acquisition path of quantifiers: Two kinds of spreading (Unpublished manuscript). University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Sekerina, I., & Sauermann, A.
(2017) Quantifier spreading in child eye movements: A case of the Russian quantifier kazhdyj ‘every’. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 2(1), 66.
Sugisaki, K., & Isobe, M.
(2001) Quantification without qualification without plausible dissent. In J.- Y. Kim & A. Werle (Eds.), The Proceedings of SULA 1 (pp. 97–100). GLSA Publications.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, & K. M., Sedivy, J. E.
(1995) Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634.
Yu, X., & Geng, J. J.
(2019) The attentional template is shifted and asymmetrically sharpened by distractor context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(3), 336–353.