Article published in:
Cognitive Control and Consequences of Multilingualism
Edited by John W. Schwieter
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 2] 2016
► pp. 145–171

Chapter 6. Influence of preparation time on language control

A trilingual digit-naming study

| University of Potsdam, Germany
| University of Potsdam, Germany
In this study we investigated how preparation time influences speed of naming single digits in three languages under frequent switch conditions. Twenty native speakers of English (mean age 19.9 years; 3 male) with good proficiency in French and German participated in a trilingual digit naming experiment with short (150ms) or long (1000ms) preparation time (between language cue and stimulus, CSI) and unpredictable switch sequence. Participants responded on average significantly faster on trials with long CSI (562ms) compared to short CSI (657ms). A 2 (Short vs. Long CSI) × 3 (L1, L2, L3) ANOVA showed a significant interaction. The preparation effect was largest for L1 (137ms) and decreased with decreasing proficiency (L2 84ms; L3 65ms). The paper describes preparation time in relation to naming speed, response accuracy, language proficiency and switching costs.
Published online: 03 August 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.2.07fes
References

References

Allport, A., Styles, E., & Hsieh, S.
(1994) Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umilta, & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Concious and nonconcious information processing (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Altmann, E.
(2007) Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: Evidence from backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 892-899. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R.
(2008) Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R., Davidson, D., & Bates, D.
(2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390-412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R., & Milin, P.
(2010) Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 12-28.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(2014) lme4: Linear mixed-effects model using Eigen and s4. R package version 1.1-7. http://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org7package​=lme4Google Scholar
Baus, C., Branzi, F.M., Costa, A.
(2015) On the mechanism and scope of language control in bilingual speech production. In J.W. Schwieter (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of bilingual processing (pp. 508-526). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bobb, S., & Wodniecka, Z.
(2013) Language switching in picture naming. What asymmetric switch costs (do not) tell us about inhibition in bilingual speech planning. Special Issue of Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 568-585. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Calabria, M., Hernández, M., Branzi, F., Costa, A.
(2012) Qualitative differences between bilingual language control and executive control: evidence from task-switching. Frontiers in Psychology. 2, 1-10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cnaan, A., Laird, N., & Slasor, P.
(1997) Using the general linear mixed model to analyse unbalanced repeated measures and longitudinal data. Statistics in Medicine, 16, 2349-2380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., & Santesteban, M.
(2004) Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 491-511. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., Santesteban, M., & Ivanova, I.
(2006) How do highly proficient bilinguals control their lexicalization process? Inhibitory and language-specific selection mechanisms are both functional. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 32, 1057-1074. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Bot, K., & Jaensch, C.
(2015) What is special about L3 processing? Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 18, 130-144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, A., Grainger, J., & Van Heuven, W.
(1999) Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 496-518. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ecke, P.
(2015) Parasitic vocabulary acquisition, cross-linguistic influence, and lexical retrieval in multilinguals. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 18, 145-162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Festman, J.
(2008) Cross-language interference during trilingual picture naming in single and mixed language conditions. In M. Gibson, B. Hufeisen, & C. Personne (Hg.), Mehrsprachigkeit: lernen und lehren, Multilingualism: Learning and Instruction, Le Plurilinguisme: apprendre et enseigner, O Pluilinguismo: aprender e ensinar (pp. 109-119). Selected papers from the L3-Conference in Fribourg, Switzerland.Google Scholar
(2009) Three languages in mind. Saarbrücken: VDM.Google Scholar
Festman, J., & Schwieter, J.W.
(2015) Behavioural measures of language control: Production and comprehension. In J.W. Schwieter (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of bilingual language processing (pp. 527-547). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fink, A., & Goldrick, M.
(2015) Pervasive benefits of preparation in language switching. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 22, 880-814. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Green, D.
(1998) Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 67-81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guo, T., Liu, F., Chen, B., & Li., S.
(2013) Inhibition of non-target languages in multilingual word production: Evidence from Uighur-Chinese-English trilinguals. Acta Psychologica, 143, 277-283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guo, G., & Zhao, H.
(2000) Multi-level modeling for binary data. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 441-462. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jost, K., De Baene, W., Koch, I., & Brass, M.
(2013) A review of the role of cue processing in task switching. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 221, 5-14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiesel, A., Steinhauer, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A., & Koch, I.
(2010) Control and interference in task switching: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849-874. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linck, J., Schwieter, J.W., & Sunderman, G.
(2012) Inhibitory control predicts language switching performance in trilingual speech production. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 651-662. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Logan, G., & Bundesen, C.
(2003) Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 575-599. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R.
(2003) Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 362-372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meiran, N.
(1996) Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423-1442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research, 63, 234-249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meuter, R., & Allport, A.
(1999) Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 25-40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Monsell, S.
(2003) Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134-140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Monsell, S., Yeung, N., & Azuma, R.
(2000) Reconfiguration of task-set: Is it easier to switch to the weaker task? Psychological Research, 63, 250-264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mosca M., & Clahsen H.
(2016) Examining language switching in bilinguals: The role of task-demand. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 415-424. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M.
(2004) A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Philipp, A., Gade, M., & Koch, I.
(2007) Inhibitory processes in language switching: Evidence from switching language-defined response sets. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 395-416. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Philipp, A., & Koch, I.
(2009) Inhibition in language switching: What is inhibited when switching between languages in naming tasks? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1187-1195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team
(2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. http://​www​.R​-project​.org
Rogers, R., & Monsell, S.
(1995) Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rubinstein, J., Meyer, D., & Evans, J.
(2001) Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763-797. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, M., & Jarvis, S.
(2014) Lexical access and lexical diversity in first language attrition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17, 729-748. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Venables, W., & Ripley B.
(2002) Modern Applied Statistics with S. Springer, New York, fourth edition. http://​www​.stats​.ox​.ac​.uk​/pub​/MASS4 DOI: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verhoef, K., Roelofs, A., & Chwilla, D.
(2009) Role of inhibition in language switching: Evidence from event-related brain potentials in overt picture naming. Cognition, 110, 84-99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weissberger G., Wierenga C., Bondi M., Gollan T.
(2012) Partially over-lapping mechanisms of language and task control in young and older bilinguals. Psychology and Aging, 27, 959-974. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Czapka, Sophia, Christiane Wotschack, Annegret Klassert & Julia Festman
2020. A path to the bilingual advantage: Pairwise matching of individuals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23:2 ► pp. 344 ff. Crossref logo
Festman, Julia
2020. Learning and Processing Multiple Languages: The More the Easier?. Language Learning Crossref logo
Mosca, Michela
2019. Trilinguals’ language switching: A strategic and flexible account. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 72:4 ► pp. 693 ff. Crossref logo
Santesteban, Mikel & John W. Schwieter
2020.  In Bilingual Lexical Ambiguity Resolution, ► pp. 126 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.