Article published in:
Cognitive Individual Differences in Second Language Processing and AcquisitionEdited by Gisela Granena, Daniel O. Jackson and Yucel Yilmaz
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 3] 2016
► pp. 89–104
Methodological implications of working memory tasks for L2 processing research
A growing body of research within cognitive perspectives of second language acquisition (SLA) has investigated how individual differences in working memory (WM) capacity may impact second language (L2) processes. Many of these studies have employed versions of complex span measures, such as the reading span test (RSPAN). The findings of these studies are mixed, and no standard scoring methods exist for these tasks. Therefore, this study examines the consequences of different scoring methods and data analysis procedures of two common complex span tasks (reading span and operation span) used in L2 sentence processing research. L2 Spanish learners completed two WM span tasks and an online Spanish sentence interpretation task. The results indicate that various scoring methods of the complex span tasks were significantly correlated within tasks. However, in examining the relationship between WM and sentence interpretation, we found that different results emerged, depending on WM task type, scoring method and type of analysis. Implications for research investigating WM resources in SLA are discussed.
Article outline
- 1.Methodological issues of working memory tasks for L2 processing research
- 2.Background
- 2.1Working memory and second language input processing
- 2.2Working memory and span tasks
-
3.Method
- 3.1Participants
- 3.2Materials
- 3.3Procedure
- 4.Results
- 5.Discussion and conclusion
-
References
Published online: 23 December 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.3.05lee
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.3.05lee
References
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J.
Baddeley, A. D.
Chun, D. M., & Payne, J. S.
Conway, A. R., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P.
Ellis, N. C.
Fernández, C.
Friedman, N.P., & Miyake, A.
Gass, S.M.
Harrington, M., & Sawyer, M.
Irwin, J. R., & McClelland, G. H.
Juffs, A.
Kroll, J., Michael, E., Tokowicz, N., & Dufour, R.
Leeser, M. J.
Long, M.
MacCallum, R.C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K.J., & Rucker, D.D.
MacDonald, M.C., & Christiansen, M.H.
Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T.
Miyake, A.
Miyake, A., & Shah, P.
O’Grady, W.
Osaka, M., & Osaka, N.
Osaka, M., Osaka, N., & Groner, R.
Pienemann, M.
Sunderman, G., & Kroll, J.F.
Tokowicz, N., Michael, E.B., & Kroll, J.F.
Turner, M., & Engle, R.W.
VanPatten, B.
VanPatten, B., & Williams, J.
Waters, G.S., & Caplan, D.
Cited by
Cited by 5 other publications
Edmonds, Amanda & Aarnes Gudmestad
Edmonds, Amanda & Pascale Leclercq
Gudmestad, Aarnes & Amanda Edmonds
In’nami, Yo, Yuko Hijikata & Rie Koizumi
Jo, Kyuhee, Kitaek Kim & Hyunwoo Kim
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.