Article published in:
Cognitive Individual Differences in Second Language Processing and Acquisition
Edited by Gisela Granena, Daniel O. Jackson and Yucel Yilmaz
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 3] 2016
► pp. 205222
References

References

Baddeley, A.
(2003) Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biria, R., Ameri-Golestan, A., and Antón-Méndez, I.
(2010) Syntactic priming effects between modalities: A study of indirect questions/requests among Persian English learners. English Language Teaching, 3, 111–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bock, K.
(1986) Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1989) Closed-class immanence in sentence production. Cognition, 31, 163–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bock, K., Dell, G. S., Chang, F., & Onishi, K.
(2007) Structural persistence from language comprehension to language production. Cognition, 104, 437–458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bock, K., & Griffin, Z.
(2000) The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 177–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bock, K., & Loebell, H.
(1990) Framing sentences. Cognition, 35, 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bock, K., Loebell, H., & Morey, R.
(1992) From conceptual roles to structural relations: Bringing the syntactic cleft. Psychological Review, 99, 150–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Branigan, H., Pickering, M., & Cleland, A.
(1999) Syntactic priming in written production: Evidence for rapid decay. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 635–640. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75, B13–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Broadway, J. M., & Engle, R. W.
(2010) Validating running memory span: Measurement of working memory capacity and links with fluid intelligence. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 563–570. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, F.
(2008) Implicit learning as a mechanism of language change. Theoretical Linguistics, 34, 115–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K.
(2006) Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113, 234–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, F., Dell, G., Bock, K., & Griffin, Z.
(2000) Structural priming as implicit learning: A comparison of models of sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 217–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, F., Janciauskas, M., & Fitz, H.
(2012) Language adaptation and learning: Getting explicit about implicit learning. Language and Linguistics Compass 6/5, 259–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, M. J.
(1997) Children’s memory scales. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Conroy, M. & Antón-Méndez, I.
(2015) A preposition is something you can end a sentence with: Learning English stranded prepositions through structural priming. Second Language Research, 31, 211–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conway, C. M., Bauernschmidt, A., Huang, S. S., & Pisoni, D. B.
(2010) Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key. Cognition, 114, 356–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, J., Kerr, B., & Streissguth, A. P.
(1995) Correlational analyses of procedural and declarative learning performance. Intelligence, 20, 87–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, V. S., & Bock, K.
(2006) The functions of structural priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 1011–1029. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, V. S., Bock, K., Wilson, M. P., & Cohen, N. J.
(2008) Memory for syntax despite amnesia. Psychological Science, 19, 940–946. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, R.
(2002) Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science, 13, 431–436. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., Bernolet, S., Schoonbaert, S., Speybroeck, S., & Vanderelst, D.
(2008) Syntactic priming persists while the lexical boost decays: Evidence from written and spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 214–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaschak, M. P., Kutta, T. J., & Coyle, J. M.
(2014) Long and short term cumulative structural priming effects. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 728–743. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaschak, M. P., Kutta, T. J., & Jones, J. L.
(2011) Structural priming as implicit learning: Cumulative priming effects and individual differences. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 1133–1139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaschak, M. P., Kutta, T. J., & Schatschneider, C.
(2011) Long-term cumulative structural priming persists for (at least) one week. Memory & Cognition, 39, 381–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., Jimenez, L., Brown, J., & Mackintosh, N.
(2010) Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116, 321–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, E.
(2012a) Implicit statistical learning is directly associated with the acquisition of syntax. Developmental Psychology, 48, 171–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012b) Individual differences in syntactic priming in language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 393–418. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kutta, T., & Kashak, M.
(2012) Changes in task-extrinsic context do not affect the persistence of long-term cumulative structural priming. Acta Psychologica, 141, 408–414. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, E., Altmann, G., & St Claire, M.
(2013) Priming of verb inflections in L1 and L2 French: A comparison of ‘redundant’ versus ‘non-redundant’ training conditions. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 51, 271–298.Google Scholar
McDonough, K.
(2006) Interaction and syntactic priming: English L2 speakers’ production of dative constructions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 179–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Eliciting wh-questions through collaborative syntactic priming activities during peer interaction. In P. Trofimovich, & K. McDonough (Eds.), Applying priming methods to L2 learning, teaching, and research: Insights from psycholinguistics (pp. 131–151). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Using structural priming tasks in an EAP context. Contact, 40(2), 51–67.Google Scholar
McDonough, K., & De Vleeschauwer, J.
(2012) Prompt type frequency, auditory pattern discrimination, and EFL learners’ production of wh-questions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 355–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., Kielstra, P., Crowther, D., & Smith, G.
(2016) Structural priming in L2 speech production: Examining relationships among English L2 speakers’ production, cognitive abilities, and awareness. In A. Mackey & E. Marsden (Eds.), Advancing methodology and practice: The IRIS repository of instruments for research into second languages (pp. 112–131). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McDonough, K., & Kim, Y.
(2009) Syntactic priming, type frequency, and EFL learners’ production of wh-questions. Modern Language Journal, 93, 386–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P.
(1998) The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 633–651. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M., & Ferreira, V.
(2008) Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 427–459. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F.
(2014) How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Psychological Corporation
(1997) WAIS-III – WMS-III technical manual. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Raven, J.
(2004) Coloured Progressive Matrices and Chrichton Vocabulary Scale. London: Pearson Assessment.Google Scholar
Reber, A. S.
(1993) Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reitter, D., Keller, F., & Moore, J. D.
(2011) A computational cognitive model of syntactic priming. Cognitive Science, 35, 587–637. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, C., Chang, F., Ambridge, B., Pine, J., & Lieven, E.
(2012) The development of abstract syntax: Evidence from structural priming and the lexical boost. Cognition, 125, 49–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shin, J. A., & Christianson, K.
(2012) Structural priming and second language learning. Language Learning, 62, 931–964. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E.
(2009) Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory? In J. S. B. T. Evans, & K. Frankish (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 55–88). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W.
(2005) Individual differences in working memory capacity and learning: Evidence from the serial reaction time task. Memory & Cognition, 33, 213–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wheeldon, L., & Smith, M.
(2003) Phrase structure priming: A short-lived effect. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 431–442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Jackson, Carrie N.
2018. Second language structural priming: A critical review and directions for future research. Second Language Research 34:4  pp. 539 ff. Crossref logo
Kim, YouJin, Stephen Skalicky & YeonJoo Jung
2020. The Role of Linguistic Alignment on Question Development in Face‐to‐Face and Synchronous Computer‐Mediated Communication Contexts: A Conceptual Replication Study. Language Learning 70:3  pp. 643 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.