Article published in:Cognitive Individual Differences in Second Language Processing and Acquisition
Edited by Gisela Granena, Daniel O. Jackson and Yucel Yilmaz
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 3] 2016
► pp. 223–248
Interrelationships among L2 linguistic knowledge, working memory functions, and L2 reading
The main purpose of the current study is to investigate whether L2 reading comprehension is related to the processing and storage functions of working memory (WM) as well as explicit and implicit sources of knowledge in the L2. Byproducts of this question involve (a) whether the relationship between WM and reading comprehension is attributable to the linguistic nature of the complex span task; (b) whether WM is related to explicit and implicit types of linguistic knowledge in the L2. Participants were 84 late adult learners of English with a B2 level of proficiency. WM capacity was measured through reading span tasks (RST) administered in L1 and L2 and an operation span task (OST). An untimed grammaticality judgment test (GJT) and a metalinguistic knowledge test (MKT) were administered to measure explicit linguistic knowledge in the L2 while a timed GJT and an elicited oral imitation test (EOI) were used to measure implicit linguistic knowledge. Reading comprehension scores were obtained from a retired paper-based TOEFL. A principal component analysis (PCA) on the independent variables revealed a three-component model where processing and storage scores obtained from span tasks loaded on separate components reflecting a distinction between processing and storage functions of WM whereas explicit and implicit L2 knowledge measures loaded together on a single component. A regression analysis performed with factor scores from the PCA as independent variables and L2 reading comprehension scores as the dependent variable revealed significant contributions of WM’s processing function and L2 linguistic knowledge to reading comprehension in the L2. This suggests that the variance shared by WM capacity and L2 reading comprehension is not due to the linguistic nature of the span task but to the general processing efficiency of verbal WM capacity.
- 2.Implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge in L2 learning
- 3.Working memory in L2 learning
- 4.WM, L2 implicit/explicit knowledge and L2 reading
- 5.Research questions and hypotheses
- 6.2.1Working memory measures
- 6.2.2Tests of L2 implicit knowledge
- 6.2.3Tests of L2 explicit knowledge
- 6.2.4L2 reading comprehension test
- 6.2.1Working memory measures
- 6.4Data Analysis
- 9.Concluding remarks
Published online: 23 December 2016
Adams, A.-M., & Guillot, K.
Alptekin, C., & Erçetin, G.
Alptekin, C., Erçetin, G., & Özemir, O.
Baddeley, A. D.
Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A.
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P.A.
Dehn, M. J.
DeKeyser, R., & Juffs, A.
Ellis, N. C.
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Reinders, H.
Engle, R. W., Cantor, J., & Carullo, J. J.
Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., & Tuholski, S. W.
(1999) Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102–134). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Erçetin, G., & Alptekin, C.
Geva, E., & Ryan, E. B.
Han, Y., & Ellis, R.
Han, Z. H., & Finneran, R.
Harrington, M., & Sawyer, M.
Hassin, R. R., Bargh, J. A., Engell, A. D., & McCulloch, K. C.
Hulstijn, J. H.
Juffs, A., & DeKeyser, R.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A.
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W.
Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C., & Morgan, G. A.
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P.
Norris, J., & Ortega, L.
Osaka, M., & Osaka, N.
Osaka, M., Osaka, N., & Groner, R.
Payne, T. W., Kalibatseva, Z., & Jungers, M. K.
Roehr, K., & Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A.
Shah, P., & Miyake, A.
Sawyer, M., & Ranta, L.
Service, E., Simola, M., Metsaenheimo, O., & Maury, S.
Shiu, L. J., & Spada, N.
(2012) An empirical validation of elicited imitation as a measure of L2 implicit knowledge. Paper presented at the International Association of Applied Linguistics (AILA) Congress, Beijing, CN, August.
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S.
Towse, J. N., & Hitch, G. J.
Towse, J. N., Hitch, G. J., & Hutton, U.
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W.
Ullman, M. T.
Van den Noort, M., Bosch, P., & Hugdahl, K.
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 may 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.