Cover not available
Part of
L3 Syntactic Transfer: Models, new developments and implications
Edited by Tanja Angelovska and Angela Hahn
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 5] 2017
► pp. 35–61

Chapter 2
Toward a new understanding of syntactic CLI

Evidence from L2 and L3 acquisition

With the aim to attain a principled understanding of adult L2/L3 acquisition, we present data from a large corpus that focuses on L2/L3 identification of nominal gaps of empty categories. We show that both surface and abstract properties of the target language play significant roles in development. The analyses of amount correct and nature of errors indicate that the initial state in both L2/L3 studies emerge in terms of the learners’ identification of a nominal gap within the given expression but not necessarily in an L1 manner. Based on the finding that CLI is syntactically selective and principled, multilingual development is to be understood as a specific reconstruction and integration of surface and abstract features of the target language.
Keywords: initial state, crosslinguistic influence, multilingual development, surface and abstract features, empty categories, pronoun and null anaphora
Article outline
  • Fundamental questions
  • What we already know
  • Main models for L2 and their consequence for L3 acquisition
  • Toward a new understanding of syntactic CLI
  • Focus of this paper
  • Two studies in EC identification in English
    • First study: EC identification in restricted relative clauses
    • Second study: EC identification in adverbial subordinate clauses
    • The role of surface elements
    • The role of abstract features
    • Concluding remarks
  • Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 15 August 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.5.03fly
References (77)
References
Aronin, L., & Singleton, D. (2012). Multilingualism (Impact: Studies in Language and Society 30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, P., & Wei, L. (2007). Introduction: Multilingualism as a problem? Monolingualism as a problem? In P. Auer & L. Wei (Eds.), Handbook of multilingualism and multilingual Communication (pp. 1–14). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berkes, É., & Flynn, S. (2015). Multilingual acquisition of English: Development of grammar through study of null anaphora. In M. p. S. Jordà & L. P. Falomir (Eds.), Learning and using multiple languages: Current findings from research on multilingualism (pp. 112–133). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
(2016). Multi-competence and Syntax. In V. Cook & L. Wei (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic multi-competence (pp. 206–226). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, T. K., & Ritchie, W. C. (Eds.). (2013). The handbook of bilingualism and multilingualism (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Biberauer, T., Holmberg, A., Roberts, I., & Sheehan, M. (Eds.). (2010). Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (1989). What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In S. M. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 41–68). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, H., & Wexler, K. (1987). The maturation of syntax. In T. Roeper & E. Williams (Eds.), Parameter setting (pp. 123–172). Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boser, K., Lust, B., Santelmann, L., & Whitman, J. (1992). The syntax of CP and V-2 in early German child grammar: The Strong Continuity Hypothesis Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Association (Vol. 22; pp. 51–66). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Boser, K., Santelmann, L. M., Barbier, I., & Lust, B. (1995). Grammatical mapping from UG to language specific grammars: Deriving variation in the acquisition of Germa. In D. MacLaughlin & S. McEwen (Eds.), BUCLD 19: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 130–142). Boston, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Cabrelli Amaro, J., Flynn, S., & Rothman, J. (Eds.). (2012). Third language acquisition in adulthood (Studies in Bilingualism 46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carnie, A. (2013). Syntax: A generative introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
(2006). The architecture of language. New Delhi: OUP.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Muysken, P. (1986). The availability of universal grammar to adult and child learners: A study of the acquisition of German word order. Second Language Research, 2(2), 93–119. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Cook, V. (2010). The relationship between first and second language learning revisited. In E. Macaro (Ed.), The Continuum companion to second language acquisition (pp. 137–157). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cook, V., & Newson, M. (2007). Chomsky’s Universal Grammar: An introduction (3rd ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Devlin, K. (2015, July 13). Learning a foreign language a ‘must’ in Europe, not so in America. Reprinted from: < [URL]> (7 June, 2016)).
Epstein, S. D., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G. (1996). Second language acquisition: Theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19(4), 677–758. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Eubank, L. (Ed.). (1991). Point counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language (Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 3). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fallah, N., Jabbari, A. A., & Fazilatfar, A. M. (2016). Source(s) of syntactic cross-linguistic influence (CLI): The case of L3 acquisition of English possessives by Mazandarani – Persian bilinguals. Second Language Research, 32(2), 225–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Felix, S. W. (1984). Two problems of language acquisition: On the interaction of Universal Grammar and language growth. Passau: Universität Passau.Google Scholar
Flynn, S. (1983). A study of the effects of principal branching direction in second language acquisition: The generalization of a parameter of Universal Grammar from first to second language acquisition. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
(1987a). A parameter-setting model of L2 acquisition: Experimental studies in anaphora. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1987b). Second language acquisition of pronoun anaphora: Resetting the parameter. In B. Lust (Ed.), Studies in the anaphora (Vol. II; pp. 227–243). Dordrecht: D. Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989). Spanish, Japanese and Chinese speakers’ acquisition of English relative clauses: New evidence for the head-direction parameter. In K. Hyltenstam & L. K. Obler (Eds.), Bilingualism across the lifespan: Aspects of acquisition, maturity, and loss (pp. 116–131). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). UG and L3 acquisition: New insights and more questions. In Y. I. Leung (Ed.), Third language acquisition and Universal Grammar (pp. 71–88). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Flynn, S., & Espinal, I. (1985). Head-initial/head-final parameter in adult Chinese L2 acquisition of English. Second Language Research, 1(2), 93–117. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Flynn, S., Foley, C., Gair, J., & Lust, B. (2005). Developmental primacy of free relatives in first, second and third language acquisition: Implications for their syntax and semantics. Paper presented at the Linguistic Association of Great Britain, Cambridge University.
Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I. (2004). The Cumulative-Enhancement Model for language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and childrens’ patterns of development. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1(1), 3–17. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Flynn, S., & Lust, B. (2002). A minimalist approach to L2 solves a dilemma of UG. In V. Cook (Ed.), Portraits of the L2 user (pp. 95–120). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Flynn, S., Martohardjono, G., & O’Neil, W. (Eds.). (1998). The generative study of second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Flynn, S., & O’Neil, W. (Eds.). (1988). Linguistic theory in second language acquisition. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gair, J., Flynn, S., & Brown, O. (1997). Why Japanese object to L2 objects. In S. Somashekar, K. Yamakoshi, M. Blume & C. Foley (Eds.), Cornell University Working Papers in Linguistics 15 (pp. 101–111). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (Eds.). (1983). Language transfer in language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(Eds.). (1992). Language transfer in language learning (Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 5) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2004). Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. In T. K. Bhatia & W. C. Ritchie (Eds.), The handbook of bilingualism (pp. 32–63). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Guasti, M. T. (2002). Language acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Tecumseh, F. W. (2002). The Faculty of Language: What is it, who has it and how did it evolve? Science, 298(5598), 1569–1579. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Chan, C. Y. (1997). The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The ‘Failed Functional Features Hypothesis’. Second Language Research, 13(3), 187–226. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Holmberg, A. (2010). Null subject parameters. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts & M. Sheehan (Eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory (pp. 88–124). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Holmberg, A., & Sheehan, M. (2010). Control into finite clauses in partial null-subject languages. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts & M. Sheehan (Eds.), Parametric variation (pp. 125–152). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert. (2003). On control. In R. Hendrick (Ed.), Minimalist syntax (pp. 6–81). Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaeggli, O., & Safir, K. J. (1989). The null subject parameter. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, S. H., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jessner, U. (2006). Linguistic awareness in multilinguals: English as a third language. Edinburgh: EUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. S. (1988). Critical period effects on universal properties of language: The status of Subjacency in the acquisition of a second language. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 60–99. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Key data on teaching languages at school in Europe (3rd ed.) (2012). [ebook] Eurydice/Eurostat. Reprinted from: <[URL]> (7 June, 2016).
Language policy. EU fact sheets, European Parliament. (n.d.). Reprinted from: <[URL]> (30 May, 2016).
Liceras, J. M., Zobl, H., & Goodluck, H. (Eds.). (2008). The role of formal features in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Livitz, I. (2011). Incorporating PRO: A defective-goal analysis. In N. Myler & J. Wood (Eds.), NYU Working Papers in Linguistics (NYUWPL) (Vol. 3, pp. 95–119).Google Scholar
Lust, B. (Ed.). (1986). Studies in the acquisition of anaphora: Defining the constraints. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999). Universal Grammar: The Strong Continuity Hypothesis in first language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of child language acquisition (pp. 111–155). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(2006). Child language: Acquisition and growth. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacSwan, J. (2005). Codeswitching and generative grammar: A critique of the MLF model and some remarks on “modified minimalism”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 8(1), 1–22. DOI logo.Google Scholar
(2013). Code-switching and grammatical theory. In T. K. Bhatia & W. C. Ritchie (Eds.), The handbook of bilingualism and multilingualism (pp. 323–350). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Martohardjono, G. (1993). Wh-movement in the acquisition of a second language. Cross-linguistic studies of three languages with and without syntactic movement. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Martohardjono, G. & Flynn, S. (1995). Language transfer. In L. Eubank, L. Selinker & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), The current state of interlanguage (pp. 205–18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., de la Fuente, I., Davidson, J., & Foote, R. (2013). The role of experience in the acquisition and production of diminutives and gender in Spanish: Evidence from L2 learners and heritage speakers. Second Language Research, 29(1), 87–118. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Murphy, S. (2003). Second language transfer during third language acquisition. Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL and Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 1–21. Reprinted from: <[URL]> (17 November, 2011).
Paradis, J., Nicoladis, E., & Genesee, F. (2000). Early emergence of structural constraints on code-mixing: Evidence from French-English bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(3), 245–261. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Radford, A. (2004). Minimalist syntax: Exploring the structure of English. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rieber, R. W. (1983). The psychology of language and thought; Noam Chomsky interviewed by Robert W. Rieber. In Dialogues on the psychology of language and thought. New York, NY: Plenum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, W. C., & Bhatia, T. K. (Eds.). (1996). Handbook of second language acquisition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(Eds.). (2009). The new handbook of second language acquisition. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (2004). On the study of the language faculty: Results, developments and perspectives. Linguistic Review, 21(3–4), 323–344. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Roberts, I. (2010). Agreement and head movement. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, I., & Holmberg, A. (2010). Introduction: Parameters in minimalist theory. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts & M. Sheehan (Eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory (pp. 1–57). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Rothman, J., & Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2010). What variables condition syntactic transfer? A look at the L3 initial state. Second Language Research, 26(2), 189–218. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research, 12(1), 40–77. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2016). The scalpel model of third language acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, M., Mitrofanova, N., Mykhaylyk, R., & Rodina, Y. (2016). Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The linguistic proximity model. International Journal of Bilingualism. DOI logo.Google Scholar
White, L. (1989). Universal Grammar and second language acquisition (Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 1). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998). UG access in L2 acquisition: Reassessing the question NFLRC Netwok #9 (Vol.HTML document). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center. Reprinted from: < [URL]> (18 November, 2011).
(2003). Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitman, J., Lee, K., & Lust, B. (1991). Continuity of the principles of Universal Grammar in first language acquisition: The issue of functional categories. In NELS Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 21; pp. 383–397). Amherst MA: University of Quebec at Montreal, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Umejima, Keita, Suzanne Flynn & Kuniyoshi L. Sakai
2024. Enhanced activations in the dorsal inferior frontal gyrus specifying the who, when, and what for successful building of sentence structures in a new language. Scientific Reports 14:1 DOI logo
Flynn, Suzanne
2021. Microvariation in multilingual situations: The importance of property-by-property acquisition: Pros and cons. Second Language Research 37:3 ► pp. 481 ff. DOI logo
Jo, Kyuhee, Kitaek Kim & Hyunwoo Kim
2021. Children's interpretation of negation and quantifier scope in L3 English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 24:3 ► pp. 427 ff. DOI logo
Fernández-Berkes, Éva & Suzanne Flynn
2020. Where DLC Meets Multilingual Syntactic Development. In Dominant Language Constellations [Educational Linguistics, 47], ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Fernández-Berkes, Éva & Suzanne Flynn
2021. Vindicating the need for a principled theory of language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 11:1 ► pp. 30 ff. DOI logo
Fernández-Berkes, Éva & Suzanne Flynn
2023. Grammatical mapping in L3 acquisition. In L3 Development After the Initial State [Studies in Bilingualism, 65], ► pp. 8 ff. DOI logo
Park, Mihi & Rebecca Lurie Starr
2020. The acquisition of L3 variation among early bilinguals. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 10:5 ► pp. 657 ff. DOI logo
Angelovska, Tanja & Angela Hahn
2017. L3 syntactic transfer – an integrative approach. In L3 syntactic transfer [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 5], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.