In this chapter, we argue that another factor should be brought into the general picture of third and additional language acquisition: the comprehensible linguistic input. Predictions of current models have been predominantly based on the cognitive-psychological prominence of the three languages (native or not, adult-onset or not, naturalistic or instructed, proficient or not) as well as on the structural linguistic properties to be acquired, which may overlap or contrast. We argue that even keeping these two factors constant, discrepancies in learning outcomes still arise, which have to be explained by the linguistic experience of the learners. We support our arguments with results from two recently published studies, which document diverging developmental paths for two properties that should have been acquired in a similar manner.
(1999) Topic. In P. Bosch & R. van der Sand (Eds.), Focus: Linguistic, cognitive and computational perspectives (pp. 142–165). Cambridge: CUP.
(1986) Indefinite object drop. Linguistic Inquiry, 17(2), 354–359.
(1972) Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation. In Studies on semantics in generative grammar (pp. 69–119). The Hague: Mouton.
Clements, J. C.
(1994) Notes on topicalization and object drop in Spanish. In M. Mazzola (Ed.), Issues and theory in Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the XXIII symposium on Romance languages (pp. 219–237). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press
(1990) Types of A-bar dependencies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
(2008) Silent arguments without pro. In T. Biberauer (Ed.) The limits of syntactic variation (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 132) (p. 311–329). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Epstein, S. D., Flynn, S. & Martohardjono, G.
(1996) Second language acquisition: Theoretical and experimental is-sues in contemporary research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 677–758.
(1996) Negation in early German-English interlanguage: More valueless features in the L2 initial state. Second Language Research, 12, 73–106.
Falk, Y., & Bardel, C.
(2011) Object pronouns in German L3 syntax: Evidence for the L2 status factor. Second Language Research, 27, 59–82.
Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I.
(2004) The cumulative enhancement model for language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1, 3–17.
(2009) Null objects in L1 Thai-L2 English-L3 Chinese: An empiricist take on a theoretical problem. In Y. I. Leung (Ed.), Third language acquisition and Universal Grammar (pp. 162–191). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Prince, E. F.
(1984) Topicalization and left-dislocation: A functional analysis. In S. White & V. Teller (Eds.), Discourses in reading and linguistics (pp. 213–225). New York, NY: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
(1981) Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica, 27(1), 53–93.
(2010) On the typological economy of syntactic transfer: Word order and relative clause attachment preference in L3 Brazilian Portuguese. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 48(2–3), 245–273. .
(2011) L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The Typological Primacy Model. Second Language Research, 27(1), 107–127. .
(2015) Linguistic and cognitive motivation for the Typological Primacy Model of third language (L3) transfer: Considering the role of timing of acquisition and proficiency in the previous languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 179–190. .
Rothman, J., Cabrelli Amaro, J., & de Bot, K.
(2013) Third language (L3) acquisition. In J. Herschensohn & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 372–393). Cambridge: CUP.
Schwartz, B. D., & R. Sprouse
(1996) L2 Cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access Hypothesis. Second Language Research, 12(1), 40–72. .
(2015) The effect of construction frequency and native transfer on L2 knowledge of the syntax-discourse interface. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(3), 671–699. .
(2016) The scalpel model of third language acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism. .
Slabakova, R., & García Mayo, M. P.
(2015) The L3 syntax-discourse interface. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 208–226. .
Vainikka, A., & M. Young-Scholten
(1996) Gradual development of L2 phrase structure. Second Language Research, 12(1), 7–39. .
(1992) The informational component. New York, NY: Garland.
(1988) The semantics and pragmatics of preposing. New York, NY: Garland.
Ward, G., & Birner, B. J.
(2005) Information structure and non-canonical syntax. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 153–174). Oxford: Blackwell.
Westergaard, M., Mitrofanova, N., Mykhaylyk, R., & Rodina, Y.
(2016) Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The Linguistic Proximity Model. International Journal of Bilingualism, 1367006916648859. .
2023. Feature reassembly and L1 preemption: Acquiring CLLD in L2 Italian and L2 Romanian. Second Language Research► pp. 026765832311563 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.