References
Baddeley, A.
(2000) The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4(11), 417–423. DOI logo.Google Scholar
(2003) Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36(3), 189–208. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G.
(1974) Working memory. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 47–89). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bardel, C.
in progress). Function words and other words in third language production. Ms.
Bardel, C., & Falk, Y.
(2007) The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research, 23(4), 459–484. DOI logo.Google Scholar
(2012) The L2 status factor and the declarative/procedural distinction. In J. Cabrelli Amaro, S. Flynn & J. Rothman (Eds.), Third language acquisition in adulthood (Studies in Bilingualism 46) (pp. 61–78). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E.
(1994a) Representation and ways of knowing: Three issues in second language acquisition. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit factors in second language learning: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 549–569). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1994b) Analysis and control in the development of second language proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(2), 157–168. DOI logo.Google Scholar
(2001) Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., & Ryan, E. B.
(1985) Toward a definition of metalinguistic skill. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 31, 229–251.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D.
(1989) Metalinguistic performance and interlinguistic competence. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohnacker, U.
(2005) Nonnative acquisition of verb second: On the empirical underpinnings of universal L2 claims. In M. den Dikken & C. M. Tortora (Eds.), The function of function words and functional categories (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 78) (pp. 41–77). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) When Swedes begin to learn German: From V2 to V2. Second Language Research, 22(4), 443–86. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Conway, A., Tuholski, S., Shisler, R., & Engle, R.
(1999) The effect of memory load on negative priming: An individual differences investigation. Memory and Cognition, 27(6), 1042–1050. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Costa, A., & Santesteban, M.
(2004) Lexical access in bilingual production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 491–511. DOI logo.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M.
(2003) Implicit and explicit learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313 –348). Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, J. M.
(2001) Activation or inhibition? The interaction of L1, L2, and L3 on the language mode continuum. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 69–89). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z.
(2009) The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ecke, P., & Hall., C. J.
(2000) Lexikalischer Fehler in Deutsch als Drittsprache: Translexikalischer Einfluss auf 3 Ebenen der mentalen Repräsentation. Deutsch als Fremdsprache, (37)1, 30–36.Google Scholar
Ellis, N.
(2001) Memory for language. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 33–68). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2006) Modelling learning difficulty and second language proficiency: The differential contributions of implicit and explicit knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 431–463. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Engle, R.
(2002) Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 19–23. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Falk, Y., & Bardel, C.
(2010) The study of the role of the background languages in third language acquisition: The state of the art. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48(2–3), 185–220. DOI logo.Google Scholar
(2011) Object pronouns in German L3 syntax: Evidence for the L2 status factor. Second Language Research, 27(1), 59–82. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Falk, Y., Lindqvist, C., & Bardel, C.
(2015) The role of L1 explicit metalinguistic knowledge in L3 oral production at the initial state. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 227–235. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Fehringer, C., & Fry, C.
(2007) Hesitation phenomena in the language production of bilingual speakers. Folia Linguistica, 41(1–2), 37–72.Google Scholar
Gass, S.
(1988) Integrating research areas: A framework for second language studies. Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 198–217. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Green, D.
(1998) Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 67–81. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Hammarberg, B.
(2009) Processes in third language acquisition. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
(2010) The languages of the multilingual: Some conceptual and terminological issues. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48(2–3), 91–104. DOI logo.Google Scholar
(2016) Flerspråkighet och tredjespråksinlärning. Några grundbegrepp [Multilingualism and third language learning. Some fundamental concepts]. In C. Bardel, Y. Falk, & C. Lindqvist, Tredjespråksinlärning [Third language learning] (pp. 33–58). Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Kane, M., & Engle, R.
(2003) Working memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(1), 47–70. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Kellerman, E.
(1983) Now you see it, now you don’t. In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 112–134). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Kormos, J.
(2013) New conceptualization of language aptitude in second language attainment. In G. Granena & M. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (Language Learning & Language Acquisition 35) (pp. 131–152). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J., Bobb, S., & Wodniecka, Z.
(2006) Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 9(2), 119–135. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Kroll, J., Boo, S., Misra, M., & Guo, T.
(2008) Language selection in bilingual speech: Evidence for inhibitory processes. Acta psychological, 128(3), 416–430. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Leung, Y.-k. I.
(2002) L2 vs. L3 initial state: Evidence from the acquisition of French DPs by Vietnamese monolinguals and Cantonese – English bilinguals. In M. Hooghiemstra (Ed.), Proceedings of the second international conference on third language acquisition and trilingualism. Interactive CD-rom: L3 conference. Ljowert & Leeuwarden: Fryske Akademy.Google Scholar
Miyake, A., Friedman, N., & Emerson, M.
(2000) The unity and diversity of functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Gilabert, R., & Muñoz, C.
(2010) Differences in attainment and performance in a foreign language: The role of working memory capacity. International Journal of English Studies, 10(1), 19–42. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Odlin, T.
(1989) Language Transfer. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M.
(2004) A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism (Studies in Bilingualism 18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Language and communication disorders in multilinguals. In B. Stemmer & H. A. Whitaker (Eds.), Handbook of the neuroscience of language (pp. 341–349). Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, J., & Whitney, P.
(2002) Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal, 20(1), 7–32.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M.
(2015) When L1 becomes an L3: Do heritage speakers make better L3 learners? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 163–178. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Roberts, R., Hager, L., & Heron, C.
(1994) Prefrontal cognitive processes: working memory and inhibition in the antisaccade task. Journal of Experimenal Psychology: General, 123(4), 374–393. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Robinson, P.
(2003) Attention and memory in SLA. In C. Doughty, & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631–678). Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Individual differences, aptitude complexes, SLA processes and the development of language learning aptitude tests. In M. Pawlak (Ed.), New Perspectives on individual differences in language learning and teaching (pp. 89–109). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
(2016) Attention and awareness. In J. Cenoz & D. Gorter (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (3rd ed.). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Roehr, K., & Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A.
(2009) The status of metalinguistic knowledge in instructed adult L2 learning. Language Awareness, 18(2), 165–181. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Sáfár, A., & Kormos, J.
(2008) Revisiting problems with foreign language aptitude. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 46(2), 113–16. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Sagarra, N., & Herschensohn, J.
(2010) The role of proficiency and working memory in gender and number agreement processing in L1 and L2 Spanish. Lingua, 120(8), 2022–2039. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Sánchez, L.
(2011) Crosslinguistic influence in third language acquisition: English after German in Spanish Catalan learners in an instructed setting. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Barcelona.Google Scholar
(2012) ‘Luisa and Pedrito’s dog will the breakfast eat’: Interlanguage transfer and the role of the second language factor. In G. De Angelis & J. M. Dewaele (Eds.), New trends in crosslinguistic influence and multilingualism research (pp. 86–104). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2014) An inquiry into the role of L3 proficiency on crosslinguistic influence in third language acquisition. Odisea, Revista de Estudios Ingleses, 15, 169–188.Google Scholar
(2015) Can a background language alter the path of acquisition of verb placement in a multilingual context? Evidence from a longitudinal study. In G. De Angelis, U. Jessner, & M. Krésic (Eds.), Crosslinguistic influence and crosslinguistic interaction in language learning (pp. 71–94). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
under review). Crosslinguistic influence and working memory in L3 acquisition: A Correlational analysis.
Sánchez, L., & Bardel, C.
2016. Cognitive factors, perceptions and transfer in third language learning. Revue française de linguistique appliquée 2(21), 123–138.
Serafini, E., & Sanz, C.
(2015) Evidence for the decreasing impact of cognitive ability on second language development as proficiency increases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Available online at DOI logo.
Sanz, C., Lin, H. J., Lado, B., Stafford, C., & Bowden, H.
(2014) One size fits all? Learning conditions and working memory capacity in ab initio language development. Applied Linguistics DOI logo.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R.
(2001) Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shanon, B.
(1991) Faulty language selection in polyglots. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6(4), 339–350. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M.
(2010) Metalinguistic processing and acquisition within the MOGUL framework. In M. Everaert, T. Lentz, H. Mulder, Ø. Nilsen, & A. Zondervan (Eds.), The linguistics enterprise: From knowledge of language to knowledge in linguistics (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 150) (pp. 327–344). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M., & Truscott, J.
(2005) Stages or continua in second language acquisition: A MOGUL solution. Applied Linguistics, 26(2), 219–240. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Skehan, P.
(2001) Tasks and language performance assessment. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swai (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 167–185). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Stewart, C.
(2002) Memory. In E. Perry, H. Ashton, & A. Young. (Eds.), Neurochemistry of consciousness. Neurotransmitters in mind (Advances in Consciousness Research 36) (pp. 65–81). Amsterdam. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sumner, M., & Samuel, A.
(2007) Lexical inhibition and sublexical facilitation are surprisingly long lasting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 33(4), 769–790. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Tagarelli, K., Borges Mota, M., & Rebuschat, P.
(2014) Working memory, learning conditions, and the acquisition of L2 snytax. In W. Zhisheng, M. Borges Mota, & A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing: Theory, research and commentary (pp. 224–247). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Tellier, A., & Roehr-Brackin, K.
Thomas, J.
(1988) The role played by metalinguistic awareness in second and third language learning. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 9(3), 235–246. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Trude, A., & Tokowicz, N.
(2011) Negative transfer from Spanish and English to Portuguese pronunciation: The roles of inhibition and working memory. Language Learning, 61(1), 259–280. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T.
(2005) A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In C. Sanz (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition, (pp. 141–178). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, S., & Hammarberg, B.
(1998) Language switches in L3 production: Implications for a polyglot model. Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 295–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Young, B., & Pigott, S.
(1999) Neurobiological basis of consciousness. Archives of Neurology, 56(2), 153–157. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 19 other publications

Angelovska, Tanja & Angela Hahn
2017. L3 syntactic transfer – an integrative approach. In L3 Syntactic Transfer [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 5],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Angelovska, Tanja, Dietmar Roehm & Sabrina Weinmüller
2023. Uncovering transfer effects of dominance and proficiency in L3 English acquisition using the visual moving window paradigm and grammaticality judgments. Applied Linguistics Review 14:1  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Falk, Ylva & Camilla Bardel
2021. Transfer patterns in L3 learning discussed. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 11:1  pp. 50 ff. DOI logo
Foryś-Nogala, Małgorzata, Olga Broniś, Marcin Opacki & Agnieszka Otwinowska
2023. Cross-linguistic influences, language proficiency and metalinguistic knowledge in L3 Italian subject placement. International Journal of Multilingualism 20:2  pp. 308 ff. DOI logo
González Alonso, Jorge & Jason Rothman
2017. Chapter 12. From theory to practice in multilingualism. In L3 Syntactic Transfer [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 5],  pp. 277 ff. DOI logo
Jamali, Maryam, Ali Akbar Jabbari & Mohammad Hasan Razmi
2023. Acquisition of attributive adjectives and noun adjuncts by L3 learners of French and German: further evidence for the typological primacy model (TPM). International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:3  pp. 851 ff. DOI logo
Jo, Kyuhee, Kitaek Kim & Hyunwoo Kim
2021. Children's interpretation of negation and quantifier scope in L3 English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 24:3  pp. 427 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Hyunwoo, Kitaek Kim & Kyuhee Jo
2022. The role of crosslinguistic morphological congruency and L2 proficiency in the L3 acquisition of English plural marking. International Journal of Multilingualism  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kolb, Nadine, Natalia Mitrofanova & Marit Westergaard
2022. Crosslinguistic influence in child L3 English: An empirical study on Russian-German heritage bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism 26:4  pp. 476 ff. DOI logo
Kong, Stano
2023. The acquisition of L3 French present simple and present progressive by adult L1 Chinese speakers of L2 English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:2  pp. 655 ff. DOI logo
Lago, Sol, Michela Mosca & Anna Stutter Garcia
2021. The Role of Crosslinguistic Influence in Multilingual Processing: Lexicon Versus Syntax. Language Learning 71:S1  pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Marciszewska, Agnieszka A
2021. L3 morphosyntactic processing among Polish–English bilinguals: Considering learners’ level of bilingualism and language dominance. Open Linguistics 7:1  pp. 353 ff. DOI logo
Puig-Mayenco, Eloi, Jorge González Alonso & Jason Rothman
2020. A systematic review of transfer studies in third language acquisition. Second Language Research 36:1  pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Puig-Mayenco, Eloi, Jason Rothman & Susagna Tubau
2022. Language dominance in the previously acquired languages modulates rate of third language (L3) development over time: a longitudinal study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 25:5  pp. 1641 ff. DOI logo
Rothman, Jason, Jorge González Alonso & Eloi Puig-Mayenco
2019. Third Language Acquisition and Linguistic Transfer, DOI logo
Saturno, Jacopo
2022. Production of inflectional morphology in intercomprehension-based language teaching: the case of Slavic languages. International Journal of Multilingualism 19:3  pp. 383 ff. DOI logo
Vallerossa, Francesco, Anna Gudmundson, Anna Bergström & Camilla Bardel
2023. Learning aspect in Italian as additional language. The role of second languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:3  pp. 1139 ff. DOI logo
Westergaard, Marit
2021. Microvariation in multilingual situations: The importance of property-by-property acquisition. Second Language Research 37:3  pp. 379 ff. DOI logo
水英, 姚
2021. 香港大专生普通话学习中“了”的偏误分析: 对体习得普遍趋势和多语教学的启示. Chinese as a Second Language Research 10:1  pp. 131 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.