Cover not available
Part of
Bilingualism: A framework for understanding the mental lexicon
Edited by Maya Libben, Mira Goral and Gary Libben
[Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 6] 2017
► pp. 197–216

Morphological integration and the bilingual lexicon

In English, as in most of the world’s languages, the majority of words are multimorphemic. In the psycholinguistic literature on lexical processing in bilinguals, however, multimorphemic words have thus far received relatively little treatment. In this chapter, we discuss the opportunities that the study of multimorphemic words afford. We also consider the consequences that a multimorphemic perspective may have on the conceptualization of the bilingual mental lexicon in general and on the links among lexical reoperations within in. We present a study of compound processing among Hebrew-English bilinguals. These bilinguals performed a lexical decision task with constituent priming in both their languages. We investigated within and between language priming effects as well as differences among compound word types. Results point to a highly integrated lexical organization but also illustrate the complexity of such experimental studies.
Article outline
  • 1.The hypothesis of morphological integration
  • 2.Compound words as an ideal testing domain
  • 3.Compound structure in Hebrew and English
  • 4.A window to morphological integration
  • 5.Method
    • 5.1Participants
    • 5.2The multi-stage paradigm
    • 5.3Block A: Hebrew on its own
    • 5.4Block B: Hebrew targets and Hebrew and English primes
    • 5.5Block C: English on its own
    • 5.6Block D: English targets and Hebrew and English primes
    • 5.7Task procedure
  • 6.Results and conclusions
    • 6.1Prediction 1: Within language priming
    • 6.2Prediction 2: Cross language priming
    • 6.3Prediction 3: Cross-language morphological correspondence
  • 7.General discussion
  • Author note
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 20 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.6.09lib
References (23)
References
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, H. (1988). On the morphological parallelism between compounds and constructs. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology (pp. 45–65). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. (2009). Hebrew Compounds. In R. Lieber & P. Stekauer (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Compounding (pp. 491–511). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, C., Wang, M., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Acquisition of compound words in Chinese English bilingual children: Decomposition and cross-language activation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 583–600. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U. (2006). Compound types. In G. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 23–44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Duñabeitia, J. A., Dimitropoulou, M., Uribe-Etxebarria, O., Laka, I., & Carreiras, M. (2010). Electrophysiological correlates of the masked translation priming effect with highly proficient simultaneous bilinguals. Brain Research, 1359, 142–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldman, L. B., Barac-Cikoja, D., & Kostić, A. (2002). Semantic aspects of morphological processing: Transparency effects in Serbian. Memory and Cognition, 30, 629. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frost, R., Deutsch, A., Gilboa, O., Tannenbaum, M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2000). Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Memory and Cognition, 28, 1277–1288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gagné, C. L. (2001). Relation and lexical priming during the interpretation of noun-noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 236–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2009). Constituent integration during the processing of compound words: Does it involve the use of relational structures? Journal of Memory and Language, 60(1), 20–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jiang, N., & Forster, K. I. (2001). Cross-language priming asymmetries in lexical decision and episodic recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 32–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J. F. K., & De Groot, A. M. B. (2005). Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Libben, G., & Goral, M. (2015). How bilingualism shapes the mental lexicon. In J. W. Schwieter (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of bilingual processing (pp. 631–644). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Libben G., Jarema, G., Derwing, B., Riccardi, A., & Perlak, D. (2016). Seeking the -ational in derivational morphology. Aphasiology, 30(11), 1304–1324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Libben, G., Westbury, C., & Jarema, G. (2012). Embracing complexity. In G. Libben, G. Jarema, & C. Westbury (Eds.), Methodological and analytic frontiers in lexical research (pp. 1–12). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marelli, M., & Luzzatti, C. (2012). Frequency effects in the processing of Italian nominal compounds: Modulation of headedness and semantic transparency. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 644–664. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2007). Morphological processes in language comprehension. In G. Gaskell (Ed.), Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 175–193). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H. (1991). Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulder, K., Dijkstra, T., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2014). Effects of primary and secondary morphological family size in monolingual and bilingual word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 72, 59–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plag, I., Kunter, G., Lappe, S., & Braun, M. (2008). The role of semantics, argument structure, and lexicalisation in compound stress assignment in English. Language, 84(4), 760–794. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shabani-Jadidi, P. (2016). Compound verb processing in second language speakers of Persian. Iranian Studies, 49(1), 137–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarzwald, O. R. (2006). From discontinuous to linear word formation in Modern Hebrew. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 3(3), 1–11.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Kříž, Adam & Denisa Bordag
2023. The role of L1 translation form in L2 compound processing: the case of native Czech speakers processing German noun-noun compounds. Frontiers in Communication 8 DOI logo
Schmidtke, Daniel, Sadaf Rahmanian & Anna L. Moro
2022. Morphological knowledge in English learner university students is sensitive to language statistics: A longitudinal study. Applied Psycholinguistics 43:4 ► pp. 889 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Xin, Marcus Taft, Jie Wang & Say Young Kim
2021. Finding a “flower” in a “peanut” is as easy as in a “garden”: towards a lemma-based model of bilingual word recognition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 36:9 ► pp. 1076 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.