References

References

Álvarez, C., Cottrell, D., & Afonso, O.
(2009) Writing dictated words and picture names: Syllabic boundaries affect execution in Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 205–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Álvarez, C. J., Garcia-Saavedra, G. Luque, J. L., & Taft, M.
(2017) Syllabic parsing in children: A developmental study using visual word-spotting in Spanish. Journal of Child Language, 44, 380–401.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M.
(2007) Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cole, P., Magnan, A., & Grainger, J.
(1999) Syllable-sized units in visual word recognition: Evidence from skilled and beginning readers of French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 507–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M.
(2015) The corpus of contemporary American English (COCA). Retrieved http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/coca/ (August 1, 2015).
Ferrand, L., & New, B
(2003) Syllabic length effects in visual word. Acta Psychologica, 113, 167–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferrand, L., Segui, J., & Humphreys, G.
(2003) The syllable’s role in word naming. Memory & Cognition, 25, 458–470. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fry, E. B.
(2004) 1000 instant words: The most common words for teaching reading, writing, and spelling. Westminster, CA: Teacher Created Resources.Google Scholar
Haikio, T., Hyona, J., & Bertram, R.
(2015) The role of syllables in word recognition among beginning Finnish readers: Evidence from eye movements during reading. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, 562–577. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jared, D., & Seidenberg, M. S.
(1990) Naming multisyllabic words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 16(1), 92.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. L., & Eisler, M. E.
(2012) The importance of the first and last letters in words during sentence reading. Acta Psychologia, 141, 336–351. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H. S.
(2005) The frequency of modern Korean use. Seoul: National Institute of the Korean Language.Google Scholar
Lee, C. H., & Taft, M.
(2009) Are onsets and codas important in processing letter position? A comparison of TL effects in English and Korean. Journal of Memory and Language 60, 530–542. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. H., Kwon, Y., Kim, K., & Rastle, K.
(2015) Syllable transposition effects in Korean word recognition. Journal Psycholinguistic Research, 44, 309–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maionchi-Pino, N., de Cara, B., Ecalle, J., & Magnan, A.
(2015) Is syllable segmentation developmentally constrained by consonant sonority within syllable boundaries in silent reading? Evidence in French children. Journal of Research in Reading, 38, 226–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pae, H. K.
(2012) A psychometric measurement model for adult English language learners: Pearson Test of English Academic. Educational Research and Evaluation, 18, 211–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) The Korean writing system, Hangul, and word processing. In H. K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese, and Korean languages. (pp. 1–21). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pae, H. K., Greenberg, D., & Morris, R. D.
(2012) Construct validity and measurement invariance of the PPVT in the performance of struggling adult readers. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9, 152–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taft, M.
(1992) The body of the BOSS: Subsyllabic units in the lexical processing of polysyllabic words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1004–1014.Google Scholar
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A.
(1999) Test of word reading efficiency (TOWRE). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A.
(1999) Comprehensive test of phonological processing (CTOPP). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.Google Scholar
Wolf, M., & Denckla, M. B.
(2005) Rapid automatized naming and rapid alternating stimulus tests (RAN/RAS). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U.
(2005) Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar