Cover not available
Part of
Reception Studies and Audiovisual Translation
Edited by Elena Di Giovanni and Yves Gambier
[Benjamins Translation Library 141] 2018
► pp. 21–41

Chapter 2
Film, cinema and reception studies

Revisiting research on audience’s filmic and cinematic experiences

This chapter aims at introducing the reader into the field of film reception studies, more particular into the field which deals with audience’s contemporary and historical filmic and cinematic experiences. After providing an historical overview of this expanding field, the chapter goes into the various strands of cinema and film reception research. The contribution argues that in recent years, this field of research grew into an ever more mature, inter- and multidisciplinary domain, where perspectives are now utilized, which were often neglected within film studies so far, like ethnographic research, memory studies, social geography, urban studies, history, or the digital humanities. Much of this recent work is driven by the idea that a perspective on audience’s ‘bottom up’ experiences of films and cinema, leads to a more profound understanding and eventually to a revision of theories, concepts, and the history of film and cinema. This chapter is to be seen as part of the scholarly endeavour, often called ‘new cinema history’, which aims at rewriting film’s and cinema’s past precisely by integrating audiences’ experiences.
Keywords: Film audiences, filmic experiences, cinematic experiences, new cinema history, film history
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Growth of, and perspectives to, film audience research
    • 2.1An historical perspective
    • 2.2Major trends
  • 3.Filmic and cinematic experiences in the past
    • 3.1Audiences and reception
    • 3.2A broad spectrum of methods
    • 3.3Six different stands of film/cinema audience research
  • 4.Contemporary filmic and cinematic experiences
    • 4.1Reception of particular movies
    • 4.2Other perspectives on film consumption
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 15 June 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.141.03bil
References (109)
References
Allen, Robert C. 1990. “From exhibition to reception: Reflections on the audience in film history”. Screen 31 (4): 347–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999. “Home alone together: Hollywood and the family film”. In Identifying Hollywood’s audiences: Cultural identity and the movies, Melvyn Stokes, and Richard Maltby (eds), 109–134. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
Allen, Robert C. and Gomery, Douglas. 1985. Film History: Theory and Practice. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Altenloh, Emilie. 1914/1977. Zur Soziologie des Kino: Die Kino-unternehmung und die sozialen Schichten ihrer besucher. Leipzig: Spamerschen Buchdruckerei.Google Scholar
Austin, Thomas. 2002. Hollywood, hype and audiences. Manchester: Manchester UP.Google Scholar
Aveyard, Karina. 2015. Lure of the big screen: cinema in rural Australia and the United Kingdom. Bristol: Intellect.Google Scholar
Barker, Martin. 1999. “Film audience research: Making a virtue out of a necessity”. Iris, 26: 131–147.Google Scholar
Barker, Martin and Brooks, Kate. 1998. Knowing audiences. Luton: John Libbey.Google Scholar
Barker, Martin, Arthurs, Jane and Harindranath, Ramaswani. 2001. The Crash controversy. London: Wallflower Press.Google Scholar
Barker, Martin and Mathijs, Ernest (eds). 2007. Watching the Lord of the Rings: Tolkien’s World Audiences. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Basic Instinct (film), USA, dir: Paul Verhoeven.
Barker, Martin and Mathijs, Ernest. 2016. “Introduction: The World Hobbit Project,” Participations, 13(2): 159–174.Google Scholar
Biltereyst, Daniel. 2005. “Youth, moral panics and the end of cinema. On the reception of ‘Rebel without a Cause’ in Europe”. In Rebel without a Cause: Approaches to a Maverick Masterwork. David Slocum (ed), 171–189. New York: SUNY.Google Scholar
Biltereyst, Daniel, Maltby, Richard and Meers, Philippe (eds). 2012. Cinema, audiences and modernity. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
(eds). 2018. The Routledge Companion to New Cinema History. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Biltereyst, Daniel and Meers, Philippe. 2011. “The political economy of audiences”. In The handbook of political economy of communications. Janet Wasko, Graham Murdoch, and Helena Sousa (eds), 415–435. Malden: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biltereyst, Daniel, Meers, Philippe and Van de Vijver, Liesbet. 2011. “Social Class, Experiences of Distinctions and Cinema in Postwar Ghent”. In Explorations in New Cinema History. Richard Maltby, Daniel Biltereyst, and Philippe Meers (eds), 101–124. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biltereyst, Daniel and Van de Vijver, Liesbet. 2016. “Cinema in the ‘Fog City’: Film Exhibition and Sociogeography in Flanders”. In Cinema Beyond the City: Small-Towns & Rural Film Culture in Europe. Judith Thissen & Clemens Zimmerman (eds), 223–236. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
(eds). 2018. Mapping Movie Magazines. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Blumer, Hurbert. 1933. Movies and conduct. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bobo, Jacqueline. 1988. “The Colour Purple: Black women as cultural readers”. In Female spectators: Looking at film and television. E. Deidre Pribam (ed), 90–109. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bolin, Göran. 2000. “Film swapping in the public sphere: Youth audiences and alternative cultural publicities”. Javnost – The Public, 7(2): 57–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bordwell, David. 1985. Narration in the fiction film. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
. 1997. On the history of film style. Cambridge: Harvard UP.Google Scholar
Bordwell, David, Thompson, Kristin and Staiger, Janet. 1985. The classical Hollywood cinema. London/New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Branigan, Edward and Buckland, Warren. 2015. The Routledge Encyclopedia of Film Theory. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bram Stoker’s Dracula (film), USA, dir: Francis Ford Coppola.
Burt, Cyril. 1925. The Young Delinquent. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Casetti, F., 1998. Inside the gaze: The fiction film and its spectator. Bloomington: Indiana UP.Google Scholar
Chapman, James, Glancey, Mark and Harper, Sue (eds). 2007. The New Film History. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christie, Ian. 2012. Audiences: Defining and researching screen entertainment. Amsterdam: Amsterdam UP.Google Scholar
Church, David. 2015. Grindhouse Nostalgia. Memory, Home video, and Exploitation Film Fandom. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Kevin. 1998. “Empty seats: The missing history of movie-watching. Journal of Film and Video, 50 (4): 34–48.Google Scholar
Crash (film), 1996, Canada/UK, dir: David Cronenberg.
DeCordova, Richard. 1990/2002. “Ethnography and Exhibition: The child Audience, the Hays Office, and Saturday Matinees”. In Moviegoing in America. Waller, Gregory (ed), 159–169. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dudrah, Rajinder. 2002. “Vilayati Bollywood: Popular Hindi cinema-going and diasporic South Asian identity in Birmingham”, Javnost – The Public, 9: 19–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dyer, Richard. 1986. Heavenly bodies: Film stars and society. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Fuller-Seeley, Katherine and Potamianos, George. 2008. “Introduction: Researching and writing the history of local moviegoing”. In Hollywood in the neighborhood: Historical case studies of local moviegoing. Kathryn Fuller-Seeley (ed), 3–19. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gelly, Christophe and Roche, David. 2012. Approaches to film and reception theories. Clermont-Ferrand: Presses Universitaires Blaise Pascal.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Marie. 1995. Television, ethnicity and cultural change. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gomery, Douglas. 1992. Shared pleasures: A history of movie presentation in the United States. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Grieveson, Lee. 1999. “Why the audience mattered in Chicago in 1907”. In American movie audiences: From the turn of the century to the early sound era. Melvyn Stokes, and Richard Maltby (eds), 79–91. London: BFI.Google Scholar
Gripsrud, Jostein. 1998. “Film audiences”. In The Oxford guide to film studies. John Hill, and Pamela Church Gibson (eds), 202–211. Oxford: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
Hansen, Miriam. 1991. Babel and Babylon: Spectatorship in American silent film. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.Google Scholar
Harper, Sue. 2006. “Fragmentation and Crisis.” Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 26 (3): 361–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Annette. 1997. Shocking entertainment: Viewer response to violent movies. Luton: John Libbey.Google Scholar
Hills, Matt. 2002. Fan Cultures. London/New York: Routledge.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jancovich, Mark, Faire, Lucy and Stubbings, Sarah. 2003. The place of the audience: Cultural geographies of film consumption. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
Jarvie, Ian. 1970. Movies and Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Henry. 2000. “Reception theory and audience research: The mystery of the vampire’s kiss”. In Reinventing film studies, Christine Gledhill and Linda Williams (eds) 165–182. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
. 2006. Convergence culture: where old and new media collide. New York: New York UP.Google Scholar
Jernudd, Asa. 2013. “Cinema Memory: National Identity as Expressed by Swedish Elders in an Oral History Project.” Northern Lights 11: 109–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Judge Dredd (film), 1995, USA, dir: Danny Cannon.
Jurca, Catharine, and John Sedgwick. 2014. “The Film’s the Thing: Moviegoing in Philadelphia, 1935–36.” Film History 26 (4): 58–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jowett, Garth, Jarvie, Ian, Fuller, Kathryn. 1996. Children and the Movies. New York: Cambridge UP.Google Scholar
Kääpä, Pietari and Wenbo, Guan. 2011 “Santa Claus in China and Wu xia in Finland”, Participations, 8 (2): 24–51.Google Scholar
Klinger, Barbara. 1997. “Film history terminable and interminable: Recovering the past in reception studies”. Screen, 38 (2): 107–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krämer, Peter 2011 “‘Movies that make people sick’”, Participations, 8 (2): 416–430.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Annette. 1984. “Women’s genres”. Screen, 25 (1): 18–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. “Cinema culture and femininity in 1930s Britain”. In Nationalising Femininity, Christine Gledhill and Gillian Swanson (eds), 177–192. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
. 2002. An everyday magic: Cinema and cultural memory. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Annette, Biltereyst, Daniel and Meers, Philippe. 2017. “Memories of cinemagoing and film experience: An introduction”, Memory Studies, 10 (1): 3–16.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langdale, Allan. 2002. Hugo Münsterberg on film: The Photoplay. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lapsley, R. and Westlake, M., 2006. Film theory: An introduction. Manchester: Manchester UP.Google Scholar
Lewis, Jon and Smoodin, Eric (eds). 2007. Looking Past the Screen. Durham: Duke UP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynd, Robert S. and Lynd, Helen Merrell 1929/1956 Middletown: A Study in Modern American Culture. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Maltby, Richard, 2006. “On the prospect of writing cinema history from below”, Tijdschrift voor Mediageschiedenis, 9(2): 74–96.Google Scholar
2007. “How Can Cinema History Matter More?” Screening the Past 22. < [URL]>Google Scholar
. 2011. “New Cinema Histories”. In Explorations in new cinema history. Richard Maltby, Daniel Biltereyst and Philippe Meers (eds), 3–40. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maltby, Richard, Biltereyst, Daniel and Meers, Philippe (eds). 2011. Explorations in new cinema history: Approaches and case studies. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, Richard. 2000. “Surveillance and other consuming encounters in the informational marketplace”. In Consuming audiences? Production and reception in media research. Ingunn Hagen and Janet Wasko (eds), 95–110. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Meers, Philippe, Biltereyst, Daniel and Van de Vijver, Liesbet. 2010. “Metropolitan vs rural cinemagoing in Flanders, 1925–1975”, Screen, 51(3): 272–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Metz, Chistian. 1975/1984. Le signifiant imaginaire: Psychanalyse et cinéma. Paris: Bourgeois.Google Scholar
Miller, Toby, Govil, Nitin, McMurria, John and Maxwell, Richard, 2001. Global Hollywood. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
Mulvey, Laura. 1975. 1999 reprint. “Visual pleasure and narrative cinema”. In Feminist Film Theory. A reader. Sue Thornham (ed), 58–69. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Münsterberg, Hugo. 1916. The Photoplay. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Natural Born Killers (film), 1994, USA, dir: Oliver Stone.
Naficy, Hamid. 1993. The making of exile cultures: Iranian television in Los Angeles. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Nightingale, Virginia. (ed) 2011. The Handbook of Media Audiences. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pribam, Deidre. 1988. “Female spectators: Looking at film and television”. In Female spectators: Looking at film and television. Deidre Pribam (ed), 1–11. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Prince, Stephen. 1996. “Psychoanalytic film theory and the problem of the missing spectator”. In Post-theory: Reconstructing film studies. David Bordwell and Noel Carroll (eds), 71–86. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Rall, Veronica. 1990. “Altenloh”. In The Women’s Companion to International Film, Annette Kuhn and Susannah Radstone (eds), 12–13. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Richards, Helen. 2003. “Memory reclamation of cinema going in Bridgend, South Wales, 1930–1960”. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 23 (4): 341–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sedgwick, John. 2000. Popular Filmgoing in 1930s Britain. A Choice of Pleasures. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Patterns in First-Run and Suburban Filmgoing in Sydney in the mid-1930s.” In Explorations in New Cinema Histories: Approaches and Case Studies. Richard Maltby, Daniel Biltereyst and Philippe Meers (eds), 140–158. Malden: Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smythe, Dallas. 2001. “On the audience commodity and its work”. In Media and cultural studies. Meenakshi Gigi Durham and Douglas Kellner (eds), 253–279. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stacey, J., 1994. Star gazing: Hollywood cinema and female spectatorship in 1940s and 1950s Britain. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Staiger, Jackie. 1986. “‘The handmaiden of villainy’: Methods and problems in studying the historical reception of film”. Wide Angle, 8 (1): 19–27.Google Scholar
. 1992. Interpreting films: Studies in the historical reception of American cinema. Princeton: Princeton UP.Google Scholar
Staiger, Janet. 2000. Perverse spectators: The practices of film reception. New York: New York UP.Google Scholar
. 2005. Media reception studies. New York: New York UP.Google Scholar
Stokes, Melvyn. 1999. “Introduction: Reconstructing American cinema’s audiences”. In American movie audiences: From the turn of the century to the early sound era. Melvyn Stokes and Richard Maltby (eds), 1–14. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Audiences in Cinema History”. In Approaches to film and reception theories, Christophe Gelly and David Roche (eds), 31–53. Clermont-Ferrand: Presses Universitaires Blaise Pascal.Google Scholar
Stokes, Melvyn and Maltby, Richard (eds). 1999. American movie audiences: From the turn of the century to the early sound era. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Sara. 2010. “Child Audiences in America’s Nickelodeons, 1900–1915: The Keith/Albee Managers’ Reports”, Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 30 (2): 155–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Helen. 1989. Scarlett’s women: ‘Gone with the wind’ and its female fans. London: Virago.Google Scholar
Thissen, Judith and Zimmerman, Clemens (eds). 2016. Cinema Beyond the City: Small-Towns & Rural Film Culture in Europe. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
Treveri Gennari, Daniela and Sedgwick, John. 2015. “Memories in Context: The Social and Economic Function of Cinema in 1950s Rome.” Film History 27 (2): 76–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Treveri Gennari, Daniela, Dibeltulo, Silvia, Hipkins, Danielle and O’Rawe, Catherine. 2018. “Analysing Memories through Video-Interviews: A Case Study of Post-War Italian Cinema-going”. In The Routledge Companion to New Cinema History. Daniel Biltereyst, Richard Maltby and Philippe Meers (eds) London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Treveri Gennari, Daniela, Hipkins, Danielle and O’Rawe, Catherine (eds). 2018. Cinema outside the City. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
Turner, Graeme (eds). 2002. The film cultures reader. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Uricchio, William and Pearson, Roberta. 1999. “‘The formative and impressionable stage’: Discursive constructions of the nickelodeon’s child audience”. In American movie audiences: From the turn of the century to the early sound era. Melvyn Stokes and Richard Maltby (eds), 64–75. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
Vandevelde, Iris, Philippe Meers, Sofie Van Bauwel, and Roel Vande Winkel. 2015. “Sharing the Silver Screen: The Social Experience of Cinemagoing in the Indian Diaspora”. Bioscope-South Asian Screen Studies 6 (1): 88–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van de Vijver, Lies, and Daniel Biltereyst. 2013. “Cinemagoing as a Conditional Part of Everyday Life: Memories of Cinemagoing in Ghent from the 1930s to the 1970s”. Cultural Studies, 27 (4): 561–584. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, Deb. 2012. “New Cinema History and the Computational Turn.” Beyond Art, Beyond Humanities, Beyond Technology: A New Creativity. Proceedings of the World Congress of Communication and the Arts Conference, University of Minho. [URL]Google Scholar
Wasko, Janet and Meehan, Eileen. 2001. “Dazzled by Disney? Ambiguity in ubiquity”. In Dazzled by Disney? The Global Disney Audiences project. Janet Wasko, Mark Phillips and Eileen Meehan (eds), 329–343. London: Leicester UP.Google Scholar
Wasko, Janet, Phillips, Mark and Meehan, Eileen. 2001. Dazzled by Disney? The Global Disney Audiences project. London/New York: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. 1974. Television : Technology and Cultural Form. London: Fontana. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willis, Andy. 1995. “Cultural studies and popular film”. In Approaches to popular film. J. Hollows and M. Jancovich (eds), 173–191. Manchester/New York: Manchester UP.Google Scholar
Cited by (15)

Cited by 15 other publications

Akbulut, Hasan
2024. Cinema-Going in Turkey between 1960 and 1980: Cinema Memories, Film Culture, and Modernity. In The Palgrave Handbook of Comparative New Cinema Histories, ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
DeFeo, Dayna Jean, Rebeca Maseda García & Zeynep Kılıç
2024. Identifying and interpreting gendered violence: Visual literacy in an audience reception study of Issa López' Casi Divas. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy DOI logo
Salam-Salmaoui, Rauha & Shazrah Salam
2024.  Reclaiming Femininity: A Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis of Pakistani Web Series Churails ’ Title Track “ Doosra Janum ” . Women's Studies in Communication 47:2 ► pp. 218 ff. DOI logo
Gomes, Christianne Luce
2023. Female domestic work and social changes in a Brazilian fiction film: insights about the reflective dividend. Feminist Media Studies ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Raffi, Francesca
2023. Accessibility and reception studies at the Macerata Opera Festival. Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts 9:3 ► pp. 398 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Cheng, Bin Xu, Jong-Hoon Yang, Mi Liu & Qiangyi Li
2022. Sentiment Analysis of Animated Film Reviews Using Intelligent Machine Learning. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2022 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Fantoni, Gianluca, Marco Paoli & Armando Rotondi
2022. Representations of ‘Italian populism’ in film. Modern Italy 27:1 ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
ÖZKAR, Melek
2022. Geçmişte Bir Mekân Günümüzde Bir Anı: Sözlü Tarihle 1990’lı Yılların Eskişehir’inde Sinemaya Gitme Deneyimi Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Selçuk İletişim 15:2 ► pp. 801 ff. DOI logo
Cuelenaere, Eduard
2020. Towards an Integrative Methodological Approach of Film Remake Studies. Adaptation 13:2 ► pp. 210 ff. DOI logo
Cuelenaere, Eduard
2021. Originality versus proximity: An explorative study of audience reactions to monolingual film remakes. International Journal of Cultural Studies 24:2 ► pp. 233 ff. DOI logo
Di Giovanni, Elena
2020. Reception Studies and Audiovisual Translation. In The Palgrave Handbook of Audiovisual Translation and Media Accessibility [Palgrave Studies in Translating and Interpreting, ], ► pp. 397 ff. DOI logo
Perego, Elisa & Ralph Pacinotti
2020. Audiovisual Translation through the Ages. In The Palgrave Handbook of Audiovisual Translation and Media Accessibility [Palgrave Studies in Translating and Interpreting, ], ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Thangavelu, Asha Priya
2020. Film as a Reflection of Society. In Handbook of Research on Social and Cultural Dynamics in Indian Cinema [Advances in Religious and Cultural Studies, ], ► pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
Gambier, Yves & Haina Jin
2019. A connected history of audiovisual translation. Translation Spaces 8:2 ► pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Bibliography. In Reception of Mesopotamia on Film, ► pp. 200 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.