This chapter discusses the use of eye tracking in combination with other methods for collecting and analysing translation process data in the workplace. Building on O’Brien (2009) and Teixeira (2014), we account for recent advances in eye-tracking technology and cover expanded use cases in which we have tested our previous recommendations. The methodological discussion is illustrated with a case study whose aim was two-fold: to map the use of tools by translators in a translation company and to investigate the gaze behaviour of those translators on the graphical user interface of a specific translation tool from a cognitive ergonomics perspective. The chapter covers from general topics such as the aspects to be considered when selecting an eye tracker, finding suitable participants and configuring the eye-tracking software, to more specific topics such as how to synchronise logs across tools, how to segment the recordings and whether it is better to use data from one eye or from both eyes. Based on a concrete experiment and on the authors’ previous experiences with similar research scenarios, the chapter discusses what one can or cannot do with eye tracking in Translation Process Research in general, and the challenges related to the use of a mobile eye tracker in the workplace in particular. We present our approach for using eye tracking in such a scenario and suggest possibilities for analysing the data in a meaningful way.
Carl, Michael, Srinivas Bangalore, and Moritz Schaeffer
(eds)2016New Directions in Empirical Translation Process Research: Exploring the CRITT TPR-DB. New Frontiers in Translation Studies. Cham: Springer.
Daems, Joke, Michael Carl, Sonia Vandepitte, Robert Hartsuiker, and Lieve Macken
2016 “The Effectiveness of Consulting External Resources During Translation and Post-editing of General Text Types.” In New Directions in Empirical Translation Process Research: Exploring the CRITT TPR-DB, ed. by Michael Carl, Srinivas Bangalore, and Moritz Schaeffer, 111–133. New Frontiers in Translation Studies. Cham: Springer.
Dragsted, Barbara
2012 “Indicators of Difficulty in Translation – Correlating Product and Process Data.” Across Languages and Cultures 13 (1): 81–98..
Duchowski, Andrew T.
2009Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. London: Springer.
Duchowski, Andrew T., Krzysztof Krejtz, Izabela Krejtz, Cezary Biele, Anna Niedzielska, Peter Kiefer, Martin Raubal, and Ioannis Giannopoulos
2018 “The Index of Pupillary Activity.” In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference, ed. by Regan Mandryk, Mark Hancock, Mark Perry, and Anna Cox, 1–13. New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Ehrensberger-Dow, Maureen
2014 “Challenges of Translation Process Research at the Workplace.” In MonTI Special Issue – Minding Translation, ed. by Ricardo Muñoz Martín, 355–383. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante.
1964 “Pupil Size in Relation to Mental Activity During Simple Problem-Solving.” Science 143 (3611): 1190–1192..
Holmqvist, Kenneth, Richard Dewhurst, Halszka Jarodzka, Marcus Nyström, Richard Andersson, and Joost C. van de Weijer
2015Eye Tracking: A Comprehensive Guide to Methods and Measures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hvelplund, Kristian Tangsaard
2014 “Eye Tracking and the Translation Process: Reflections on the Analysis and Interpretation of Eye-Tracking Data.” In MonTI Special Issue – Minding Translation, ed. by Ricardo Muñoz Martín, 201–223. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante.
Iqbal, Shamsi T., Piotr D. Adamczyk, Xianjun S. Zheng, and Brian P. Bailey
2005 “Towards an Index of Opportunity.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems – CHI ‘05, ed. by Gerrit van der Veer, and Carolyn Gale, 311–320. New York, USA: ACM Press.
Just, Marcel A., and Patricia A. Carpenter
1980 “A Theory of Reading: From Eye Fixations to Comprehension.” Psychological Review 87 (4): 329–354..
Kruger, Jan-Louis, María T. Soto-Sanfiel, Stephen Doherty, and Ronny Ibrahim
2011 “Innovative Subtitling: A Reception Study.” In Methods and Strategies of Process Research: Integrative Approaches in Translation Studies, ed. by Cecilia Alvstad, Adelina Hild, and Elisabet Tiselius, 187–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Larson, Adam M., and Lester C. Loschky
2009 “The Contributions of Central Versus Peripheral Vision to Scene Gist Recognition.” Journal of Vision 9 (10): 6..
Moran, John, David Lewis, and Christian Saam
2014 “Analysis of Post-Editing Data: a Productivity Field Test Using an Instrumented CAT Tool.” In Post-Editing of Machine Translation: Processes and Applications, ed. by Sharon O’Brien, Laura Balling, Michael Carl, Michel Simard, and Lucia Specia, 126–146. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Nakayama, Minoru, Koji Takahashi, and Yasutaka Shimizu
2002 “The Act of Task Difficulty and Eye-movement Frequency for the ‘Oculo-motor Indices’.” In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications – ETRA ‘02, ed. by Andrew T. Duchowski, Roel Vertegaal, and John W. Senders, 37–42. New York, USA: ACM Press.
O’Brien, Sharon
2006 “Eye-tracking and Translation Memory Matches.” Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 14 (3): 185–205..
O’Brien, Sharon
2009 “Eye Tracking in Translation Process Research: Methodological Challenges and Solutions.” In Methodology, Technology and Innovation in Translation Process Research: A Tribute to Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, ed. by Inger Mees, Fabio Alves, and Susanne Göpferich, 251–266. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
O’Brien, Sharon, Minako O’Hagan, and Marian Flanagan
2010 “Keeping an Eye on the UI Design of Translation Memory: How do Translators Use the Concordance Feature?” In Proceedings of the 28th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, ed. by Willem-Paul Brinckman, and Mark Neerincx, 187–190. Delft University of Technology.
Orrego-Carmona, David
2016 “A Reception Study on Non-professional Subtitling: Do Audiences Notice Any Difference?” Across Languages and Cultures 17 (2): 163–181..
Posner, Michael I.
1980 “Orienting of Attention.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32 (1): 3–25..
2014 “Data Collection Methods for Researching the Interaction Between Translators and Translation Tools: An ‘Ecological’ Approach.” In The Development of Translation Competence: Theories and Methodologies from Psycholinguistics and Cognitive Science, ed. by John W. Schwieter, and Aline Ferreira, 269–286. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
2008Orienting of Attention. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
Cited by 6 other publications
Cui, Ying, Xiao Liu & Yuqin Cheng
2023. A Comparative Study on the Effort of Human Translation and Post-Editing in Relation to Text Types: An Eye-Tracking and Key-Logging Experiment. SAGE Open 13:1 ► pp. 215824402311558 ff.
2021. The Cognitive Paradigm in Translation Studies. In An Eye-Tracking Study of Equivalent Effect in Translation, ► pp. 13 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.