Cover not available
Part of
Linking up with Video: Perspectives on interpreting practice and research
Edited by Heidi Salaets and Geert Brône
[Benjamins Translation Library 149] 2020
► pp. 79–105

Chapter 3
Remote interpreting in dialogic settings

A methodological framework for investigating the impact of telephone and video interpreting on quality in healthcare interpreting

Just as remote communication by telephone and through the internet has become an integral part of our daily lives and professional environments, it has also gained a firm footing in the practice of interpreting. In medical settings, remote interpreting is increasingly being welcomed as a means to enable better access to healthcare and increased cost-efficiency. Studies on healthcare interpreting over the telephone or by video link have generated predominantly positive results concerning the use of remote modes of interpreting. However, most of these studies originate from medical science and measure user satisfaction with the interpreting mode (face-to-face, telephone interpreting or video interpreting) rather than the possible impact of the different modes on interpreting quality. In interpreting studies, empirical research investigating remote interpreting in medical settings is scarce, but studies on remote interpreting in settings such as conference, business and legal interpreting indicate that the remote conditions are at the very least perceived by users to influence the interpreter’s performance and the communication.

In this chapter, we introduce a methodological framework for a systematic assessment of the quality of remote interpreting and the effectiveness of the communication in dialogic healthcare settings, drawing on methods from both interpreting studies and medicine. Central to the research design is a corpus of simulations of interpreter-mediated doctor – patient encounters, performed in the modes face-to-face, telephone and video interpreting. These simulations were submitted to a comparative, multi-modal analysis, the results of which were triangulated with the subjective assessment by the participants.

We will first touch upon research issues and caveats relevant to remote healthcare interpreting, emerging from medical studies and interpreting studies. Subsequently, the research design of the present study will be elaborated, followed by a discussion of the preliminary findings of the first series of simulations. Although the data analysis is work in progress, the first outcomes suggest that the use of technology in interpreter-mediated health care impacts mostly on the interactional dynamics of the communication.

Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.Definitions
  • 2.Studies on RI in health care settings
    • 2.1Medical studies
    • 2.2Interpreting studies
      • 2.2.1Telephone interpreting
      • 2.2.2Video interpreting
        • 2.2.2.1Video interpreting in health care settings
  • 3.Proposal for a methodological framework
    • 3.1Research questions
    • 3.2Quality assessment in interpreting
    • 3.3Research design
    • 3.4Research proceedings
    • 3.5Annotation
      • 3.5.1Annotation categories
        • 3.5.1.1Issues
        • 3.5.1.2Interaction management
        • 3.5.1.3Environment and technology
    • 3.6Data analysis
    • 3.7Preliminary findings
  • 4.Conclusion and discussion
  • References
Published online: 13 January 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.149.04boe
References
Altman, Janet
1994 “Error analysis in the teaching of simultaneous interpreting: a pilot study.” In Bridging the Gap. Empirical Research in Simultaneous Interpretation, ed. by Sophie Lambert, and Barbara Moser-Mercer, 25–38. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Linda
1994 “Simultaneous interpretation. Contextual and translation aspects.” In Bridging the Gap: Empirical Research in Simultaneous Interpretation, ed. by Sophie Lambert and, Barbara Moser-Mercer, 101–120. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Angelelli, Claudia V.
2004 Medical Interpreting and Cross-cultural Communication. London: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Balogh, Katalin, and Erik Hertog, Erik
2012 “Avidicus comparative studies – part II: Traditional, videoconference and remote interpreting in police interviews.” In Videoconference and remote interpreting in criminal proceedings, ed. by Sabine Braun and Judith Taylor, 101–116. Guildford: University of Surrey.Google Scholar
Baker, Mona
2006 “Contextualization in translator- and interpreter-mediated events.” Journal of Pragmatics 38: 321–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Balzani, Maurizio
1990 “Le contact visuel en interprétation simultanée: résultats d'une expérience (Français-Italien).” In Aspects of applied and experimental research on conference interpretation, ed. by Laura Gran, and Christopher Taylor, 93–100. Udine: Campanotto.Google Scholar
Baraldi, Claudia, and Laura Gavioli
2012 Coordinating participation in dialogue interpreting. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baraldi, Claudia and Laura Gavioli
2014 “Are close renditions the golden standard? Some thoughts on translating accurately in healthcare interpreter-mediated interaction.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer. 8(3): 336–353. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/
. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barik, Henri C.
1994 “A description of various types of omissions, additions and errors of translation encountered in simultaneous interpretation.” In Bridging the Gap. Empirical Research in Simultaneous Interpretation, ed. by Sophie Lambert and Barbara Moser-Mercer, 124–138. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braun, Sabine and Kurt Kohn
2001 “Dolmetschen in der Videokonferenz. Kommunikative Kompetenz und Monitoringstrategien.” In Kultur und Translation: Methodologische Probleme des Kulturtransfers, ed. by G. Thome, C. Giehl and H. Gerzymisch-Arbogast (eds), 3–32. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Braun, Sabine
2003 “Kommunikation unter widrigen Umständen? Optimierungsstrategien in zweisprachigen Videokonferenz-Gesprächen.” In Connecting Perspectives. Videokonferenz: Beiträge zu ihrer Erforschung und Anwendung, ed. by Jana Döring, Walter Schmitz, and Olaf Schulte, 167–185. Aachen: Shaker.Google Scholar
2004 Kommunikation unter widrigen Umständen? Fallstudien zu einsprachigen und gedolmetschten Videokonferenzen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
2015a “Remote interpreting.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Interpreting Studies, ed. by Franz Pöchhacker, 346–348. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2015b “Videoconference interpreting.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Interpreting Studies, ed. by Franz Pöchhacker, 437–439. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Braun, Sabine and Judith Taylor
2012 Videoconference and remote interpreting in criminal proceedings. Guildford: University of Surrey. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
2013 Developing the use of technical tools in cross-border Resettlement (DUTT). Videoconference communication in cross-border resettlement. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Brinkman, William B. et al.
2007 “Effect of multisource feedback on resident communication skills and professionalism: a randomized controlled trial.” Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 161(1): 44–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bühler, Hildegrund
1985 “Conference Interpreting: a multichannel communication phenomenon.” Meta 30(1): 49–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrne, Patrick S. and Barrie Long
1984/1976 Doctors talking to patients: A study of the verbal behaviours of doctors in the consultation. Exeter: Royal College of General Practitioners.Google Scholar
Cirillo, Letizia
2010 “Managing affect in interpreter-mediated institutional talk: examples from the medical setting.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 14: 55–79.Google Scholar
Connell, Tim
2006 “The application of new technologies to remote interpreting.” In Taking stock: Research and Methodology in Community Interpreting [Linguistica Antverpiensia 5], ed. by Erik Hertog and Bart van der Veer, 311–324.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia, Thompson, Sandra, Suzukia, Ryoko, and Taob, Hongyin
1996 “The conversational use of reactive tokens in English, Japanese, and Mandarin”. Journal of Pragmatics 26(3): 355–387.
https://doi.org/
. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Corey, Garruba, Marie, and Melder, Angela
2017 “Patient satisfaction of telephone or video interpreter services compared with in-person services: a systematic review.” Australian Health Review 42(2): 168–177. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crossman, Kristen L. et al.
2010 “Interpreters: Telephonic, In-Person Interpretation and Bilingual Providers.” Pediatrics, 125(3): 631–638. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flores, Glenn et al.
2003 “Errors in medical interpretation and their potential clinical consequences in pediatric encounters.” Pediatrics 111: 6–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Errors of medical interpretation and their potential clinical consequences: a comparison of professional versus ad hoc versus no interpreters.” Annals of Emergency Medicine 60(5): 545–553. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gany, Francesca et al.
2007a “Patient satisfaction with different interpreting methods: a randomized controlled trial.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 22 (2): 312–318. Retrieved from [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007b “The Impact of Medical Interpretation Method on Time and Errors.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 22(2): 319–323. Retrieved from [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1979 “The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 97–121. Irvington Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
1981 Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Grbić, Nadja
2015 “Quality.” In Routledge encyclopedia of interpreting studies, ed. by Franz Pöchhacker, 333–336. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J.
1982 Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992 “Contextualization and understanding.” In Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, and Charles Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hatim, Basel, and Ian Mason
1990 Discourse and the Translator. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Heath, Christian
1992 “The delivery and reception of diagnosis in the general-practice consultation.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
1985 “Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of production of talk for an overhearing audience”. In Handbook of discourse analysis, Vol. 3. Discourse and dialogue, ed. by Teun van Dijk, 95–117. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Douglas Maynard
2006 Communication in Medical Care: Interaction between primary care physicians and patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henrdon, James et al.
(2002) “Continuing concerns, new challenges, and next steps in physician-patient communication.” The Journal of bone and joint surgery 84-A (2): 309–315.Google Scholar
Hornberger, John. et al.
1996 “Eliminating language barriers for non-English-speaking patients.” Medical Care 34(8): 845–856. Retrieved from [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, Elaine
2017 “Conceptualizing bilingual health communication: a theory-based approach to interpreter-mediated medical encounters.” In Providing health care in the context of language barriers. International perspectives, ed. by Elizabeth Jacobs, and Lisa Diamond, 35–55. Bristol UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, David. et al.
2003 “An exploratory study of language interpretation services provided by videoconferencing.” Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 9: 51–56. Retrieved from: [URL].Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam
1967 “Some function of gaze direction in social interaction.” Acta Psychologica 26: 22–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Nataly
2008 Telephone interpreting: A comprehensive guide to the profession. Victoria, BC: Trafford Publishing.Google Scholar
van der Kleij, Simone
2015 Interaction in Dutch asylum interviews. A corpus study of interpreter-mediated institutional discourse. Utrecht: Lot.Google Scholar
Ko, Leong
2006 “The need for long-term empirical studies in remote interpreting research: A case study of telephone interpreting.” In Taking stock: Research and Methodology in Community Interpreting, ed. by Erik Hertog, and Bart van der Veer, 325–338.Antwerpen: Linguistica Antverpiensia 5.Google Scholar
Korak, Christina
2010 Remote Interpreting via Skype. Anwendungsmöglichkeiten von VoIPSoftware im Bereich Community Interpreting – Communicate everywhere? Berlin: Frank & Timme.Google Scholar
Krystallidou, Demi
2014 “Gaze and body orientation as an apparatus for patient inclusion into/exclusion from a patient-centred framework of communication.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer. 8 (3): 399–417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “Investigating the interpreter’s role(s). The A.R.T. framework.” Interpreting 18(2): 172–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuo, David and Mark J Fagan
1999 “Satisfaction with methods of Spanish interpretation in an ambulatory care clinic.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 14: 547–550. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kurz, Ingrid
1996 “Interpreting: Sound vs. sound and picture.” The Jerome Quarterly 12(1): 5–14.Google Scholar
Lee, Jieun
2007 “Telephone Interpreting – seen from the interpreter’s perspective.” Interpreting 9(2): 231–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Linda J. et al.
2002 “Effect of Spanish interpretation method on patient satisfaction in an urban walk-in clinic.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 17(8): 641–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leemann Price, Erika et al.
2012 “Interpreter perspectives of in-person, telephonic, and videoconferencing medical.” In Patient Education and Counseling 87: 226–232.Google Scholar
Locatis, Craig et al.
2010 “Comparing In-Person, Video, and Telephonic Medical Interpretation.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 25(4): 345–350. Retrieved from [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “Video Medical Interpretation over 3G Cellular Networks: A Feasibility Study.” Telemedicine and e-Health 17(10): 809–813. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mason, Ian
2012 “Gaze, positioning and identity in interpreter-mediated dialogues.” In Coordinating participation in dialogue interpreting, ed. by Claudia Baraldi, and Laura Gavioli, 177–200. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merlini, Raffaela, and Roberta Favaron
2007 “Examining the voice of interpreting in speech pathology.” In Healthcare Interpreting, ed. by Franz Pöchhacker, and Miriam Shlesinger, 101–137. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Metzger, Melanie
1999 Sign Language Interpreting: Deconstructing the myth of neutrality. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Moser-Mercer, Barbara
2005a “Remote interpreting: issues of multi-sensory integration in a multilingual task.” Meta 50(2): 727–738. Retrieved from [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005b “Remote interpreting: The crucial role of presence.” Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliqué 81: 73–97.Google Scholar
Mouzourakis, Panagiotis
2006 “Remote interpreting: a technical perspective on recent experiments.” Interpreting 8(1): 45–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Napier, Jemina
2004 “Interpreting Omissions: A new perspective.” Interpreting 6(2): 117–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nápoles, Anna. M. et al.
2010 “Clinician ratings of interpreter mediated visits in underserved primary care settings with ad hoc, in-person professional, and video conferencing modes.” Journal of health care for the poor and underserved 21: 301–317. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Oviatt, Sharon and Philip R. Cohen
1992 “Spoken language in interpreted telephone dialogues.” Computer Speech and Language 6: 277–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paras, Melinda. et al.
2002 Videoconferencing medical interpretation. The results of clinical trials. Oakland: Health Access Foundation.Google Scholar
Pöchhacker, Franz
2004 Introducing Interpreting Studies. London/New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Research and methodology in healthcare interpreting.” In Taking stock: Research and Methodology in Community Interpreting [Linguistica Antverpiensia 5], ed. by Erik Hertog, and Bart van der Veer, 135–159.Google Scholar
Pöchhacker, Franz, and Schlesinger Miriam
(eds) 2007 Healthcare Interpreting: Discourse and Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pöchhacker, Franz
2014 “Remote possibilities: training simultaneous video interpreting for Austrian Hospitals.” In Investigations in healthcare interpreting, ed. by Brenda Nicodemus, and Melanie Metzger, 302–325. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Brett A.
2007 “A data driven analysis of telephone interpreting.” In The Critical Link 4. Professionalisation of interpreting in the community, ed. by Cecilia Wadensjö, Birgitta Englund Dimitrova, and Anna-Lena Nilsson, 65–76. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Roy, Cynthia
2000 Interpreting as a discourse process. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Saint-Louis, Loretta et al.
2003 Testing new technologies in medical interpreting. Somerville, Massachusetts: Cambridge Health Alliance. Retrieved from [URL].Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey et al.
1974 “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation.” Language 50: 696–736. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1982 “Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences.” In Analyzing discourse: text and talk (Georgetown university round table on language and linguistics 1981), ed. by Deborah Tannen, 71–93. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Shlesinger, Miriam
2007 “Quality in simultaneous interpreting.” In Conference Interpreting: Current trends in research, ed. by Yves Gambier, Daniel Gile, and Christopher Taylor, 123–131. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1994 Approaches to discourse. Cambridge, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stowe, S., and Harding, S.
2010 “Technology applied to geriatric medicine. Telecare, telehealth and telemedicine.” European Geriatric Medicine 1:193–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tebble, Helen
1993 “A discourse model for dialogue interpreting in Australian Institute of Interpreters and Translators (AUSIT).” In Proceedings of the First Practitioners’ Seminar of AUSIT, November 1992, 1–26. Canberra: NAATI.Google Scholar
1999 “The tenor of consultant physicians. Implications for medical interpreting.” The Translator 5: 179–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Interpreting of interfering?.” In Coordinating participation in dialogue interpreting, ed. by Claudia Baraldi, and Laura Gavioli, 23–44. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tommola, Jorma, and Johan Lindholm
1995 “Experimental Research on Interpreting: Which Dependent Variable?.” In Topics in Interpreting Research, ed. by Jorma Tommola, 121–133. Turku: University of Turku Press.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun
1997 Discourse as social interaction [Discourse Studies: a multidisciplinary introduction II]. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Verrept, Hans
2011 “Intercultural mediation through the internet in Belgian hospitals.” 4th International Conference on Public Service Interpreting and Translation, 13–15 April 2011.Google Scholar
Verrept, Hans, and Isabelle Coune
2017 Guide for intercultural mediation in health care. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Wadensjö, Cecilia
1998 Interpreting as Interaction. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
1999 “Telephone Interpreting & the Synchronization of Talk in Social Interaction.” The Translator 5(2): 247–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Jihong
2017 “ ‘Telephone interpreting should be used only as a last resort.’ Interpreters perceptions of the suitability, remuneration and quality of telephone interpreting.” Perspectives: Studies in Translation Theory and Practice. Retrieved from: DOI logo.Google Scholar
2018 “ ‘I only interpret the content and ask practical questions when necessary’. Interpreters perceptions of their explicit coordination and personal pronoun choice in telephone interpreting.” Perspectives: Studies in Translation Theory and Practice. Retrieved from DOI logo.Google Scholar
Whittaker, Steve, and Brid O’Connaill
1997 “The role of Vision in Face-to-Face and Mediated communication.” In Video-mediated communication, ed. by Kathleen E. Finn et al. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.Google Scholar
Xudong, Deng
2009 “Listener response.” In The Pragmatics of interaction, ed. by Sigurd D’hondt, Jan-Ola Östman, and Jef Verschueren, 104–124. John Benjamins: Amsterdam/Philadelphia. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Young, Richard, and Lee, Jina
2004 “Identifying units in interaction: Reactive tokens in Korean and English conversations”. Journal of sociolinguistics. Special issue: Acquisition of sociolinguistic competence, 8(3): 380–407
https://doi.org/
. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Farag, Rahaf & Bernd Meyer
2024. Coordination in telephone-based remote interpreting. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 26:1 ► pp. 80 ff. DOI logo
Klammer, Martina & Franz Pöchhacker
2021. Video remote interpreting in clinical communication: A multimodal analysis. Patient Education and Counseling 104:12 ► pp. 2867 ff. DOI logo
Lázaro Gutiérrez, Raquel & Cristina Álvaro Aranda
2023. Introduction to New Trends in Healthcare Interpreting Studies. In New Trends in Healthcare Interpreting Studies [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Salaets, Heidi & Katalin Balogh
2023. Are interpreters and interpreting technology ready for the post-Covid era?. In Introducing New Hypertexts on Interpreting (Studies) [Benjamins Translation Library, 160], ► pp. 254 ff. DOI logo
Singureanu, Diana, Graham Hieke, Joanna Gough & Sabine Braun
2023. Chapter 4. ‘I am his extension in the courtroom’. In Interpreting Technologies – Current and Future Trends [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 37], ► pp. 72 ff. DOI logo
Vranjes, Jelena & Bart Defrancq
2023. To repair or not to repair? Repairs and risk taking in video remote interpreting. Perspectives ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.