Chapter published in:
Linking up with Video: Perspectives on interpreting practice and research
Edited by Heidi Salaets and Geert Brône
[Benjamins Translation Library 149] 2020
► pp. 181–202

Going video: Understanding interpreter-mediated clinical communication through the video lens

| KU Leuven
Most of the research on dialogue interpreting has been conducted by taking only verbal interaction into account. Although the existing research has managed to shed some light on the complexity of interpreter-mediated interaction, there is still a lot to be unravelled by adopting a multimodal stance and including non-verbal cues in the analysis of verbal interaction. This study builds on the findings of recent research by Davitti (2013); Davitti & Pasquandrea (2017); Krystallidou (2013, 2014, 2016); Pasquandrea (2011, 2012). In this study, I draw on data taken from a corpus of authentic video-recorded interpreter-mediated consultations at a large urban hospital in Belgium. By applying multimodal analysis to data and comparing it to analysis based on transcripts alone, I highlight a set of interactional dynamics that touch upon new aspects of the complexity of interpreter-mediated interaction and which a transcript-based analysis alone would have failed to capture. It will be shown that participants’ gaze, gestures and body orientation, along with verbal interaction, are used by the interpreter as semiotic resources that do affect the doctor’s and the patient’s participation in interaction. However, the weight the interpreter seems to attach to the primary participants’ semiotic resources seems to be subject to the participation status of each participant.
Published online: 13 January 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.149.08kry
References

References

Apfelbaum, Birgit
1998 “Instruktionsdiskurse mit Dolmetscher-beteiligung: Aspekte der Turnkonstruktion und Turnzuweisung.” In Neuere Entwicklungen in der Gesprächsforschung, ed. by Alexander Brock, and Martin Hartung , 11–36. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Argyle, Michael, and Mark Cook
1976 Gaze and Mutual Gaze. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baraldi, Claudio and Laura Gavioli
2012 Coordinating Participation in Dialogue Interpreting. [Benjamins Translation Library 102]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butow, Phyllis N., Elizabeth A. Lobb,, Michael Jefford, David Goldstein, Maurice Eisenbruch, Araf Girgis, Madeleine King, Ming Sze, Lynley Aldridge , and Penelope Schofield 2012 “A bridge between cultures: Interpreters’ perspectives of consultations with migrant oncology patients.” Supportive Care in Cancer 20 (2): 235–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Brad
(2002) “A model for the construction of conversational common ground in interpreted discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1273–1300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davitti, Elena
2013 “Dialogue interpreting as intercultural mediation: Interpreters' use of upgrading moves in parent-teacher meetings.” Interpreting 15 (2): 168–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davitti, Elena, and Sergio Pasquandrea
2017 “Embodied participation: What multimodal analysis can tell us about interpreter-mediated encounters in pedagogical settings.” Journal of Pragmatics 107: 105–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981 Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1981 Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Inghilleri, Moira
2003 “Habitus, field and discourse: Interpreting as a socially situated activity.” Target 15 (2): 243–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krystallidou, Dimitra K.
2013 The Interpreter’s Role in Medical Consultations as Perceived and as Interactionally Negotiated: A Study of a Flemish Hospital Setting, Using Interview Data and Video Recorded Interactions, PhD thesis, Ghent University.Google Scholar
Krystallidou, Demi
2014 “Gaze and body orientation as an apparatus for patient inclusion into/exclusion from a patient-centred framework of communication.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 8 (3): 399–417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 “Investigating the interpreter’s role(s): The A.R.T. framework.” Interpreting 18 (2): 172–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, Shuangyu
2015 “Nine types of turn-taking in interpreter-mediated GP consultations.” Applied Linguistics Review 6 (1): 73–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Ian
2012 “Gaze, positioning and identity in interpreter-mediated dialogues.” In Coordinating Participation in Dialogue Interpreting, ed. by Claudio Braldi, and Laura Gavioli , 177–200. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Metzger, Melanie, and Cynthia Roy
2011 “The first three years of a three-year grant: When research plan doesn't go as planned.” In Advances in Interpreting Research, ed. by Brenda Nicodemus, and Laurie Swabey, 59–84. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pasquandrea, Sergio
2011 “Managing multiple actions through multimodality: Doctors' involvement in interpreter-mediated interactions.” Language in Society, 40 (4): 455–481. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Co-constructing dyadic sequences in healthcare interpreting: A multimodal account.” New Voices in Translation Studies, 8 (1): 132–157.Google Scholar
Pöchhacker, Franz
2010 “The role of research in interpreter education.” The International Journal for Translation & Interpreting Research 2 (1): 1–10.Google Scholar
Poyatos, Fernando
1997 “The reality of multichannel verbal-nonverbal communication in simultaneous and consecutive interpretation.” In Nonverbal communication and translation: New perspectives and challenges in literature, interpretation and the media, ed. by Fernando Poyatos, 249–281. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Jeffrey D. 1998 “Getting down to business: Talk, gaze and body orientation during opening of doctor-patient consultations.” Human Communication Research 25 (1): 98–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skelton, John
2011 “Clinical communication as a creative art: An alternative way forward.” Medical Education 45 (3): 212–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swinglehurst, Deborah, Celia Roberts, Shuangyu Li , Orest Weber, and Pascal Singy
2014 “Beyond the ‘dyad’: A qualitative re-evaluation of the changing clinical consultation.” BMJ Open 4 (9). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wadensjö, Cecilia
1998 Interpreting as Interaction. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2001 “Interpreting in crisis: The interpreter's position in therapeutic encounters.” In Triadic Exchanges: Studies in Dialogue Interpreting, ed. by Ian Mason , 71–85. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Crezee, Ineke H.M., Johanna Hautekiet & Lidia Rura
2021.  In Introduction to Healthcare for Russian-speaking Interpreters and Translators, Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.