Cover not available
Part of
The Complexity of Social-Cultural Emergence: Biosemiotics, semiotics and translation studies
Edited by Kobus Marais, Reine Meylaerts and Maud Gonne
[Benjamins Translation Library 164] 2024
► pp. 1–11

Introduction

| University of Liege
| KU Leuven
| University of the Free State
Article outline
  • In search of the patterns that connect
  • Connecting mind and matter
  • From the biosphere to the tradosphere
  • The patterns that connect biology, semiotics, and translation studies: Expanded definitions of translation
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 3 May 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.164.00gon
References (22)
References
Bateson, G. 2002. Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Cronin, M. 2017. Eco-Translation: Translation and Ecology in the Age of the Anthropocene. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020. Eco-Translation. Future Earth week. Ireland research for global sustainability. YouTube video. [URL]Google Scholar
2020. “Translation and Posthumanism.” In The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Ethics, edited by K. Koskinen and N. K. Pokorn. Routledge. [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deacon, T. W. 2013. Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter. WW Norman and Company.Google Scholar
Floridi, L. 2014. The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gonne, M. 2023. “Approaches to the Sociology of Knowledge.” In Routledge Handbook of Translation Theory and Concepts, edited by K. Marais and R. Meylaerts. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmeyer, J. 2008. Biosemiotics: An Examination into the Signs of Life and the Life of Signs. University of Scranton Press.Google Scholar
Kauffman, S. 2012. From Physics to Semiotics. In Biosemiotic Gatherings, edited by S. Rattasepp and T. Bennet, 30–46. University of Tartu Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kull, K., and P. Torop. 2003. Biotranslation: Translation between Umwelten. In Translation Translation, edited by S. Petrilli, 313–28. Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to the Actor-Network Theory. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lotman, J. 1990. The Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Translated by A. Shukman. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Macé, M. 2019. Nos cabanes. Verdier.Google Scholar
Marais, K. 2019. A (Bio)Semiotic Theory of Translation: The Emergence of Social-Cultural Reality. Routledge.Google Scholar
Maran, T. 2020. Ecosemiotics. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semenenko, A. 2012. The Texture of Culture: An Introduction to Yuri Lotman’s Semiotic Theory. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serres, M. 1972. Hermès II. L’Interférence. Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
(2014). L’information et la Pensee. Keynote Address presented at the Philosophy After Nature Conference. Joint Annual Conference of the Society for European Philosophy and Forum for European Philosophy. Utrecht, The Netherlands. [URL]Google Scholar
2022. Hermes II, Interference [Interference]. Unpublished. Translated by R. Burks. [URL]Google Scholar
Soler, L. 2007. “Popper et Kuhn sur les choix inter-théoriques [Popper and Kuhn on Inter-Theoretical Choices].” Philosophia Scientiæ 11–1: 99–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steiner, P. 1984. Russian Formalism: A Metapoetics. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar