Part of
Translation Studies: An Interdiscipline: Selected papers from the Translation Studies Congress, Vienna, 1992Edited by Mary Snell-Hornby, Franz Pöchhacker and Klaus Kaindl
[Benjamins Translation Library 2] 1994
► pp. 149–
Edited by Mary Snell-Hornby, Franz Pöchhacker and Klaus Kaindl
[Benjamins Translation Library 2] 1994
► pp. 149–
Opening up in interpretation studies
Cited by
Cited by 36 other publications
Al-Fedaghi, Sabah
2015. On Collaboration in Software: Annotation vs. Flow-Based Diagrams. Journal of Software 10:11 ► pp. 1327 ff. 
Al-Fedaghi, Sabah & Mohamad Almutairy
2015. 2015 IEEE/ACIS 16th International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD), ► pp. 1 ff.
Barghout, Alma, Lucía Ruiz Rosendo & Mónica Varela García
2015. The influence of speed on omissions in simultaneous interpretation. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation 61:3 ► pp. 305 ff.
Bendazzoli, Claudio
2017. Duflou, 2016, Be(com)ing a conference interpreter: An ethnography of EU interpreters as a professional community. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 19:2 ► pp. 294 ff.
Dam, Helle V.
1998. Lexical Similarity vs Lexical Dissimilarity in Consecutive Interpreting. The Translator 4:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
Fryer, Louise
2020. Audio describing Ocean’s Eleven scene 12 out of context: decision points in AD drafting. Perspectives 28:6 ► pp. 896 ff.
Gile, Daniel
2000. The History of Research into Conference Interpreting. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 12:2 ► pp. 297 ff.
Giustini, Deborah
2019. “It’s not just words, it’s the feeling, the passion, the emotions”: an ethnography of affect in interpreters’ practices in contemporary Japan. Asian Anthropology 18:3 ► pp. 186 ff.
Gran, Laura & Maurizio Viezzi
1995. Development of Research Work at SSLM, Trieste. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 7:1 ► pp. 107 ff.
Han, Chao
2018. Mixed-methods research in interpreting studies. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 20:2 ► pp. 155 ff.
Han, Chao
2022. Interpreting testing and assessment: A state-of-the-art review. Language Testing 39:1 ► pp. 30 ff.
Heyerick, Isabelle
2020. Chapter 5. The importance of video recordings in signed language interpreting research. In Linking up with Video [Benjamins Translation Library, 149], ► pp. 127 ff.
Hoyte-West, Antony
2023. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching: The Case of the Southern Caribbean - Book Review. English Studies at NBU 9:2 ► pp. 313 ff.
Kozin, Alexander V.
2018. From Consecutive Interpreting to ‘Translation-in-Talk’. In Consecutive Interpreting, ► pp. 107 ff.
Kruger, Haidee, Agnieszka Chmiel, Dorothy Kenny, Daryl R. Hague, Michail Sachinis & Andrew Jameson
2010. Book Reviews. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 4:2 ► pp. 283 ff.
Napier, Jemina
2021. Signing Deaf Communities and Language Brokering. In Sign Language Brokering in Deaf-Hearing Families, ► pp. 1 ff.
Ouyang, Lingwei, Qianxi Lv & Junying Liang
2021. Coh-Metrix Model-Based Automatic Assessment of Interpreting Quality. In Testing and Assessment of Interpreting [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 179 ff.
Pöchhacker, Franz
Pöchhacker, Franz
2005. From Operation to Action: Process-Orientation in Interpreting Studies. Meta 50:2 ► pp. 682 ff.
Pöchhacker, Franz
2010. Interpreting Studies. In Handbook of Translation Studies [Handbook of Translation Studies, 1], ► pp. 158 ff.
Pöchhacker, Franz
2023. Pioneering interpreting studies. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 25:2 ► pp. 159 ff.
Pöchhacker, Franz & Minhua Liu
2021. Interpreting research in print. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 23:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Ren, Wen
2020. The evolution of interpreters’ perception and application of (codes of) ethics in China since 1949: a sociological and historical perspective. The Translator 26:3 ► pp. 274 ff.
Schjoldager, Anne
1995. Interpreting Research and the ‘Manipulation School’ of Translation Studies1. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 7:1 ► pp. 29 ff.
Schjoldager, Anne
2011. Efforts and models in interpreting and translation research. A tribute to Daniel Gile. Perspectives 19:4 ► pp. 367 ff.
Sibul, Karin
2023. Responsibility and Ethics in Simultaneous Interpretation of Films. Vertimo studijos 16 ► pp. 145 ff.
Snell-Hornby, Mary
2010. The turns of Translation Studies. In Handbook of Translation Studies [Handbook of Translation Studies, 1], ► pp. 366 ff.
Snell-Hornby, Mary
2018. Chapter 2.7. Turns. In A History of Modern Translation Knowledge [Benjamins Translation Library, 142], ► pp. 143 ff.
Tang, Fang & Shuzhen Jiang
2022. Four-word lexical bundles in Chinese-English consecutive interpreting—A comparative study between professionals and trainees. Frontiers in Psychology 13
Togato, Giulia, Natalia Paredes, Pedro Macizo & Teresa Bajo
2015. Syntactic Processing in Professional Interpreters: Understanding Ambiguous Sentences in Reading and Translation. Applied Linguistics ► pp. amv054 ff.
Torres-Simón, Esther & Anthony Pym
2016. The professional backgrounds of translation scholars. Report on a survey. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 28:1 ► pp. 110 ff.
Xu, Ziyun & Éric Archambault
2015. Chinese interpreting studies: structural determinants of MA students’ career choices. Scientometrics 105:2 ► pp. 1041 ff.
Xu, Ziyun & Leonid B. Pekelis
2015. A survey of Chinese interpreting studies: who influences who …and why?. PeerJ Computer Science 1 ► pp. e14 ff.
Yi, Ran
2023. Book Review: Fabrizio Gallai, Relevance Theory in Translation and Interpreting: A Cognitive-Pragmatic Approach. Discourse Studies 25:6 ► pp. 850 ff.
Zhu, Xuelian & Vahid Aryadoust
2023. A scientometric review of research in Translation Studies in the twenty-first century. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 35:2 ► pp. 157 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.