Relevance as a factor in subtitling reductions

Cited by 10 other publications

Artegiani, Irene & Dionysios Kapsaskis

2014. Template files: asset or anathema? A qualitative analysis of the subtitles ofThe Sopranos. Perspectives 22:3 ► pp. 419 ff.

Desilla, Louisa

2014. Reading between the lines, seeing beyond the images: an empirical study on the comprehension of implicit film dialogue meaning across cultures. The Translator 20:2 ► pp. 194 ff.

Díaz-Cintas, Jorge

2020.  In The Palgrave Handbook of Audiovisual Translation and Media Accessibility, ► pp. 149 ff.

Grigaravičiūte, Ieva & Henrik Gottlieb

1999. Danish voices, Lithuanian voice‐over. the mechanics of non‐synchronous translation. Perspectives 7:1 ► pp. 41 ff.

Jing, Yi

2021. Audiovisual translation as orchestration of multimodal synergies. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 33:1 ► pp. 26 ff.

Mubenga, Kajingulu Somwe

2010. Investigating norms in interlingual subtitling: a systemic functional perspective. Perspectives 18:4 ► pp. 251 ff.

Neves, Josélia

2009.  In Audiovisual Translation, ► pp. 151 ff.

Schröter, Thorsten

2003. Quantity and quality in screen translation. Perspectives 11:2 ► pp. 105 ff.

Szarkowska, Agnieszka, Jorge Díaz Cintas & Olivia Gerber-Morón

2020. Quality is in the eye of the stakeholders: what do professional subtitlers and viewers think about subtitling?. Universal Access in the Information Society

Zilberdik, Nan Jacques

2004. Relay translation in subtitling. Perspectives 12:1 ► pp. 31 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.