Y a-t-il place pour une socio-traductologie?

Yves Gambier

Translation studies has become an (inter)discipline but under which conditions? This paper deals with the necessity for the creation and development of socio-translation studies. Three main elements are presented: the need for the self-analysis of scholars, the need for a historiography of the field, and the need for an analysis of institutions and publications which shape and identify the discipline.

Published online: 25 October 2007
https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.74.15gam

Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given

2014. De quelques effets de l’internationalisation et de la technologisation. Target 26:2 ► pp. 259 ff.

Buzelin, Hélène

2018. In A History of Modern Translation Knowledge [Benjamins Translation Library, 142], ► pp. 337 ff.

Castro, Nayelli

2012. La traduction de la phénoménologie husserlienne en espagnol : une perspective socio-traductologique. TTR 24:1 ► pp. 45 ff.

D’hulst, Lieven & Yves Gambier

2018. In A History of Modern Translation Knowledge [Benjamins Translation Library, 142], ► pp. 2 ff.

Gambier, Yves & Luc van Doorslaer

2016. In Border Crossings [Benjamins Translation Library, 126], ► pp. 1 ff.

van Doorslaer, Luc & Yves Gambier

2015. Measuring relationships in Translation Studies. On affiliations and keyword frequencies in the Translation Studies Bibliography. Perspectives 23:2 ► pp. 305 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 january 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.