Article published in:The Critical Link 5: Quality in interpreting – a shared responsibility
Edited by Sandra Hale, Uldis Ozolins and Ludmila Stern
[Benjamins Translation Library 87] 2009
► pp. 119–134
8. Interpreting for the record
A case study of asylum review hearings
This paper addresses a specific aspect of interpreting in Austrian asylum review hearings, i.e., the interpreter’s role as a co-producer of the written record. The interpreter-mediated encounter is viewed as a joint, co-constructed activity, with responsibility for its content, progression and outcome shared by all the interacting parties. This includes the production of the written record of the interview, which is typed by a recording clerk under the supervision of the adjudicator. The discourse-based analysis of fourteen hearings with English-speaking asylum seekers from African countries shows that most interpreters tend to adjust to a striking degree to the needs of record production. This perceived need to interpret “for the record” not only entails an increased cognitive task load but also a significant degree of shared responsibility on the interpreter’s part for the legally relevant manifestation of the interview.
Published online: 10 December 2009
Cited by 9 other publications
Defrancq, Bart & Sofie Verliefde
Englund Dimitrova, Birgitta & Elisabet Tiselius
Jiménez-Ivars, Amparo & Ruth León-Pinilla
K. Pokorn, Nike & Jaka Čibej
Kent, Stephanie Jo & Jeffrey A. Kappen
Mellinger, Christopher D.
Pokorn, Nike K. & Jaka Čibej
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.