Article published in:
Non-Nuclear Cases
Edited by Nicole Delbecque, Karen Lahousse and Willy Van Langendonck
[Case and Grammatical Relations Across Languages 6] 2014
► pp. 67–94

Connate roles in Nyulnyul

non-nuclear grammatical relations within the core

This paper is concerned with the distinction between nuclear and non-nuclear grammatical relations in Nyulnyul, an effectively extinct language of Dampier Land, Western Australia. Drawing on research within Semiotic Grammar, it is proposed that a fundamental distinction needs to be drawn between experiential relations (Actor, Undergoer, Agent, and the like) and logical relations (circumstantial or adverbial elements). Although it is tempting to correlate nuclear and non-nuclear relations with the experiential-logical contrast, the relations are so unalike that it is misleading to place them on a single hierarchy. It is suggested instead that experiential grammatical relations can be meaningfully divided into nuclear and core types, and that this distinction provides a layered model for the clause as an experiential unit.
Published online: 17 December 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/cagral.6.03gre
References
Bowern, Claire L
2012 A grammar of Bardi. (Mouton Grammar Library.) Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin
1996 “Functional dimensions of the dative in English.” In The dative. Volume 1: Descriptive studies, ed. by William Van Belle, and Willy Van Langendonck, 289-338. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon C
1997 The theory of functional grammar. Part 1: The structure of the clause. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Goddard, C
1982 “Case systems and case marking in Australian languages: a new interpretation.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 2: 167-196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E
1995 Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haas, William
1954 “On defining linguistic units.” Transactions of the Philological Society: 54-84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1987 “Function and structure in linguistic descriptions.” In Functionalism in linguistics, ed. by Rene Dirven, and V. Fried, 333-355. Amsterdam /Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K
1985 An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hosokawa, Komei
1991 The Yawuru language of West Kimberley: a meaning-based description. PhD thesis, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W
1990 Concept, image, and symbol: the cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin /New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1999 Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Peter H
1981 Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McGregor, William B
1985 “Body parts in Kuniyanti clause grammar.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 5: 209-232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990 A functional grammar of Gooniyandi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994 Warrwa. München/Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
1996a “Arguments for the category of verb phrase.” Functions of Language 3: 1-30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996b “Attribution and identification in Gooniyandi.” In Meaning and form: systemic functional interpretations. Meaning and choice in language: studies for Michael Halliday, ed. by Margaret Berry, Christopher Butler, Robin Fawcett, and Guowen Huang, 395-430. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
1996c Nyulnyul. München/Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
1997 Semiotic grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1998a “The oblique alternation in Gooniyandi.” Leuvense Bijdragen 87: 535-571.Google Scholar
1998b “‘Optional’ ergative marking in Gooniyandi revisited: implications to the theory of marking.” Leuvense Bijdragen 87: 491-534.Google Scholar
1999a “External possession constructions in Nyulnyulan languages.” In External possession, ed. by Doris L. Payne, and Immanuel Barshi, 429-448. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999b “The medio-active construction in Nyulnyulan languages.” Studies in Language 23: 531-567. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 “Reflexive and reciprocal constructions in Nyulnyulan languages.” In Reciprocals: form and function, ed. by Zygmunt Frajzyngier, and Traci S. Curl, 85-122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 “Non-verbal predicative possession in Nyulnyulan languages.” In Forty years on: Ken Hale and Australian languages, ed. by Jane Simpson, David Nash, Mary Laughren, Peter Austin, and Barry Alpher, 337-352. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
2002a “Ergative and accusative patterning in Warrwa.” In The nominative & accusative and their counterparts, ed. by Kristin Davidse, and Béatrice Lamiroy, 285-317. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002b Verb classification in Australian languages. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003a “A fundamental misconception of modern linguistics.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 35: 39-64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003b “Language shift among the Nyulnyul of Dampier Land.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 35: 115-159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003c “The nothing that is, the zero that isn’t.” Studia Linguistica 57: 75-119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 The languages of the Kimberley, Western Australia. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
2006a “Focal and optional ergative marking in Warrwa (Kimberley, Western Australia).” Lingua 116: 393-423. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
“Ergative marking of intransitive subjects in Warrwa” Australian Journal of Linguistics 27 (2): 201–229. Crossref
2012 The Nyulnyul language of Dampier Land, Western Australia. Volume 1: Grammar . Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, Christopher D
1975 Bardi verb morphology. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
1979 “Some aspects of the Bardi language: a non-technical description.” In Aborigines of the West: their past and their present, ed. by Ronald M. Berndt, and Catherine H. Berndt, 197-213. Perth: University of Western Australia Press.Google Scholar
Nekes, Hermann
1938 “The pronoun in Nyol-Nyol (Nyul-Nyul) and related dialects.” In Studies in Australian linguistics, ed. by Adolphus P. Elkin, 139-163. Sydney: The Australian National Research Council.Google Scholar
Nekes, Hermann, and Ernest A. Worms
1953 Australian languages. Fribourg: Anthropos Institut.Google Scholar
2006 Australian languages. Edited by William B. McGregor. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris L., and Immanuel Barshi
1999 “External possession: what, where, how, and why.” In External possession, ed. by Doris L. Payne, and Immanuel Barshi, 3-29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Thomas E
1997 Describing morphosyntax: a guide for field linguists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2006 Exploring language structure: a student’s guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rumsey, Alan L
1982 An intra-sentence grammar of Ungarinjin, North-western Australia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Stokes, Bronwyn
1982 A description of Nyigina: a language of the West Kimberley, Western Australia. PhD thesis, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976 “Hierarchy of features and ergativity.” In Grammatical categories in Australian languages, ed. by Robert M.W Dixon, 112-171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D
1993 “A synopsis of role and reference grammar.” In Advances in role and reference grammar, ed. by Robert D. Van Valin, 1-164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whaley, Lindsay J
1997 Introduction to typology. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M
1993 “Heads, bases, and functors.” In Heads in grammatical theory, ed. by Greville G. Corbett, Norman M. Fraser, and Scott McGlashan, 292-315. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar