Article published in:
Non-Nuclear CasesEdited by Nicole Delbecque, Karen Lahousse and Willy Van Langendonck
[Case and Grammatical Relations Across Languages 6] 2014
► pp. 95–126
German two-way prepositions and related phenomena
This paper examines German two-way prepositions governing both the accusative and the dative. It shows that sticking to concepts such as static location (DAT) vs change of location, movement or direction (ACC), as is still done in traditional grammars, falls short of being descriptively and explanatorily adequate. Although Paul’s (1920) dichotomy between emerging relationship (ACC) and existing relationship (DAT) constituted a major, though hardly noted improvement, it remains counterintuitive in that it characterizes ablative and perlative datives as expressing existing relationships. Shifting to a dichotomy between emerging relationship (ACC) and non-emerging relationship (DAT) permits to characterize the positively defined accusative as the marked option and the negatively defined dative as the default option, generalizing over all dative subclasses.
Published online: 17 December 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/cagral.6.04dra
https://doi.org/10.1075/cagral.6.04dra
A. Secondary literature
A. Secondary literature
Abraham, Werner
Draye, Luk
Duden
Karg-Gasterstädt, Elisabeth, and Theodor Frings
Langacker, Ronald W.
Lakoff, George
Leys, Odo
Mitzka, Walther
Paul, Hermann
Serra-Borneto, Carlo
1997 “Two-way Prepositions in German: Image and Constraints.” In Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction of Meaning, ed. by Marjolein Verspoor, Kee Dong Lee, and Eve Sweetser, 187-204. Proceedings of the Bi-annual ICLA Meeting in Albuquerque, July 1995. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. 

Smith, Michael B.
Zifonun, Gisela, Ludger Hoffman, and Bruno Strecker
B. Corpus Material
Fontane, Theodor
Schreiber, Marion