Chapter 1. Applying constructional concepts to Romance languages
References
Aarts, B
(
1992)
Small clauses in English: The non-verbal types. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Allen, J.H., & Greenough, J.B
(
1980)
Allen and Greenough’s new Latin grammar. New Rochelle, NY: Caratzas Brothers, Publishers. [Revision of the 1883 edition.]
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Báez Montero, I.C
(
1988)
La construcción con predicativo del complemento directo en castellano medieval. Vigo: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barðdal, J
(
2004)
The semantics of the impersonal construction in Icelandic, German and Faroese: Beyond thematic roles. In
W. Abraham (Ed.),
Focus on Germanic typology [
Studia Typologica, 6] (pp. 101–130). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barðdal, J
(
2013)
Construction-based historical-comparative reconstruction. In
T. Hoffmann, &
G. Trousdale (Eds.),
The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 438–457). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barðdal, J., & Eythórsson, Th
(
2012)
Reconstructing syntax: Construction Grammar and the comparative method. In
H.C. Boas, &
I. Sag (Eds.),
Sign-based Construction Grammar (pp. 257–308). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bassols de Climent, M
(
1945)
Sintaxis histórica de la lengua latina. Barcelona: CSIC.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bergen, B.K., & Plauché, M
(
2001)
Voilà voilà: Extensions of deictic constructions in French. In
A. Cienki,
B. Luka, &
M. Smith (Eds.),
Conceptual and discourse factors in linguistic structure (pp. 238–249). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bergen, B.K., & Plauché, M
(
2005)
The convergent evolution of radial constructions: French and English deictics and existentials.
Cognitive Linguistics, 16(1), 1–42.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bergs, A., & Diewald, G
(Eds.) (
2008)
Constructions and language change. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boas, H.C
(
2003)
A constructional approach to resultatives. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boas, H.C
(
2005)
Determining the productivity of resultative constructions: A reply to Goldberg & Jackendoff.
Language, 81(2), 448–464.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boas, H.C
(
2006)
A frame-semantic approach to identifying syntactically relevant elements of meaning. In
P. Steiner,
H.C. Boas, &
S. Schierholz (Eds.),
Contrastive studies and valency. Studies in honor of Hans Ulrich Boas (pp. 119–149). Frankfurt & New York: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boas, H.C
(
2011)
Coercion and leaking argument structure in Construction Grammar.
Linguistics, 49(6), 1271–1303.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolkestein, A.M
(
1976)
A.c.i.- and ut-clauses with verba dicendi in Latin.
Glotta, 54, 263–291.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borkin, A
(
1973)
To be or not to be
.
Proceedings of the 9th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society
, 44–56.
Borkin, A
(
1984)
Problems in form and function. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bouveret, M., & Legallois, D
Bybee, J.L
(
2006)
From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition.
Language, 82(4), 711–733.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, J.L., & Eddington, D
(
2006)
A usage-based approach to Spanish verbs of ‘becoming’.
Language, 82(2), 323–355.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, J.L., & Hopper, P.J
Cano Aguilar, R
(
1988)
El español a través de los tiempos. Madrid: Arco Libros S.A.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cardinaletti, A., & Guasti, M.T
(Eds.) (
1995)
Small clauses. Syntax and Semantics, 28. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Contreras, H
(
1987)
Small clauses in English and Spanish.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5(2), 225–243.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, W
(
2000)
Explaining language change. Harlow: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, W
(
2001)
Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C
Croft, W., & Cruse, D.A
(
2004)
Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Knop, S., Mollica, F., & Kuhn, J
(
2013)
Konstruktionsgrammatik und Romanische Sprachen. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Deulofeu, J., & Debaisioux, J.M
Demonte, V., & Masullo, P
(
1999)
La predicación: Los complementos predicativos. In
I. Bosque, &
V. Demonte (Dirs.),
Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 2461–2523). Madrid: Espasa.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dik, S.C
(
1978)
Functional grammar. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ernout, A., & Thomas, F
(
1972)
Syntaxe latine. Paris: Klincksieck.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferraresi G., & Goldbach, M
(
2003)
Some reflections on inertia: Infinitive complements in Latin. In
B. Baumgarten,
C. Böttger,
M. Motz, &
M.J. Probst (Eds.),
Übersetzen, interkulturelle Kommunikation, Spracherwerb und Sprachvermittlung – das Leben mit mehreren Sprachen. Festschrift für Juliane House zum 60. Geburtstag.
Zeitschrift für interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht, 8(2/3), 240–251. Retrieved from
[URL].
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C.J
(
1985)
Frames and the semantics of understanding.
Quaderni di Semantica, 6, 222–254.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C.J
(
1986)
Pragmatically controlled zero anaphora. In
V. Nikiforidou,
M. VanClay,
M. Niepokuj, &
D. Feder (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 95–107). Berkeley: UC Berkeley Linguistics Department.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C.J., & Kay, P
(
1993)
Construction Grammar. Manuscript. UC Berkeley.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C.J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M.C
(
1988)
Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of ‘let alone’.
Language, 64, 501–538.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fiol, V
(
1987)
Sintaxis latina. Barcelona: Bosch.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fried, M
(
2005a)
A frame-based approach to case alternations: The swarm-class verbs in Czech.
Cognitive Linguistics, 16(3), 475–512.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fried, M
(
2005b)
The stability of meaning-form associations across time. In
P. Nejedlý, &
M. Vajdlová (Eds.),
Verba et historia (pp. 77–85). Praha: Ústav pro jazyk český AV ČR.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fried, M
(
2013)
Principles of constructional change. In
T. Hoffmann, &
G. Trousdale (Eds.),
The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 417–437). Oxford: Oxford Univesity Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garachana Camarero, M
(
2008)
En los límites de la gramaticalización. La evolución de “encima (de que)” como marcador del discurso.
Revista de Filología Española, LXXXVIII(1), 7–36.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A.E
(
1995)
Constructions. A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A.E
(
2006)
Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gonzálvez-García, F
(
2006a)
Passives without actives: Evidence from verbless complement constructions in Spanish.
Constructions, SV1-5/2006.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gonzálvez-García, F
(
2006b)
The fortunes of the competition between the accusative and infinitive and the NP + PRED complement constructions after “verba cogitandi” in English: A Construction Grammar view. In
J.G. Vázquez González,
M. Martínez Vázquez, &
P. Ron Vaz (Eds.),
The historical linguistics-cognitive linguistics interface (pp. 75–145). Huelva: Grupo de Gramática Contrastiva.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gonzálvez-García, F
(
2009)
The family of object-related depictives in English and Spanish: Towards a usage-based, constructionist analysis.
Language Sciences, 31(5), 663–723.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gonzálvez-García, F
(
2011)
Metaphor and metonymy do not render coercion superfluous: Evidence from the subjective-transitive construction.
Linguistics, 49(6), 1305–1358.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gurevich, O., Johnson, M., & Goldberg, A.E
(
2010)
Incidental verbatim memory for language.
Language and Cognition, 2(1), 45–78.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, L
(
1995)
The syntax of negation [
Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 75]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M.A.K
(
1985)
An introduction to functional grammar (1st ed.). London: Arnold.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M.A.K
(
1994)
An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Arnold.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Han, Ch
(
2000)
The structure and interpretation of imperatives: Mood and force in universal grammar. New York: Garland Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hartmann, K
(
2000)
Right node raising and gapping: Interface conditions on prosodic deletion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hasegawa, Y., Lee-Goldman, R., Ohara, K.H., Fujii, S., & Fillmore, C.J
Hens, G.W
(
1995)
Ditransitive constructions in German. (Ph.D. dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heycock, C
(
1994)
The internal structure of small clauses. In
J. Beckman (Ed.),
Proceedings of NELS 25 (Vol. 1, pp. 223–238). Amherst, MA: GLSA.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hilferty, J., & Valenzuela, J
(
2001)
Maximality and idealized cognitive models: The complementation of Spanish “tener”.
Language Sciences, 23, 629–637.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hilpert, M
(
2006)
A synchronic perspective on the grammaticalization of Swedish future constructions.
Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 29(2), 151–173.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hilpert, M
(
2013)
Corpus-based approaches to constructional change. In
T. Hoffmann, &
G. Trousdale (Eds.),
The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 458–475). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ionescu, D.C
(
1998)
Small clauses in English and Romanian. Bucureşti: Editura Universitatii Bucuresti.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kayne, R
(
1992)
Italian negative infinitival imperatives and clitic climbing. In
L. Tasmowski (Ed.),
Hommages à Nicolas Ruwet: De la musique à la linguistique (pp. 300–312). Ghent: Communication & Cognition.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kenniston, H
(
1937)
The syntax of Castilian prose. The sixteenth century. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G
(
1987)
Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lambrecht, K
(
1986)
Topic, focus, and the grammar of spoken French. (Ph.D. dissertation). The University of California, Berkeley.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lambrecht, K
(
1994)
Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lambrecht, K., & Lemoine, K
Lapesa, R
(
1957)
La obra literaria del Marqués de Santillana. Madrid: Ínsula.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lapesa, R
(
1964)
Los casos latinos: Restos sintácticos y sustitutos en español.
Boletín de la Real Academia Española, 44, 76–82.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lauwers, P., & Tobback, E
(
2011)
The rise of subjective meanings in the development of reflexive copulas in French. Paper delivered at the
10th International Conference on Tense, Aspect, Modality and Evidentiality
. Aston University, Birmingham, UK, April 2011.
Ledgeway, A
(
2012)
From Latin to Romance: Morphosyntactic typology and change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leino, J., & Östman, J.-O
(
2005)
Constructions and variability. In
M. Fried, &
H.C. Boas (Eds.),
Grammatical constructions – Back to the roots [
Constructional Approaches to Language Series, 4] (pp. 191–209). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leino, P., & Östman, J.-O
Lindström, J., & Londen, A.-M
López Muñoz, M
(
2002)
Delenda est machina? Informática y Filología Latina.
Revista de Estudios Latinos, 2, 235–250.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malkiel, Y
(
1978)
The classification of Romance languages.
Romance Philology, 31, 467–500.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martínez Vázquez, M
(
2003)
Gramática de construcciones (Contrastes entre el inglés y el español). Huelva: Grupo de Gramática Contrastiva.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martínez Vázquez, M
(
2004)
Learning argument structure generalizations in a foreign language.
Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 151–165.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Masini, F
(
2005)
Multi-word expressions between syntax and the lexicon: The case of Italian verb-particle constructions.
SKY Journal of Linguistics, 18, 145–173.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Michaelis, L.A
(
2003)
Headless constructions and coercion by construction. In
E. Francis, &
L.A. Michaelis (Eds.),
Mismatch: Form-function incongruity and the architecture of grammar (pp. 259–310). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Michaelis, L.A
(
2004)
Type shifting in Construction Grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion.
Cognitive Linguistics, 15(1), 1–67.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Michaelis, L.A
(
2012)
Making the case for Construction Grammar. In
H.C. Boas, &
I. Sag (Eds.),
Sign-based Construction Grammar (pp. 31–69). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Michaelis, L.A., & Ruppenhofer, J
(
2001)
Beyond alternations. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newmeyer, F.J
(
2010)
What conversational English tells us about the nature of grammar: A critique of Thompson’s analysis of object complements. In
K. Boye, &
E. Engberg-Pedersen (Eds.),
Language usage and language structure (pp. 3–44). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ouhalla, J
(
1994)
Introducing transformational grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Penny, R
(
1933)
Gramática histórica del español. Barcelona: Ariel.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinkster, H
(
1990)
Latin syntax and semantics. Translated by
Hotze Mulder. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pollard, C., & Sag, I
(
1994)
Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pons, L
(
2008)
Las construcciones imitativas del accusativus cum infinitivo: Modelos latinos y consecuencias romances.
Revista de Historia de la Lengua Española, 3, 118–148.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pountain, C
(
1998)
Learned syntax and the Romance languages: The “accusative and infinitive” construction with declarative verbs in Castilian.
Transactions of the Philological Society, 96(2), 159–201.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rostila, J
(
2005)
Zur Grammatikalisierung bei Präpositionalobjekten. In
T. Leuschner,
T. Mortelmans, &
S. De Groodt (Eds.),
Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen (pp. 135–166). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rytting, C.A
(
1999)
Small clauses and indirect discourse in Latin prose.
LACUS Forum, 25, 443–458.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Talmy, L
(
2000)
Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Timnyam, N. & Bergen, B.K
Tomasello, M
(
2003)
Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Torre, E
(
2011)
Grounding meaning in everyday experience in the world. An embodied Construction Grammar analysis of Italian caused-motion constructions. (Unpublished M.A. Thesis). University of Pavia, Italy.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Torre, E
(
2012)
Symmetry and asymmetry in Italian caused-motion constructions: An Embodied Construction Grammar approach.
Constructions. Retrieved from
[URL].
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, E.C., & Trousdale, G
(
2013)
Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trousdale, G., & Hoffmann, T
(Eds.) (
2013)
The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trousdale, G., & Traugott, E.C
Tsujimura, N
(
2005)
A constructional approach to mimetic verbs. In
M. Fried, &
H.C. Boas (Eds.),
Grammatical constructions – Back to the roots [
Constructional Approaches to Language Series, 4] (pp. 137–156). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Urrutia Cárdenas, H., & Álvarez Álvarez, M
(
1988)
Morfosintaxis histórica del español. Bilbao: Publicaciones de la Universidad de Deusto.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Valenzuela, J., & Rojo, A
(
2008)
What can language learners tell us about constructions?In
S. De Knop, &
T. De Rycker (Eds.),
Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar – Volume in honour of René Dirven (pp. 197–229). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Visser, F.T
(
1963/1973)
An historical syntax of the English language. 3 parts; 4 vols. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Boas, Hans C.
2020.
Constructions in English Grammar. In
The Handbook of English Linguistics,
► pp. 277 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Coussé, Evie, Steffen Höder, Benjamin Lyngfelt & Julia Prentice
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.