Article published in:
Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar
Edited by Hans C. Boas and Francisco Gonzálvez-García
[Constructional Approaches to Language 15] 2014
► pp. 139179
References

References

Abeillé, A., Bonami, O., Godard, D., & Tseng, J.
(2006) The syntax of French à and de: An HPSG analysis. In P. Saint-Dizier (Ed.), Syntax and semantics of prepositions (pp. 147–162). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Akmajian, A.
(1984) Sentence types and the form-function fit. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 2, 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Almenberg, S.
(1942) L’ellipse et l’infinitif de narration en français. Uppsala: Lundequistska Bokhandeln.Google Scholar
Avrutin, S.
(1999) Development of the syntax-discourse interface [Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics 23]. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barbaud, Ph
(1987) Chaînes pronominales et positions non-argumentales. Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 32, 1–46.Google Scholar
(1988) De la modernité de la grammaire dans le style indirect: Le cas de l’infinitif de narration. Revue Québécoise de Linguistique Théorique et Appliquée, 113–128.Google Scholar
Barron, J.
(2000) The morphosyntactic correlates of finiteness. In M. Butt, & T. Holloway King (Eds.), Proceedings of the LFG00 Conference University of California. Berkeley: CSLI Online Publications. available at: http://​csli​-publications​.stanford​.edu/Google Scholar
Bennett, Ch. E.
(1966) Syntax of early Latin. Vol 1. The verb. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Blatt, F.
(1952) Précis de syntaxe latine. Collection “Les langues du monde” 8. Lyon: IAC.Google Scholar
Blevins, J.P.
(2006) Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics, 42, 531–573. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boas, H.C., & Sag, I.
(Eds.) (2012) Sign-based Construction Grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Boser, K., Lust, B., Santelmann, L.M., & Whitman, J.
(1992) The syntax of CP and V2 in early child German. Proceedings of North-Eastern Linguistics Society , 23, 51–65.
Brandão, C.
(1963) Sintaxe clássica portuguêsa. Publicaçao 294. Minas Gerais: University.Google Scholar
Cavallin, S.
(1936) Zur Verwendung der sogenannten Infinitivus historicus im Lateinischen. Glotta, 25, 57–65.Google Scholar
Chausserie-Laprée, J.-P.
(1969) L’expression narrative chez les historiens latins, histoire d’un style. Paris: E. de Boccard.Google Scholar
Contino, S.
(1977) L’ infinitivo storico latino. Bologna: Pàtron.Google Scholar
Dominicy, M.
(1975) La phrase nominale en psychomécanique et en grammaire generative. In S. de Vriendt (Ed.), Grammaire générative et psychomécanique du language: Actes du colloque organisé par le Centre d’Études Linguistiques et Littérature de la Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Bruxelles, 29–31 Mai 1974. Études linguistiques 17 (pp. 177–208). Bruxelles: Aimav.Google Scholar
Dressler, W.
(1965) Die Funktion des historischen Infinitivs im lateinischen Verbsystem. Kratylos, 10, 190–196.Google Scholar
(1968) Studien zur verbalen Pluralität: Iterativum, Distributivum, Durativum, Intensivum in der allgemeinen Grammatik, im Lateinischen und Hethitischen. Graz: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Dubois, J.
(1969) Grammaire structurale du Français. Vol. 3. La phrase et les transformations. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Dubrovina, Z.M.
(1972) Infinitivy v finskom jazyke [Infinitives in Finnish]. Leningrad: LGU.Google Scholar
Englebert, A.
(1998) L’infinitif dit de narration. Paris–Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot.Google Scholar
Ernout, A., & Thomas, F.
(1964) Syntaxe latine. Nouvelle collection à l’usage des classes 38. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Etxepare, R., & Grohmann, K.
(2000) Conjunction of infinitival exclamatives and the null modal hypothesis. In K. Schwabe, & N. Zhang (Eds.), Ellipsis in conjunction (pp. 133–156). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
(2005) Towards a grammar of adult Root Infinitives. In J. Alderete, C. Han, & A. Kochetov (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th West Coast Conference of Formal Linguistics (pp. 129–137). Somerwill, MA: Cascadilla Proceeding Project.Google Scholar
Evans, N.
(2007) Insubordination and its uses. In I. Nikolaeva (Ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations (pp. 366–431). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Ch
(1976) The need for frame semantics within linguistics. Statistical Methods in Linguistics, 12, 5–29.Google Scholar
(1999) Inversion and constructional inheritance. In G. Webelhuth, J.P. Koenig, & A. Kathol (Eds.), Lexical and constructional aspects of linguistic explanation (pp. 113–128). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, J., & Sag, I.A.
(2001) Interrogative investigations: The form, meaning, and use of English interrogatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Grevisse, M.
(2001) Le bon usage: Grammaire française. Paris: Duculot.Google Scholar
Grohmann, K.
(1999) Infinitival exclamatives. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, 8, 213–238.Google Scholar
(2000) Null modals in Germanic (and Romance): Infinitival exclamatives. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 14, 43–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grohmann, K., & Etxepare, R.
(2003) Root infinitives: A comparative view. Probus, 15, 201–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guillaume, G.
(1964) Langage et science du langage. Paris: Nizet.Google Scholar
Jänicke, H.
(1895) Erklärung und Gebrauch des sogenannten Infinitivus historicus. Jahrbücher für klassische Philologie, 41, 134–138.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L.
(1995) Root infinitives, tense, and truncated structures in Dutch. Language Acquisition, 4(3), 205–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Han, C.-H.
(2000) The structure and interpretation of imperatives. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Hessen, B.
(1984) Der historische Infinitiv im Wandel der Darstellungstechnik Sallusts. Studien zur klassischen Philologie 10. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hofmann, J.B.
(1972) Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik: Mit dem allgemeinen Teil der Lateinischen Grammatik. Neubearb. von Anton Szantyr. Verb. Nachdr. d. 1. Aufl. 1965. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Hollerbach, W.
(1994) The syntax of contemporary French: A pedagogical handbook and reference grammar. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, T., & Hyams, N.
(1998) Aspects of root infinitives. Lingua, 106, 81–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kathol, A.
(2000) Linear syntax. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, R.
(1992) Italian negative infinitival imperatives and clitic climbing. In L. Tasmowski (Ed.), Hommages à Nicolas Ruwet: De la musique à la linguistique (pp. 300–312). Ghent: Communication & Cognition.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P.
(1968) Tense and mood in Indo-European syntax. Foundations of Language, 4, 30–57.Google Scholar
Klein, W.
(1994) Time in language. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Krenn, H.
(1996) Italienische Grammatik. München: Max Hueber Verlag.Google Scholar
Kretschmer, P.
(1910) Zur Erklärung des sogenannten Infinitivus historicus. Glotta, 2, 270–287.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R.
(1968) Abstract syntax and Latin complementation [Research monograph 49]. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K.
(1990) “What, me worry?” – ‘Mad Magazine sentences’ revisited. Berkeley Linguistic Society, 16, 215–228.Google Scholar
(1994) Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lasser, I.
(1997) Finiteness in adult and child German[MPI series in psycholinguistics]. Wageningen: Ponsen and Looijen bv.Google Scholar
(2002) The roots of root infinitives: Remarks on infinitival main clauses in adult and child language. Linguistics, 40, 767–796. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Léard, J.-M.
(1992) Les gallicismes. Etude syntaxique et sémantique. Paris & Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot.Google Scholar
Lombard, A.
(1936) L’ infinitif de narration dans les langues romanes: Étude de syntaxe historique.Humanistiska Vetenskapssamfundet (Uppsala): Skrifter 30. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells.Google Scholar
Luker, B.
(1966 [1916]) The use of the infinitive instead of a finite verb in French. Repr. d. Ausg. New York 1916. Columbia University studies in Romance philology and literature 18. New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar
Marcou, Ph
(1888) Der historische infinitiv im Französischen. Berlin: G. Bernstein.Google Scholar
Martin, L.
(1971) Temps et aspect. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Maurer, Th
(1968) O Infinito flexionado português: Estudo histórico-descritivo. Biblioteca universitária 5, 1, São Paulo: Comp. Ed. Nacional.Google Scholar
Meillet, A., & Vendryes, J.
(1924) Traité de grammaire comparée des langues classiques. Paris: Librairie Ancienne Edouard Champion.Google Scholar
Melis, L.
(2000) L’Infinitif de narration comme prédication seconde. Langages, 127, 36–48.Google Scholar
Menge, H.
(2000) Lehrbuch der lateinischen Syntax und Semantik. Völlig neu bearbeitet von Thorsten Burkard. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, W.
(1900) Grammaire des langues romanes. Vol. 3. Syntaxe. Paris: H. Welter.Google Scholar
Moignet, G.
(1975) Existe-t-il en français une proposition infinitive?In A. Joly, W.H. Hirtle, & S. Clarke (Eds.), Grammaire générative transformationnelle et psychomécanique du language. Cahiers de linguistique 1.Villeneuve-d’Ascq: Publications de l’Université de Lille.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, I.
(2007) Constructional economy and nonfinite independent clauses. In I. Nikolaeva (Ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations (pp. 138–182). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perrochat, P.
(1932) L’infinitif de narration en latin. Collection d’études latines. Série scientifique 10. Paris: Soc.d’ed. Les Belles-lettres.Google Scholar
Pinkster, H.
(1983) Tempus, Aspekt und Aktionsart in Latein. Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, 29(1), 270–319.Google Scholar
Reis, M.
(1995) Über infinite Nominativkonstruktionen im Deutschen. In O. Önnerfors (Ed.), Sprache und Pragmatik. Arbeitsberichte. Festvorträge anlässlich des 60. Geburtstags von Inger Rosengren (pp. 114–156). Lund.Google Scholar
(2003) On the form and interpretation of German Wh-infinitives. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 15, 155–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rémi-Giraud, S., & Basset, L.
(1988) L’infinitif: Une approche comparative. Lyon: Pr. Univ. de Lyon.Google Scholar
Riemann, O.
(1942) Syntaxe latine d’après les principes de la grammaire historique (7. éd). revue par A. Ernout. Nouvelle collection à l’usage des classes 11. Nouveau triage. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L.
(1994) Early null subjects and root null infinitives. In T. Hoekstra, & B. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 151–177). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, I.
(2007) Diachronic syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosén, H.
(1995) The Latin infinitivus historicus revisited. Mnemosyne, 48, 536–564. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, J.R.
(1970) On declarative sentences. In R.A. Jacobs, & P.S. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar (pp. 222–272). Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Sag, I.
(2012) Sign-based Construction Grammar: An informal synopsis. In H. Boas, & I. Sag (Eds.), Sign-based Construction Grammar (pp. 61–188). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Sandfeld, Kr
(1965) Syntax du français contemporain. L’infinitif. Genève: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Sandoval, M.
(1986) Infinitive sentences in Spanish. (PhD. dissertation). The University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Schlicher, J.J.
(1914, 1915) The historical infinitive. Classical Philology, 9, 279–294, 374–394, 10, 54–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schuster, M.
(1926) Zu den theorien über die entstehung und das wesen des sogenannten historischen infinitivs. In C. Hauser (Ed.), Festschrift für Universitaetsprofessor Hofrat Dr. Paul Kretschmer: Beitr. zur griech. u. lat. Sprachforschung (pp. 224–243).Wien: Deutscher Verlag für Jugend und Volk.Google Scholar
Sells, P.
(2007) Finiteness in non-transformational syntactic frameworks. In I. Nikolaeva (Ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations (pp. 59–89). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stump, G.
(2001) Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torterat, F.
(2008) Citation et textologie du journal: Ce que vient faire l’infinitif de narration dans les colonnes des quotidiens. Discours. Revue de linguistique, psycholinguistique et informatique, 3. Retrieved from http://​discours​.revues​.org​/index4343​.html.Google Scholar
Touratier, Ch
(1996) Le systeme verbal français (description morphologique et morphématique). Paris: Colin.Google Scholar
Viljamaa, T.
(1983) Infintive of narration in Livy. A study in narrative technique. Turku: Turun Yliopisto.Google Scholar
Wackernagel, J.
(1888) Über die geschichte des historischen Infinitivus. Verhandlungen der 39ten Versammlung deutscher Philologen, 276–283.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Anthonissen, Lynn, Astrid De Wit & Tanja Mortelmans
2019. (Inter)subjective uses of the Dutch progressive constructions . Linguistics 57:5  pp. 1111 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.