Focusing on two Romance languages, French and Romanian, we provide a detailed analysis of gapping and present several empirical arguments for preferring a construction-based approach of gapping (with semantic reconstruction of ellipsis) over alternative accounts that rely on movement or deletion. We then study parallelism constraints and show that syntactic parallelism is less strict than what is usually assumed, while discourse parallelism is clearly required. Syntax is not completely ignored though, as each remnant is required to match some subcategorization frame of the verbal predicate its correlate depends on. We show how those core properties can be accounted for within a construction-based framework relying on inheritance hierarchies of typed feature structures, such as HPSG in its more recent versions.
Abeillé, A. (2003). A lexicalist and construction-based approach to coordinations. In S. Müller (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (pp. 5–25). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Abeillé, A. (2005). Les syntagmes conjoints et leurs fonctions syntaxiques. Langages, 160, 42–66.
Abeillé, A., & Godard, D. (2003). Les prédicats complexes dans les langues romanes. In D. Godard (Ed.), Les langues romanes. Paris: Editions du CNRS.
Abeillé, A., & Mouret, F. (2010). Quelques contraintes sur les coordinations elliptiques en français. Revue de sémantique et de pragmatique, 24, 177–207.
Barbu, A.M. (2004). Statutul semiadverbelor din cadrul complexului verbal. In G. Pană Dindelegan (Ed.), Tradiţie şi inovaţie în studiul limbii române (pp. 625–634). Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.
Beck, S. (1997). On the semantics of comparative conditionals. Linguistics and Philosophy, 20, 229–232.
Bîlbîie, G. (2008). A syntactic account of Romanian correlative coordination from a Romance perspective. In S. Müller (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (pp. 25–45). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Bîlbîie, G. (2011). Grammaire des constructions elliptiques: Une étude comparative des phrases sans verbe en roumain et en français. (Ph.D. Dissertation). Université Paris 7.
Bîlbîie, G., & Winterstein, G. (2011). Expressing contrast in Romanian: The conjunction iar. In J. Berns, H. Jacobs, & T. Scheer (Eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2009: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Nice 2009 (pp. 1–18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bîlbîie, G. (in prep.). Gapping and right node raising in the English Penn Treebank.Manuscript, LLF & Université Paris 7.
Borsley, R. (2005). Against ConjP. Lingua, 115, 461–482.
Chao, W. (1987). On ellipsis. (Ph.D. Dissertation). University of Massachusetts.
Chaves, R. (2005). A linearization-based approach to gapping. In G. Jäger, P. Monachesi, G. Penn, & S. Wintner (Eds.),
FG-MOL 2005: The 10th conference on Formal Grammar and the 9th Meeting on Mathematics of Language
(pp.207–220).University of Edinburgh.
Coppock, E. (2001). Gapping: In defense of deletion. In M. Andronis, C. Ball, H. Elston, & S. Neuvel (Eds.), Papers from the 37th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 133–148). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Culicover, P., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dalrymple, M., Sheiber, S., & Pereira, F. (1991). Ellipsis and higher order unification. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14, 399–452.
Elugardo, R., & Stainton, R. (2005). Introduction. In R. Elugardo, & R. Stainton (Eds.), Ellipsis and nonsentential speech (pp. 1–26). Netherlands: Springer.
Fillmore, C.J., & Kay, P. (1996). Construction Grammar coursebook. Unpublished manuscript, UC Berkeley.
Gardent, C. (1991). Gapping and VP ellipsis in a unification-based grammar. (Ph.D. Dissertation). University of Edinburgh.
Ginzburg, J. (2012). The interactive stance: Meaning for conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ginzburg, J., & Sag, I.A. (2000). Interrogative investigations: The form, meaning and use of English interrogatives. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Grévisse, M., & Goosse, A. (1991). Le bon usage (11ème éd.). Louvain: Duculot.
Hankamer, J. (1971). Constraints on deletion in syntax. (Ph.D. Dissertation). Yale University.
Hartmann, K. (2000). Right node raising and gapping. Interface conditions on prosodic deletion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Huddleston, R., Payne, J., & Peterson, P. (2002). Coordination and supplementation. In R. Huddleston, & G.K. Pullum (Eds.), The Cambridge grammar of the English language (pp. 1273–1362). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ionescu, E. (2004). Understanding Romanian negation: Syntactic and semantic approaches in a declarative perspective. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.
Jasinskaja, K., & Zeevat, H. (2009). Explaining conjunction systems: Russian, English, German. In A. Riester, & T. Solstad (Eds.),
Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 13, vol. 5 of SinSpeC. Working Papers of the SFB 732
(pp. 231–245). University of Stuttgart.
Johnson, K. (1994). Bridging the gap. Manuscript, University of Massachusettsat Amherst.
Johnson, K. (1996). In search of the English middle field. Manuscript, University of Massachusettsat Amherst.
Johnson, K. (2009). Gapping is not (VP-) ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry, 40(2), 289–328.
Kehler, A. (2002). Coherence, reference and the theory of grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Konietzko, A., & Winkler, S. (2010). Contrastive ellipsis: Mapping between syntax and information structure. Lingua, 120, 1436–1457.
Kuno, S. (1976). Gapping: A functional analysis. Linguistic Inquiry, 7(2), 300–318.
Lakoff, G. (1974). Syntactic amalgams.
Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting
(pp. 321–344). Chicago Linguistic Society.
Merchant, J. (2001). The syntax of silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Merchant, J. (2004). Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, 661–738.
Miller, Ph., & Sag, I.A. (1997). French clitic movement without clitics or movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 15, 573–639.
Molnár, V., & Winkler, S. (2010). Edges and gaps: The role of contrast in the theory of grammar. Lingua, 120, 1392–1415.
Monachesi, P. (1999). A lexical approach to Italian cliticization. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Mouret, F. (2005). La syntaxe des coordinations corrélatives en français. Langages, 160, 67–93.
Mouret, F. (2006). A phrase structure approach to argument cluster coordination. In S. Müller (Ed.), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (pp. 247–267). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Mouret, F. (2007). Grammaire des constructions coordonnées. Coordinations simples et coordinations à redoublement en français contemporain. Lille: ANRT.
Morgan, J. (1973). Sentence fragments and the notion ‘sentence’. In B.B. Kachru, R.B. Lees, Y. Malkier, D. Pietrangeli, & S. Saporta (Eds.), Issues in linguistics: Papers in honor of Henry and Renée Kahane (pp. 719–751). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Munn, A. (1992). A null operator analysis of ATB gaps. The Linguistic Review, 9, 1–26.
Neijt, A. (1979). Gapping. A contribution to sentence grammar. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Repp, S. (2009). Negation in gapping. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rigaud, N. (2010). L’art du vide: Pour une approche descriptive des phénomènes elliptiques. (Ph.D. Dissertation). Université de Provence.
Ross, J. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. (Ph.D. Dissertation). MIT.
Ross, J. (1970). Gapping and the order of constituents. In M. Bierwisch, & K. Heidolph (Eds.), Progress in linguistics (pp. 249–259). The Hague: Mouton.
Sag, I.A. (1976). Deletion and logical form. (Ph.D. Dissertation). MIT.
Sag, I.A. (1997). English relative clause constructions. Journal of Linguistics, 33, 431–484.
Sag, I.A. (2003). Coordination and underspecification. In J.B. Kim, & S. Wechsler (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (pp. 267–291). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Sag, I.A. (2012). Sign-based Construction Grammar: An informal synopsis. In H.C. Boas, & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Sign-based Construction Grammar (pp. 69–201). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Sag, I.A., Gazdar, G., Wasow, T., & Weisler, S. (1985). Coordination and how to distinguish categories. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 3, 117–171.
Siegel, M. (1984). Gapping and interpretation. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 523–530.
Steedman, M. (1990). Gapping as constituent coordination. Linguistics and Philosophy, 13, 207–263.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Abeillé, Anne
2024. The empirical turn and its consequences for theoretical syntax. Theoretical Linguistics 50:1-2 ► pp. 5 ff.
Kim, Jeong-Seok, Duk-Ho Jung, Jee Young Lee & Su-Hyuk Yoon
2024. Tense mismatches in Korean gapping and bare ko-coordination: an experimental study. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 60:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Abeillé, Anne & Jong-Bok Kim
2022. Me toofragments in English and French: a direct interpretation approach. The Linguistic Review 39:3 ► pp. 495 ff.
Bîlbîie, Gabriela & Pegah Faghiri
2022. An experimental perspective on embedded gapping in Persian. The Linguistic Review 39:3 ► pp. 557 ff.
Kim, Jong-Bok & Jeffrey T. Runner
2022. Pseudogapping in English: a direct interpretation approach. The Linguistic Review 39:3 ► pp. 457 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.