Article published in:
Subjects in Constructions – Canonical and Non-CanonicalEdited by Marja-Liisa Helasvuo and Tuomas Huumo
[Constructional Approaches to Language 16] 2015
► pp. 43–72
Hidden subjects in conversation
Estonian personless verb forms as referential devices9
The chapter deals with implicit unspecific group referents introduced by verb forms (the conditional and the impersonal) which lack person marking. They have different contexts of use: the personless conditional is preferred when the aim of the conversation is to plan a future activity, while the existential impersonal is first and foremost used in narratives. The personless conditional is typically inclusive, incorporating one or both of the interlocutors into the group. The impersonal is typically speaker-exclusive and refers to a group that does not include the participants of the conversation. For the analysis, the data from the Corpus of Spoken Estonian (University of Tartu) are used.
Published online: 14 January 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.16.03paj
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.16.03paj
References
Chafe, Wallace
Cornish, Francis
Du Bois, John W
Erelt, Mati, Kasik, Reet, Metslang, Helle, Rajandi, Henno, Ross, Kristiina, Saari, Henn, Tael, Kaja, & Vare, Silvi
Givón, T
Gundel, Jeanette, Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron
Gundel, Jeanette, Bassene, Mamadou, Gordon, Bryan, Humnick, Linda, & Khalfaoui, Amel
Hanks, William F
Hakulinen, Auli, Vilkuna, Maria, Korhonen, Riitta, Koivisto, Vesa, Heinonen, Tarja-Riitta, & Alho, Irja
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
Kaiser, Elsi
Kauppinen, Anneli
Keevallik, Leelo
Lambrecht, Knud
Laury, Ritva
Lindström, Liina
Lindström, Liina, & Vihman, Virve
Metslang, Helle
Pajusalu, Renate
Pajusalu, Renate, & Pajusalu, Karl
Pajusalu, Renate, Vihman, Virve, Birute, Klaas, & Pajusalu, Karl
Pool, Raili
Torn, Reeli
Torn-Leesik, Reeli