Article published in:
Subjects in Constructions – Canonical and Non-CanonicalEdited by Marja-Liisa Helasvuo and Tuomas Huumo
[Constructional Approaches to Language 16] 2015
► pp. 253–291
From canon to monolith to clusters
A constructionist model of subjecthood in Russian
The status of oblique subjects is a contested topic. Subjecthood is typically
defined relative to syntactic tests in formal approaches and different tests have
been proposed in the literature. However, they have not been applied systematically
to cover a wide range of constructions such as oblique subjects in Russian.
This study presents a clustered model of subjecthood building on ten construction
types and twenty features of subjecthood in Russian based on construction
grammar and Keenan’s (1976) study. The structure of the model indicates
that Russian has two clustered subject constructions: the nominative and the
dative. These types motivate the deviations displayed by the other constructions.
Hence, subjecthood is defined as a fully motivated network structure.
Published online: 14 January 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.16.10kyr
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.16.10kyr
References
References
Ackerman, Farrell & Moore, John
(2009) Proto-properties and obliqueness. Paper given at the conference Case in and across Languages. Helsinki 27–29.8.
Arutjunova, N.D.
Baayen, Harald R.
Barðdal, Jóhanna
Barðdal, Jóhanna, & Eythórsson, Thórhallur
Bhaskararao, Peri, & Subbarao, Venkata Karumuri
Bock, Kathryn, Loebell, Helga, & Morey, Randal
Croft, William
Croft, William, & Cruse, Alan D.
Czeczulin, Annalisa
(2007) The Russian reflexive in second-language acquisition: Binding preferences and L1 transfer. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
Divjak, Dagmar
Divjak, Dagmar, & Janda, Laura A.
Dryer, Matthew
Eythórsson, Thórhallur, & Barðdal, Jóhanna
Fillmore, Charles J.
Fortuin, Egbert
Gerritsen, Nelleke
Goldberg, Adele E.
Greenberg, Gerald R., & Franks, Steven
Halizeva, V.S.
Haspelmath, Martin
Hopper, Paul J., & Thompson, Sandra A.
Janda, Laura A.
Kaufman, Leonard, & Rousseeuw, Peter J.
Kay, Paul, & Fillmore, Charles J.
Keenan, Edward L.
Koenig, Jean-Pierre, Mauer, Gail, & Bienvenue, Breton
Kyröläinen, Aki-Juhani
(2008) Low-frequency constructions and salience: A case study on Russian verbs of motion of dative impersonal construction type. In A. Mustajoki, M.V. Kopotev, L.A. Birjulin, & E.J. Protasova (Eds.), Instrumentarij rusistiki: korpusnye podhody (pp. 176–197). Helsinki: Department of Slavonic and Baltic Languages and Literatures.
Langacker, Ronald W.
Leinonen, Marja
Moore, John, & Perlmutter, David M.
Osherson, Daniel N., Wilkie, Ormond, Smith, Edward E., Lopez, Alejandro, & Shafir, Eldar
Paducheva, Elena
Paradis, Emmanuel, Claude, Julien, & Strimmer, Korbinian
Perlmutter, David, & Moore, John
Rubinstein, George
Seo, Seunghyun
(2001) The frequency of null subject in Russian, Polish, Czech, Bulgarian and Serbo-Croatian: An analysis according to morphosyntactic environments. Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana University at Bloomington.
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann
Silverstein, Michael
Timberlake, Alan
Wierzbicka, Anna
Zdorenko, Tatiana
Zimmerling, Anton
(2009) Dative subjects and semi-expletive pronouns in Russian. In G. Zybatow, U. Junghanns, D. Lenertová, & P. Biskup, (Eds.), Studies in formal Slavic phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics and information structure. Proceedings of FDS 7, Leipzig 2007 (pp. 253–265). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.