Article published in:

Diachronic Construction Grammar
Edited by Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer and Spike Gildea
[Constructional Approaches to Language 18] 2015
► pp. 1–50

Diachronic Construction Grammar

Epistemological context, basic assumptions and historical implications

Jóhanna Barðdal | Ghent University & University of Bergen

Spike Gildea | University of Oregon & Collegium de Lyon

The main goal of this chapter is to discuss the value of the Construction Grammar framework to solving perceived problems with diachronic syntax. As such, one part of this chapter provides a condensed review of previous research in diachronic syntax, including a brief discussion of why many linguists have doubted the value of such work. While most of this early work did not emphasize the importance of constructions to our understanding of either synchronic or diachronic syntax, we do identify earlier examples of work for which the notion of construction was crucial, although not richly developed. The bulk of the chapter then proposes ways in which a constructional perspective/theory allows us to address some of these perceived problems with the study of diachronic syntax, hence providing a research context for the individual studies published in this volume.

Published online: 30 July 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.01bar

Cited by

Cited by 31 other publications

No author info given

2021. In Lost in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 218],

Alba-Salas, Josep

2020. Construccionalización y obsolescencia en las colocaciones tipo <em>caerle/venirle/entrarle en N</em><sub>‘agrado’</sub>. Revista de Filología Española 100:1 ► pp. 9 ff.

Barđdal, Jóhanna, Leonid Kulikov, Roland Pooth & Peter Alexander Kerkhof

2020. Oblique anticausatives: A morphosyntactic isogloss in Indo-European. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 56:3 ► pp. 413 ff.

Birchall, Joshua

2018. Historical change in reported speech constructions in the Chapacuran family. Journal of Historical Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 7 ff.

Chappell, Hilary & Jean‐Christophe Verstraete

2019. Optional and alternating case marking: Typology and diachrony. Language and Linguistics Compass 13:3 ► pp. e12311 ff.

Colleman, Timothy

2016. A reflection on constructionalization and constructional borrowing, inspired by an emerging Dutch replica of the ‘time’-away construction. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30 ► pp. 91 ff.

Colleman, Timothy

2018. In Constructions in Contact [Constructional Approaches to Language, 24], ► pp. 143 ff.

D’hoedt, Frauke, Hendrik De Smet & Hubert Cuyckens

2019. Constructions Waxing and Waning: A Brief History of the Zero-Secondary Predicate Construction. Journal of English Linguistics 47:1 ► pp. 3 ff.

Fanego, Teresa

2021. “Don’t go getting into trouble again!”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics

Fonteyn, Lauren & Charlotte Maekelberghe

2018. Competing motivations in the diachronic nominalization of English gerunds. Diachronica 35:4 ► pp. 487 ff.

Gildea, Spike & Joana Jansen

2018. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language, 121], ► pp. 129 ff.

Guardamagna, Caterina

2018. In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21], ► pp. 169 ff.

Gyselinck, Emmeline

2020. In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27], ► pp. 108 ff.

Gyselinck, Emmeline & Timothy Colleman

2016. Tracking shifts in the literal versus the intensifying fake reflexive resultative construction. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30 ► pp. 55 ff.

Herbst, Thomas & Peter Uhrig

2020. The issue of specifying slots in argument structure constructions in terms of form and meaning. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34 ► pp. 135 ff.

Hilpert, Martin

2018. In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21], ► pp. 21 ff.

Hölzl, Andreas

2018. In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21], ► pp. 241 ff.

Johnson, Cynthia A., Peter Alexander Kerkhof, Leonid Kulikov, Esther Le Mair & Jóhanna Barðdal

2019. Argument structure, conceptual metaphor and semantic change. Diachronica 36:4 ► pp. 463 ff.

Kuo, Yueh Hsin

2021. In Lost in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 218], ► pp. 131 ff.

Nieuwenhuijsen, Dorien

2018. Changing frequencies in a constructional landscape. Diachronica 35:2 ► pp. 210 ff.

Noël, Dirk

2016. For a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30 ► pp. 39 ff.

Noël, Dirk

2019. The author and the text in radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar, or why historical linguists have started analysing text again. Functions of Language 26:1 ► pp. 56 ff.

Rosemeyer, Malte & Mar Garachana

2019. De la consecución a la contraexpectación: la construccionalización de lograr/conseguir + infinitivo . Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 12:2 ► pp. 383 ff.

Rosés Labrada, Jorge Emilio

2018. The Piaroa subject marking system and its diachrony. Journal of Historical Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 31 ff.

Rudnicka, Karolina

2021. The “negative end” of change in grammar: terminology, concepts and causes. Linguistics Vanguard 7:1

Smirnova, Elena & Lotte Sommerer

2020. In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27], ► pp. 2 ff.

Sommerer, Lotte

2020. In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27], ► pp. 70 ff.

Sommerer, Lotte

2020. Why we avoid the ‘Multiple Inheritance’ issue in Usage-based Cognitive Construction Grammar. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34 ► pp. 320 ff.

Sundquist, John D.

2020. Productivity, richness, and diversity of light verb constructions in the history of American English. Journal of Historical Linguistics 10:3 ► pp. 349 ff.

Vangaever, Jasper

2021. On la voit se développant : la construction progressive présentative du latin tardif à l’ancien français. Langue française N° 209:1 ► pp. 63 ff.

Zehentner, Eva & Elizabeth Closs Traugott

2020. In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27], ► pp. 168 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References:

Barðdal, J.

(1999) Case and argument structure of some loan verbs in 15th century Icelandic. In I. Haskå, & C. Sandqvist (Eds.), Alla tiders språk. En Vänskrift till Gertrud Pettersson november 1999 (pp. 9–23). Lundastudier i Nordisk språkvetenskap A 55. Lund: Institutionen för nordiska språk.

(2001a) The perplexity of Dat-Nom verbs in Icelandic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 24, 47–70.

(2001b) The role of thematic roles in constructions? Evidence from the Icelandic inchoative. In A. Holmer, J. Svantesson, & Å. Viberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Scandinavian conference of linguistics 2000 (pp. 127–137). Lund: Department of Linguistics, Lund University.

(2006) Construction-specific properties of syntactic subjects in Icelandic and German. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(1), 39–106.

(2007) The semantic and lexical range of the Ditransitive Construction in the history of (North) Germanic. Functions of Language, 14(1), 9–30.

(2008) Productivity: Evidence from case and argument structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

(2009) The development of case in Germanic. In J. Barðdal, & S.L. Chelliah (Eds.), The role of semantic, pragmatic and discourse factors in the development of case (pp. 123–159). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

(2011) The rise of dative substitution in the history of Icelandic: A diachronic construction grammar approach. Lingua, 121(1), 60–79.

(2012) Predicting the productivity of argument structure constructions. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 32(2006), 467–478.

(2013) Construction-based historical comparative reconstruction. In T. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 438–457). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

(2014) Syntax and syntactic reconstruction. In C. Bowern, & B. Evans (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical Linguistics (pp. 343–373). London: Routledge.

Barðdal, J., Bjarnadóttir, V., Danesi, S., Dewey, T.K., Eythórsson, T., Fedriani, C., & Smitherman, T.

(2013) The story of 'woe'. Journal of Indo-European Studies, 41(3–4), 321–377.

Barðdal, J., & Eythórsson, T.

(2006) Control infinitives and case in Germanic: 'Performance error' or marginally acceptable constructions. In L. Kulikov, A. Malchukov, & P. de Swart (Eds.), Case, valency and transitivity (pp. 147–177). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

(2012a) Reconstructing syntax: Construction grammar and the Comparative Method. In H.C. Boas, & I.A. Sag (Eds.), Sign-based construction grammar (pp. 257–308). Stanford: CSLI Publications.

(2012b) "Hungering and lusting for women and fleshly delicacies": Reconstructing grammatical relations for Proto-Germanic. Transactions of the Philological Society, 110(3), 363–393.

Barðdal, J., Kristoffersen, K.E., & Sveen, A.

(2011) West Scandinavian Ditransitives as a family of constructions: With a special attention to the Norwegian V-REFL-NP Construction. Linguistics, 49(1), 53–104.

Barðdal, J., & Smitherman, T.

(2013) The quest for cognates: A reconstruction of oblique subject constructions in Proto-Indo-European. Language Dynamics and Change, 3(1), 28–67.

Barðdal, J., Smitherman, T., Bjarnadóttir, V., Danesi, S., Jenset, G.B., & McGillivray, B.

(2012) Reconstructing constructional semantics: The dative subject construction in old Norse-Icelandic, Latin, Ancient Greek, Old Russian and Old Lithuanian. Studies in Language, 36(3), 511–547.

Bergen, B., & Chang, N.

(2013) Embodied construction grammar. In T. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 168–190). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bergen, B.K., & Plauché, M.C.

(2001) Voilà voilà: Extensions of deictic constructions in French. In A. Cienki, B. Luka, & M. Smith (Eds.), Conceptual and discourse factors in linguistic structure (pp. 45–61). Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Bisang, W.

(2010) Grammaticalization in Chinese: A construction-based account. In E.C. Traugott, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization (pp. 245–277). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Blumenthal-Dramé, A.

(2012) Entrenchment in usage-based theories: What corpus data do and do not reveal about the mind. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Bopp, F.

(1816) Über das Conjugationssystem der Sanskritsprache in Vergleichung mit jenem der griechischen, lateinischen, persischen und germanischen Sprache. Frankfurt: Frankfurt am Main.

Brinton, L.J., & Traugott, E.C.

(2005) Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bybee, J.L.

(1985) Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Bybee, J.

(1995) Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10(5), 425–455.

Bybee, J.L.

(2001) Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

(2003) Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In B.D. Joseph, & R.D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 602–623). Oxford: Blackwell.

Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W.

(1994) The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bybee, J., & Scheibman, J.

(1999) The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: The reduction of don't in English. Linguistics, 37(4), 575–596.

Campbell, L.

(Ed.) (2001) Grammaticalization: A critical assessment, Special issue of Language Sciences, 23(2–3).

(2001) What’s wrong with grammaticalization? Language Sciences, 23, 113–161.

Campbell, L., & R.D. Janda

(2001) Introduction: Conceptions of grammaticalization and their problems. Language Sciences, 23(2–3), 93–112.

Clausner, T.C.

(2002) How conceptual metaphors are productive of spatial–graphical expressions. In W.D. Grey, & C.D. Shunn, 20 (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 208–213). Mahwa, NJ: Erlbaum.

Clausner, T.C., & W.A. Croft

(1997) Productivity and schematicity in metaphors. Cognitive Science, 21(3), 247–282.

Cole, P., Harbert, W., Hermon, G., & Sridhar, S.N.

(1980) The acquisition of subjecthood. Language, 56, 719–743.

Colleman, T., & De Clerck, B.

(2011) Constructional semantics on the move: On semantic specialization in the English double object construction. Cognitive Linguistics, 22(1), 183–209.

Cristofaro, S.

(2009) Grammatical categories and relations: Universality vs. language-specificity and construction-specificity. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 441–479.

Croft, W.

(2000) Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. London: Longman.

(2001) Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

(2003) Lexical rules vs. constructions: A false dichotomy. In H. Cuyckens, T. Berg, R. Dirven, & K. Panther (Eds.), Motivation in language: Studies in honour of Günter Radden (pp. 49–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Croft, W., & Cruse, D.A.

(2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dahl, E.

(2009) Some semantic and pragmatic aspects of object alternation in Early Vedic. In J. Barðdal, & S.L. Chelliah (Eds.), The role of semantic, pragmatic and discourse factors in the development of case (pp. 23–55). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

De Smet, H.

(2009) Analysing reanalysis. Lingua, 119, 1728–1755.

Eckhoff, H.M.

(2009) A usage-based approach to change: Old Russian possessive constructions. In J. Barðdal, & S.L. Chelliah (Eds.), The role of semantic, pragmatic and discourse factors in the development of case (pp. 161–180). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Elvira, J.

(2011) Constructions of uncontrolled state or event: The increase in productivity of a new argument structure in Old Spanish. Constructions and Frames, 3(2), 184–207.

Eythórsson, T., & Barðdal, J.

(2011) Die konstruktionsgrammatik und die komparative Methode. In T. Krisch & T. Lindner (Eds.), Indogermanistik und Linguistik im Dialog: Akten der XIII. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 21. bis 27. September 2008 in Salzburg (pp. 148–156). Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag.

Fedriani, C.

(2009) The “Behavior-Before-Coding” principle: Further evidence from Latin. Archivio Glottologico Italiano, XCIV(2), 156–184.

Fillmore, C.J.

(1968) The case for case. In E. Bach, & R.T. Harms (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory (pp. 1–88). New York: Holt, Rinehart &Winston.

(1982) Frame semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin.

(1984) Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6, 222–254.

(2013) Berkeley construction grammar. In T. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 111–132). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fillmore, C.J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M.C.

(1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language, 64, 501–538.

Fried, M., & Östman, J.

(2004) Construction grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In M. Fried, & J Östman (Eds.), Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective (pp. 11–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Fløgstad, G.

(2014) Forking paths: Subfunction variation and the Rioplatense preterit. Ph.D. Dissertation, Oslo University.

Gabelentz, G. von der

(1891) Die Sprachwissenschaft. Ihre Aufgaben, Methoden, und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig: Weigel.

Gildea, S.

(1992) Comparative Cariban morphosyntax: On the genesis of ergativity in independent clauses. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Oregon.

(1993) The rigid postverbal subject in Panare: A historical explanation. International Journal of American Linguistics (IJAL), 59, 44–63.

(1997) Evolution of grammatical relations in Cariban: How functional motivation precedes syntactic change. In T. Givón (Ed.), Grammatical relations: A functionalist perspective (pp. 155–198). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

(1998) On reconstructing grammar: Comparative Cariban morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

(2000) On the genesis of the verb phrase in Cariban languages. In S. Gildea (Ed.), Reconstructing grammar: Comparative linguistics and grammaticalization (pp. 65–106). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Givón, T.

(1971) Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: An archaeologist’s field trip. Chicago Linguistic Society, 7, 394–415.

(1976) Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In C. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 149–188). New York: Academic Press.

(1979) On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.

(2008) The genesis of syntactic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Goldberg, A.E.

(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

(2013) Constructionist approaches. In T. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 15–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goldberg, A.E., & R.S. Jackendoff

(2004) The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language, 80, 532–568.

Harris, A.C.

(1985) Diachronic syntax: The Kartvelian case. New York: Academic Press.

(1990) Alignment typology and diachronic change. In W. Lehmann (Ed.), Language typology 1987: Systematic balance in language (pp. 67–90). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

(2008) Reconstruction in syntax: Reconstruction of patterns. In G. Ferraresi, & M. Goldbach (Eds.), Principles of syntactic reconstruction (pp. 73–95). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Harris, A.C., & L. Campbell

(1995) Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Harrison, S.P.

(2003) On the limits of the comparative method. In B.D. Joseph, & R.D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 343–368). Oxford: Blackwell.

Haspelmath, M.

(1999) Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics, 37, 1043–1068.

(2001) Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languages. In A.Y. Aikhenvald, R.M.W. Dixon, & M. Onishi (Eds.), Non-canonical marking of subjects and objects (pp. 53–83). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Haspelmath, M., & Caruana, S.

(2000) Subject diffuseness in Maltese: On some subject properties of experiential verbs. Folia Linguistica, 34(3–4), 245–265.

Heine, B.

(1993) Auxiliaries: Cognitive forces and grammaticalization. New York: Oxford University Press.

(1994) Grammaticalization as an explanatory parameter. In W. Pagliuca (Ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization (pp. 255–287). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

(2002) On the role of context in grammaticalization. In O. Wischer, & G. Diewald (Eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (pp. 83–101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

(2003) On degrammaticalization. In B. Blake, & K. Burridge (Eds.), Historical linguistics 2001: Selected papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics (pp. 163–179). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemayer, F.

(1991) Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Heine, B., & Kuteva, T.

(2002) World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

(2005) Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

(2006) The changing languages of Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.

(2007) The genesis of grammar: A reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Heine, B., & M. Reh

(1984) Grammaticalization and reanalysis in African languages. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.

Hilpert, M.

(2008) Where did this future construction come from? A case study of Swedish komma att V . In A. Bergs, & G. Diewald (Eds.), Constructions and language change (pp. 107–131). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

(2013) Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word formation and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

(2014) Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Hollmann, W.B., & Siewierska, A.

(2007) A construction grammar account of possessive constructions in Lancashire Dialect: Some advantages and challenges. English Language and Linguistics, 11(2), 407–424.

(2011) The status of frequency, schemas, and identity in cognitive sociolinguistics: A case study on definite article reduction. Cognitive Linguistics, 22(1), 25–54.

Hopper, P.

(1987) Emergent grammar. Berkeley Linguistic Society, 13, 139–157.

(1991) On some principles of grammaticization. In E.C. Traugott, & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 1–2 (pp. 17–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Hopper, P.J., & E.C. Traugott

(1993 [2003]) Grammaticalization. 1st/2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Humboldt, W. von

(1825) Über das Entstehen der grammatikalischen Formen und ihren Einfluβ auf die Ideenentwicklung. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 2, 401–430.

Israel, M.

(1996) The way constructions grow. In A.E. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language (pp. 217–230). Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Jackendoff, R.

(1997) Twistin’ the night away. Language, 73, 534–559.

Janda, L.

(2010) Alternative radial categories for the Old Norse genitive. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift, 28(2), 280–289.

Janda, R.D.

(2001) Beyond "pathways" and "unidirectionality". Language Sciences, 22(2–3), 265–340.

Jeffers, R.J.

(1976) Syntactic change and syntactic reconstruction. In W.M. Christie, Jr. (Ed.), Current progress in historical linguistics: Proceedings of the second International Conference on Historical Linguistics (pp. 1–15). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Joseph, B.

(2011) Grammaticalization: A general critique. In H. Narrog, & B. Heine (Eds.), Oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp. 193–205). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kay, P.

(1997) Construction grammar feature structures (revised). Available at http://www.icsi.berkeley.edu/~kay/bcg/FSrev.html.

(2002) Patterns of coining. Available at http://www1.icsi.berkeley.edu/~kay/coining.pdf.

Kuryłowicz, J.

(1976 [1965]) The evolution of grammatical categories. Reprinted in Jerzy Kuryłowicz, 1976, Esquisses linguistiques, Vol. 2 (pp. 38–54). Munich: Fink.

Lakoff, G.

(1977) Linguistic gestalts. Chicago Linguistics Society, 13, 236–287.

(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Langacker, R.W.

(1977) Syntactic reanalysis. In C.N. Li (Ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change (pp. 57–139). Austin: University of Texas Press.

(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

(1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar II: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

(2008) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lightfoot, D.

(1979) Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

(1991) How to set parameters: Arguments from language change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

(2006) How new languages emerge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Meillet, A.

(1912) L'evolution des formes grammaticales. Scientia (Rivista di Scienza), 12(26), 6.

Melis, C., & Flores, M.

(2012) Emergence and grammaticalization of constructions within the se me network of Spanish. In K. Davidse, T. Breban, L. Brems, & T. Mortelmans (Eds.), Grammaticalization and language change: New reflections (pp. 249–270). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Michaelis, L.A.

(2013) Sign-based construction grammar. In T. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 133–152). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Michaelis, L.A., & Ruppenhofer, J.

(2001) Beyond alternations: A constructional model of the German applicative pattern. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Narrog, H., & Heine, B.

(Eds.) (2011) The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Noël, D.

(2007) Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language, 14(2), 177–202.

Norde, M.

(2001) Deflexion as a counterdirectional factor in grammatical change. Language Sciences, 23(2–3), 231–364.

Nunberg, G., I.A. Sag, & T. Wasow

(1994) Idioms. Language, 70, 491–538.

Nygaard, M.

(1906) Norrøn syntax [Old Norse syntax]. Reprinted 1996. Oslo: H. Aschehoug.

Östman, J., & Fried, M.

(2004) Historical and intellectual Background of construction grammar. In M. Fried, & J. Östman (Eds.), Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective (pp. 1–10). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Paul, H.

(1920 [1880]) Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. 5th Edition. Halle: Niemeyer.

Sag, I.

(2012) Sign-based construction grammar: An informal synopsis. In H.C. Boas, & I.A. Sag (Eds.), Sign-based construction grammar (pp. 69–202). Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Smith, K.A.

(2001) The role of frequency in the specialization of the English anterior. In J. Bybee, & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 361–382). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Steels, L.

(Ed.) (2011) Design patterns in fluid construction grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

(Ed.) (2012) Computational issues in fluid construction grammar. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

Timberlake, A.

(1977) Reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change. In C. Li (Ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change (pp. 141–477). Austin: University of Texas Press.

Tomasello, M.

(1998) Cognitive linguistics. In W. Bechtel, & G. Graham (Eds.), A companion to cognitive science (pp. 477–487). Oxford: Blackwell.

Traugott, E.C.

(2003) Constructions in grammaticalization. In B.D. Joseph, & R.D. Janda (Eds.), A handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 624–647). Oxford: Blackwell.

(2008a) Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. In R. Eckardt, G. Jäger, & T. Veenstra (Eds.), Variation, selection, development – Probing the evolutionary model of language change (pp. 219–250). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

(2008b) “All that he endeavoured to prove was …”: On the emergence of grammatical constructions in dialogic contexts. In R. Cooper, & R. Kempson (Eds.), Language in flux: Dialogue coordination, language variation, change and evolution (pp. 143–177). London: Kings College Publications.

Traugott, E.C., & Heine, B.

(Eds.) (1991) Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 1–2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Traugott, E.C., & Trousdale, G.

(2013) Constructionalization and constructional change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Trousdale, G.

(2008) Constructions in grammaticalization and lexicalization: Evidence from the history of a composite predicate in English. In G. Trousdale, & N. Gisborne (Eds.), Constructional approaches to English grammar (pp. 33–67). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

(2013) Multiple inheritance and constructional change. Studies in Language, 37(3), 491–514.

Watkins, C.

(1964) Preliminaries to the reconstruction of Indo-European sentence structure. In H.G. Lunt (Ed.), Proceedings of the IX International Congress of Linguists (pp. 1035–1045). The Hague: Mouton.

Wessén, E.

(1965) Svensk språkhistoria III: Grundlinjer till en historisk syntax [Swedish language history III: The basics of historical syntax]. Reprinted 1992 by Akademitryck. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.