Article published in:
Diachronic Construction Grammar
Edited by Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer and Spike Gildea
[Constructional Approaches to Language 18] 2015
► pp. 81106
References

References

Askedal, J.O.
(1984) Grammatikalisierung und Auxiliarisierung im sogenannten ‚bekommen/kriegen/erhalten-Passiv‘ des Deutschen. Kopenhagener Beiträge zur Germanistischen Linguistik, 22, 5–47.
(2005) Grammatikalisierung und Persistenz im deutschen Rezipienten-Passiv mit bekommen/kriegen/erhalten . In T. Leuschner, T. Mortelmans, & S. De Groodt (Eds.), Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen (pp. 211–228). Berlin: de Gruyter. Crossref link
Bader, M.
(2012) The German bekommen passive: A case study on frequency and grammaticality. Linguistische Berichte, 231, 249–298.
Barðdal, J.
(2008) Productivity: Evidence from case and argument structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Barðdal, J., & Chelliah, S.
(Eds.) (2009) The role of semantic, pragmatic and discourse factors in the development of case. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Crossref link
Bergs, A., & Diewald, G.
(Eds.) (2008) Constructions and language change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
(Eds.) (2009) Context and constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Bybee, J.
(2003) Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In B.D. Joseph, & R.J. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 602–623). Oxford: Blackwell. Crossref link
(2006) From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Languages 82(4), 711–733. Crossref link
(2010) Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Bybee, J., & Cacoullos, R.T.
(2009) The role of prefabs in grammaticization: How the particular and the general interact in language change. In R. Corrigan, E. Moravcsik, H. Ouali, & K. Wheatley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2007 university of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Symposium on Formulaic Language (pp. 187–217). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Cristofaro, S.
(2012) Cognitive explanations, distributional evidence, and diachrony. In N. Gisborne, & W. Hollmann (Eds.), Theory and data in cognitive linguistics. Special issue of Studies in Language, 36(3), 645–670. Crossref link
Croft, W.
(1998) Linguistic evidence and mental representations. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 151–173. Crossref link
(2001) Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
Croft, W., & Cruse, D.A.
(2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
De Smet, H.
(2012) The course of actualization. Language, 88, 601–633. Crossref link
Diewald, G.
(1997) Grammatikalisierung: Eine Einführung in Sein und Werden grammatischer Formen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Crossref link
(2002) A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer, & G. Diewald (Eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (pp. 103–120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2006) Context types in grammaticalization as constructions. In D. Schönefeld (Ed.), Constructions. Special Volume 1: Constructions all over - case studies and theoretical implications. [www​.constructions​-online​.de]
(2008) The catalytic function of constructional restrictions in grammaticalization. In E. Verhoeven, S. Skopeteas, Y.-M. Shin, Y. Nishina, & J. Helmbrecht (Eds.), Studies on grammaticalization (pp. 219–240). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Diewald, G., & Smirnova, E.
(2010) Evidentiality in German. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
(2012) Paradigmatic integration: The fourth stage in an expanded grammaticalization scenario. In K. Davidse, T. Breban, L. Brems, & T. Mortelmans (Eds.), Grammaticalization and language change: New reflections (pp. 111–134). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Fillmore, C., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M.C.
(1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language, 64(3), 501–538. Crossref link
Fried, M.
(2008) Constructions and constructs: Mapping a shift between predication and attribution. In A. Bergs, & G. Diewald (Eds.), Constructions and language change, 47–79.
(2009) Representing contextual factors in language change: Between frames and constructions. In A. Bergs, & G. Diewald (Eds.), Context and constructions, 63–94. Crossref link
Goldberg, A.
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harris, A., & Campbell, L.
(1995) Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Haspelmath, M.
(2004) On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In O. Fischer, M. Norde, & H. Perridon (Eds.), Up and down the cline: The nature of grammaticalization (pp. 17–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Heine, B.
(2002) On the role of context in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer, & G. Diewald (Eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (pp. 83–101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Hilpert, M.
(2013) Corpus-based approaches to constructional change. In G. Trousdale, & Th. Hoffmann (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 458–477). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Himmelmann, N.
(2004) Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In W. Bisang, N.P. Himmelmann, & B. Wiemer (Eds.), What makes grammaticalization - A look from its fringes and its components (pp. 21–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Hopper, P.
(1991) On some principles of grammaticalization. In E.C. Traugott, & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. I (pp. 17–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Hopper, P., & Traugott, E.C.
(2003) Grammaticalization. 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Israel, M.
(1996) The way constructions grow. In A.L. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language (pp. 217–230). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Kuteva, T.
(2004) Auxiliation: An enquiry into the nature of grammaticalization. 2nd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Langacker, R.W.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
(2008) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
Leirbukt, O.
(1997) Untersuchungen zu bekommen-Passiv im heutigen Deutsch. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Crossref link
Noël, D.
(2007) Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language, 14, 177–202. Crossref link
Rostila, J.
(2004) Lexicalization as a way to grammaticalization. In F. Karlsson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 20th Scandinavian conference of linguistics. http://​www​.ling​.helsinki​.fi​/kielitiede​/20scl​/Rostila​.pdf.
Smirnova, E.
(2006) Die Entwicklung der Konstruktion würde + Infinitiv im Deutschen. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Stathi, K.
(2010) Is German gehören an auxiliary? The grammaticalization of the construction gehören + participle II. In K. Stathi, E. Gehweiler, & E. König (Eds.), Grammaticalization: Current views and issues (pp. 323–342). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Timberlake, A.
(1977) Reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change. In C. Li (Ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change (pp. 141–177). Austin, Texas: University of Texas.
Traugott, E.C.
(2008) Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. In R. Eckardt, G. Jäger, & T. Veenstra (Eds.), Variation, selection, development: Probing the evolutionary model of language change (pp. 219–250). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Traugott, E.C., & Richard, B.D.
(2002) Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, E.C., & Trousdale, G.
(2010) Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization: How do they intersect? In E.C. Traugott, & G. Trousdale (Eds), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization (pp. 19–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2013) Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
Trousdale, G.
(2008) Constructions in grammaticalization and lexicalization: Evidence from the history of a composite predicate construction in English. In G. Trousdale, & N. Gisborne (Eds.), Constructional approaches to English grammar (pp. 33–67). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2010) Issues in constructional approaches to grammaticalization. In K. Stathi, E. Gehweiler, & E. Konig (Eds.), Grammaticalization: Current views and issues (pp. 51–71). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2012) Theory and data in diachronic construction grammar: The case of the what with construction. In N. Gisborne, & W. Hollmann (Eds.), Theory and data in cognitive linguistics. Special issue of Studies in Language, 36(3), 576–602.
Wegener, H.
(1985) ‘Er bekommt widersprochen‘: Argumente für die Existenz eines Dativpassivs im Deutschen. Linguistische Berichte, 96, 127–139.
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Flach, Susanne
2020.  In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27],  pp. 46 ff. Crossref logo
Smirnova, Elena
2015. When secondary grammaticalization starts: a look from the constructional perspective. Language Sciences 47  pp. 215 ff. Crossref logo
Smirnova, Elena & Lotte Sommerer
2020.  In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27],  pp. 2 ff. Crossref logo
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2015. The constructionalization of the Chinese cleft construction. Studies in Language 39:2  pp. 459 ff. Crossref logo
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2019. The development of the Chinese copula shì construction. Functions of Language 26:2  pp. 139 ff. Crossref logo
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2020. A study of the development of the Chinese correlative comparative construction from the perspective of constructionalization. Diachronica 37:1  pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 april 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.