Article published in:
Diachronic Construction Grammar
Edited by Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer and Spike Gildea
[Constructional Approaches to Language 18] 2015
► pp. 139–172

Irregular morphology in regular syntactic patterns

A case of constructional re-alignment

| Charles University, Prague
In exploring the multi-dimensional and incremental nature of grammatical change that emerges from the recurrent interaction between a form and its environment, this study demonstrates that a systematic examination of morphological irregularity can enrich our understanding of the anatomy of grammatical change. The empirical focus is the functional crystallization of a particular type of participial adjective (PA) in Old Czech, as manifested in morphologically irregular tokens of this category. The analysis of their behavior vis-à-vis the regular PAs in comparable environments (clausal vs. adnominal constructions) shows that the two formation types are both sensitive to roughly the same set of features in developing a different functional status (secondary predicate vs. adnominal modifier), but each ‘compensates’ for the mismatch between its morphology and each syntactic function in a characteristically different way. At the theoretical level, the analysis leads toward clarifying the content of the notion ‘constructionalization’ as a hypothetically distinct type of change, and offers some thoughts on spelling out the role of constructions in grammatical reorganization.
Published online: 30 July 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.05fri
References
Aarts, B
(2007) Syntactic gradience: The nature of syntactic indeterminacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brinton, L.J., & Traugott, E.C
(2005) Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W
(2001) Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C.J
(1988) The mechanisms of ‘Construction Grammar’. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 14, 35–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1989) Grammatical construction theory and the familiar dichotomies. In R. Dietrich, & C.F. Graumann (Eds.), Language processing in social context (pp. 17–38). Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fried, M
(2007) A frame semantic account of morphosemantic change: the case of Old Czech věřící . In D. Divjak, & A. Kochanska (Eds.), Cognitive paths into the Slavic domain (pp. 283–315). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Constructions and constructs: Mapping a shift between predication and attribution. In A. Bergs, & G. Diewald (Eds.), Constructions and language change (pp. 47–79). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2010) Grammaticalization and lexicalization effects in participial morphology: A Construction Grammar approach to language change. In A. Van linden, J.-Ch. Verstraete, & K. Davidse (Eds.), Formal evidence in grammaticalization research (pp. 191–224). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fried, M., & Östman, J.-O
(2004) Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In M. Fried, & J.-O. Östman (Eds.), Construction Grammar in a cross-language perspective (pp. 11–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, N.P
(2004) Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In W. Bisang, N. Himmelmann, & B. Wiemer (Eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components (pp. 19–40). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P.J., & Traugott, E.C
(1993) Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kurz, J
(1958) K otázce doby vzniku slovanských adjektiv složených a jejich původního významu [On the origin of Slavic ‘long’ adjectives and their initial meaning]. In Studie ze slovanské jazykovědy, sborník k 70. narozeninám akademika Fr. Trávníčka (pp. 211–219). Praha: SPN.Google Scholar
Marvan, J., Michálek, E., & Němec, I
(1963) Základní procesy v lexikálním vývoji českého jazyka [Basic processes in the lexical development of Czech]. In Čs. přednášky pro V. mezinárodní sjezd slavistů v Sofii (pp. 105−113). Praha: Nakladatelství ČSAV.Google Scholar
Michálek, E
(1963) Staročeská adjektiva typu lácí, lajúcí [Old Czech adjectives of the type lácí, lajúcí ]. Listy filologické, 86, 127–130.Google Scholar
Rosenbach, A
(2010) How synchronic gradience makes sense in the light of language change (and vice versa). In E.C. Traugott, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization (pp. 149–179). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Staročeský slovník
[Old Czech Dictionary] (1968) Praha: Academia.Google Scholar
Traugott, E.C
(2008) The grammaticalization of NP of NP patterns. In A. Bergs, & G. Diewald (Eds.), Constructions and language change (pp. 21–34). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Traugott, E.C., & Trousdale, G
(2010) Introduction. In E.C. Traugott, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization (pp. 1–18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, G
(2010) Issues in constructional approaches to grammaticalization in English. In K. Stathi, E. Gehweiler, & E. König (Eds.), Grammaticalization: Current views and issues (pp. 51–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, P.M
(2000) Grammaticalisation and part-of-speech systems. In P.M. Vogel, & B. Comrie (Eds.), Approaches to the typology of word classes (pp. 259–284). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vondrák, V
(1908) O místě atributivního adjektiva a substantivního genitivu ve větě [On the position of attributive adjectives and adnominal genitives in the sentence]. In Zbornik u slavu Vatroslava Jagica (pp. 151–158). Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Hartmann, Stefan
2021. Diachronic Cognitive Linguistics. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 9:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Johnson, Cynthia A., Peter Alexander Kerkhof, Leonid Kulikov, Esther Le Mair & Jóhanna Barðdal
2019. Argument structure, conceptual metaphor and semantic change. Diachronica 36:4 ► pp. 463 ff. Crossref logo
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2020. Reinforcement by realignment in diachronic construction grammar. Constructions and Frames 12:2 ► pp. 206 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 may 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.