A geometric exemplar-based model of semantic structure
The Dutch causative construction with laten
This paper addresses an under-investigated issue of the structure of constructional
meaning, presenting an innovative corpus-based bottom-up approach,
which represents the semantic similarities between exemplars of a construction
with the help of Multidimensional Scaling. The study explores the main semantic
dimensions and senses of the Dutch causative construction with the auxiliary
laten ‘let’. The quantitative analyses of 731 corpus examples, which were
coded for 35 various contextual variables, show that the constructional semantics
is organized as a doughnut, with an empty centre and extensive periphery.
The main senses, which are represented by clusters of similar exemplars, are not
discrete, but represent a continuum. These findings are contrasted with previous
accounts, which assumed a discrete prototype-based structure of the meaning.
References
Borg, I., & Groenen, P
(
1997)
Modern multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications. New York: Springer.
Brugman, C.M
(
1983)
The story of over. Bloomington: Indiana University.
Bybee, J.L
(
2010)
Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, J.L., & Eddington, D
(
2006)
A usage-based approach to Spanish verbs of ‘becoming’.
Language, 82(2), 323–355.
Davidse, K., & Heyvaert, L
(
2003)
On the so-called ‘middle’ construction in English and Dutch. In
S. Granger,
J. Lerot, &
S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.),
Corpus-based approaches to contrastive linguistics and translation studies (pp. 57–73). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Geeraerts, D
(
2010)
Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, A.E
(
1995)
Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A.E
(
2006)
Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gower, J.C
(
1971)
A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties,
Biometrics, 27, 857–874.
Gries, S. Th
(
2006)
Corpus-based methods and cognitive semantics: The many senses of to run
. In
S. Th. Gries &
A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.),
Corpora in cognitive linguistics. corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis (pp. 57–99). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
van der Horst, J.M
(
1998)
Doen in Old and Early Middle Dutch: A comparative approach. In
I. Tieken-Boon van Ostade,
M. van der Wal, &
A. van Leuvensteijn (Eds.), ‘
Do’ in English, Dutch and German. History and present-day variation (pp. 53–64). Munster: Nodus Publicationen.
Kemmer, S., & Verhagen, A
(
1994)
The grammar of causatives and the conceptual structure of events.
Cognitive Linguistics, 5, 115–156.
Lakoff, G
(
1987)
Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
de Leeuw, J., & Mair, P
(
2009)
Multidimensional scaling using majorization: SMACOF in R.
Journal of Statistical Software 31(3): 1–30.
[URL]. (Last access 17.11.2011)
Levshina, N
(
2011)
Doe wat je niet laten kan: A usage-based analysis of the Dutch causative constructions. Ph.D. dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Medin, D.L., & Schaffer, M.M
(
1978)
Context theory of classification learning.
Psychological Review, 85, 207–238.
Murphy, G.L
(
2002)
The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Oostdijk, N.H.J
(
2002)
The design of the Spoken Dutch Corpus. In
P. Peters,
P. Collins, &
A. Smith (Eds.),
New frontiers of corpus research (pp. 105–112). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Ordelman, R., de Jong, F., van Hessen, A., & Hondorp, H
(
2007)
TwNC: A multifaceted Dutch News Corpus.
ELRA Newsletter 12 (3–4),
[URL] (last access 17.11.2011)
R Development Core Team
(
2011)
R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
[URL] (last access 17.11.2011)
Rosch, E
(
1975)
Cognitive representation of semantic categories.
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104(3), 192–233.
Rosch, E
(
1978)
Principles of categorization. In
E. Rosch &
B.B. Lloyd (Eds.),
Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C.B
(
1975)
Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories.
Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.
Talmy, L
(
2000)
Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tyler, A., & Evans, V
(
2001)
Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: The Case of Over
.
Language, 77(4), 724–765.
Stukker, N
(
2005)
Causality marking across levels of language structure. University of Utrecht dissertation.
Venables, W.N., & Ripley, B.D
(
2002)
Modern applied statistics with S. New York: Springer.
Verhagen, A., & Kemmer, S
(
1997)
Interaction and causation: Causative constructions in modern standard Dutch.
Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 61–82.
Zeschel, A
(
2010)
Exemplars and analogy: Semantic extension in constructional networks. In
D. Glynn &
K. Fischer (Eds.),
Quantitative methods in cognitive semantics: Corpus-driven approaches (pp. 201–219). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Wiliński, Jarosław
2017.
On the Brink of-Noun vs. On the Verge of-Noun: a Distinctive-Collexeme Analysis.
Research in Language 15:4
► pp. 425 ff.
徐, 文倩
2022.
Review and Prospect of Semantic Research Methods of Synonyms at Home and Abroad.
Modern Linguistics 10:03
► pp. 366 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.